• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口罩对言语理解的影响:言语测听中的临床视角

Effect of face masks on speech understanding: A clinical perspective during speech audiometry.

作者信息

Kumar Rawish, Munjal Sanjay Kumar, Sharma Anuradha, Alam Md Noorain, Panda Naresh K

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

J Otol. 2022 Jul;17(3):140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.joto.2022.04.004
PMID:35847571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9270560/
Abstract

The objective was to measure the effect of various face masks on speech recognition threshold and the word recognition score in the presence of varying background noise levels. 20 normal-hearing adult subjects (a total of 40 ears) participated. Pure tone audiometry followed by speech recognition threshold and word recognition score at the most comfortable level in varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNR0, SNR10, and SNR15) using surgical, pleated cloth, and N95 masks. Using surgical, cloth, and N95 masks, speech recognition thresholds increased by 1.8 dB, 4.4 dB, and 5.05 dB, respectively. Word recognition scores decreased by 32% without a mask, 43.7% in a surgical mask, 46.3% in a cloth mask, and 46.7% in N95 mask conditions, between SNR15 and SNR0. The speech recognition threshold was negatively affected with cloth and N95 masks. Surgical masks do not affect the word recognition scores at lower background noise levels. However, as the signal-to-noise ratio decreased, even the surgical, cloth, and N95 masks significantly impacted the word recognition score even in normal-hearing individuals.

摘要

目的是测量在不同背景噪声水平下,各种口罩对言语识别阈值和单词识别分数的影响。20名听力正常的成年受试者(共40只耳朵)参与了研究。先进行纯音听力测定,然后使用外科口罩、褶皱布口罩和N95口罩,在不同信噪比(SNR0、SNR10和SNR15)下,于最舒适水平测量言语识别阈值和单词识别分数。使用外科口罩、布口罩和N95口罩时,言语识别阈值分别提高了1.8 dB、4.4 dB和5.05 dB。在SNR15和SNR0之间,不戴口罩时单词识别分数下降了32%,戴外科口罩时下降了43.7%,戴布口罩时下降了46.3%,戴N95口罩时下降了46.7%。布口罩和N95口罩对言语识别阈值有负面影响。在较低背景噪声水平下,外科口罩不会影响单词识别分数。然而,随着信噪比降低,即使是外科口罩、布口罩和N95口罩,对听力正常个体的单词识别分数也有显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/9270560/4dfcf2cc1b70/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/9270560/ecd0ab6d23e2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/9270560/1799e72dfcc5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/9270560/4dfcf2cc1b70/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/9270560/ecd0ab6d23e2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/9270560/1799e72dfcc5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7a/9270560/4dfcf2cc1b70/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of face masks on speech understanding: A clinical perspective during speech audiometry.口罩对言语理解的影响:言语测听中的临床视角
J Otol. 2022 Jul;17(3):140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
Influence of surgical and N95 face masks on speech perception and listening effort in noise.手术口罩和 N95 口罩对噪声环境下言语感知和听力努力的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253874. eCollection 2021.
3
Effect of wearing personal protective equipment on acoustic characteristics and speech perception during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间佩戴个人防护装备对声学特性及言语感知的影响。
Appl Acoust. 2022 Aug;197:108940. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108940. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
4
Impact of Masks on Speech Recognition in Adult Patients with and without Hearing Loss.口罩对有无听力损失的成年患者言语识别的影响。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2022;84(4):302-308. doi: 10.1159/000518944. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
5
The effects of face masks on speech-in-speech recognition for children and adults.口罩对儿童和成人语音中语音识别的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2023 Nov;62(11):1014-1021. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2168218. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
6
Speech understanding using surgical masks: a problem in health care?使用外科口罩时的言语理解:医疗保健中的一个问题?
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Oct;19(9):686-95. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.9.4.
7
Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols.口罩对面部分析和言语感知的影响:对大流行前协议的启示。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Dec;148(6):3562. doi: 10.1121/10.0002873.
8
Effects of face masks on speech recognition in multi-talker babble noise.面罩对多说话者嘈杂噪声环境中语音识别的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0246842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246842. eCollection 2021.
9
Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: dependence on frequency and threshold parameters.应用时频掩蔽后噪声中的语音识别:频率和阈值参数的依赖性。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Apr;133(4):2390-6. doi: 10.1121/1.4792143.
10
Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.3430名退伍军人的噪声中言语测试临床经验:与纯音阈值及安静环境下言语识别的比较
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):405-23. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.7.3.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual and Acoustic Aspects of Face Masks Affect Speech Intelligibility in Listeners with Different Hearing Statuses.口罩的视觉和声学特性对不同听力状况的听众的言语可懂度有影响。
Audiol Res. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):7. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15010007.
2
How the COVID-19 Pandemic Muted and Remixed the World's Acoustics for a While.新冠疫情如何在一段时间内使全球声音环境变得安静并重塑其格局。
Curr Pollut Rep. 2022;8(4):328-340. doi: 10.1007/s40726-022-00236-5. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Acoustic Effect of Face Mask Design and Material Choice.口罩设计与材料选择的声学效应
Acoust Aust. 2021;49(3):505-512. doi: 10.1007/s40857-021-00245-2. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
2
Acoustic effects of medical, cloth, and transparent face masks on speech signals.医用、布制和透明口罩对面部语音信号的声学影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Oct;148(4):2371. doi: 10.1121/10.0002279.
3
"I'm smiling back at you": Exploring the impact of mask wearing on communication in healthcare.“我对你回以微笑”:探索口罩佩戴对医疗保健沟通的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Jan;56(1):205-214. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12578. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
4
Performance of fabrics for home-made masks against the spread of COVID-19 through droplets: A quantitative mechanistic study.自制口罩织物对新冠病毒通过飞沫传播的防护性能:一项定量机理研究。
Extreme Mech Lett. 2020 Oct;40:100924. doi: 10.1016/j.eml.2020.100924. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
5
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks.常见医用口罩滤布材料的气溶胶过滤效率。
ACS Nano. 2020 May 26;14(5):6339-6347. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c03252. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
6
Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions: Potential Implications for Reducing Transmission of COVID-19.湍流气体云与呼吸道病原体排放:对减少新冠病毒传播的潜在影响
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1837-1838. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4756.
7
Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness.人在讲话时,飞沫和气溶胶的排放与超量排放会随音量增大而增加。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 20;9(1):2348. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38808-z.
8
Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior.聆听努力:听觉挑战的认知后果如何在大脑和行为中反映出来。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):204-214. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000494.
9
Speech intelligibility assessment of protective facemasks and air-purifying respirators.防护口罩和空气净化呼吸器的言语清晰度评估
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016 Dec;13(12):960-968. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1200723.
10
How Social Psychological Factors May Modulate Auditory and Cognitive Functioning During Listening.社会心理因素如何在倾听过程中调节听觉和认知功能。
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:92S-100S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000323.