From the Division of Emergency Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Midtown Hospital, Emory University, 550 Peachtree Rd, Atlanta, GA 30308 (T.N.H., E.A.K, J.O.J.) and Virtual Radiologic, Eden Prairie, Minn. (C.L., S.W.).
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):205-212. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170555. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
Purpose To determine whether there is an association between radiologist shift length, schedule, or examination volume and interpretive accuracy. Materials and Methods This study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. A retrospective analysis of all major discrepancies from a 2015 quality assurance database of a teleradiology practice was performed. Board-certified radiologists provided initial preliminary interpretations. Discrepancies were identified during a secondary review by a practicing radiologist or through an internal quality assurance process and were vetted through a consensus radiology quality assurance committee. Unique anonymous radiologist identifiers were used to link the discrepancies to radiologists' shifts and schedules. Data were analyzed by using analysis of variance, t test, or χ test. Results A total of 4294 major discrepancies resulted from 2 922 377 examinations (0.15%). There was a significant difference for shift length (P < .0001) and volume (P < .0001) for shifts with versus those without discrepancies. On average, errors occurred a mean (± standard deviation) of 8.97 hours ± 2.28 into the shift (median, 10 hours; interquartile range, 2.0 hours). Significantly more errors occurred late in shifts than early (P < .0001), peaking between 10 and 12 hours. The number of major discrepancies in a single shift ranged from one to four, with a significant difference in the number of discrepancies as a function of study volume (volume for all shifts, 67.60 ± 60.24; volume for shifts with major discrepancies, 118.96 ± 66.89; P < .001). Despite a trend for more discrepancies after more consecutive days worked, the difference was not significant (P = .0893). Conclusion Longer shifts and higher diagnostic examination volumes are associated with increased major interpretive discrepancies. These are more likely to occur later in a shift, peaking after the 10th hour of work. RSNA, 2017.
确定放射科医师轮班时长、排班或检查量与诊断准确性之间是否存在关联。
本研究经机构审查委员会批准并符合 HIPAA 规定。对 2015 年远程放射实践质量保证数据库中的所有重大差异进行回顾性分析。经认证的放射科医师提供初始初步解释。差异通过执业放射科医师的二次审查或内部质量保证过程确定,并通过放射科质量保证委员会的共识进行审查。使用唯一的匿名放射科医师标识符将差异与放射科医师的轮班和排班联系起来。通过方差分析、t 检验或 χ 检验对数据进行分析。
共 4294 例重大差异来自 2922377 例检查(0.15%)。有差异的轮班与无差异的轮班在轮班时长(P<0.0001)和检查量(P<0.0001)方面存在显著差异。平均而言,错误发生在轮班时长的 8.97 小时±2.28(中位数 10 小时;四分位距 2.0 小时)。轮班后期明显比轮班早期更容易出现错误(P<0.0001),高峰期在 10 至 12 小时。单个轮班的重大差异数量从 1 个到 4 个不等,差异数量与研究量呈函数关系(所有轮班的差异数量为 67.60±60.24;有重大差异的轮班的差异数量为 118.96±66.89;P<0.001)。尽管连续工作天数增加,差异的趋势更明显,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.0893)。
更长的轮班时长和更高的诊断检查量与更多的重大诊断差异相关。这些差异更有可能在轮班后期发生,在工作 10 小时后达到峰值。