Faugeras Frédéric, Rohaut Benjamin, Valente Mélanie, Sitt Jacobo, Demeret Sophie, Bolgert Francis, Weiss Nicolas, Grinea Alexandra, Marois Clémence, Quirins Marion, Demertzi Athena, Raimondo Federico, Galanaud Damien, Habert Marie-Odile, Engemann Denis, Puybasset Louis, Naccache Lionel
a AP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière , Department of Neurology , Paris , France.
b AP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière , Department of Neurophysiology , Paris , France.
Brain Inj. 2018;32(1):72-77. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1364421. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
The prognosis value of early clinical diagnosis of consciousness impairment is documented by an extremely limited number of studies, whereas it may convey important information to guide medical decisions.
We aimed at determining if patients diagnosed at an early stage (<90 days after brain injury) as being in the minimally conscious state (MCS) have a better prognosis than patients in the vegetative state/Unresponsive Wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS), independent of care limitations or withdrawal decisions.
Patients hospitalized in ICUs of the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris, France) from November 2008 to January 2011 were included and evaluated behaviourally with standardized assessment and with the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised as being either in the VS/UWS or in the MCS. They were then prospectively followed until 1July 2011 to evaluate their outcome with the GOSE. We compared survival function and outcomes of these two groups.
Both survival function and outcomes, including consciousness recovery, were significantly better in the MCS group. This difference of outcome still holds when considering only patients still alive at the end of the study.
Early accurate clinical diagnosis of VS/UWS or MCS conveys a strong prognostic value of survival and of consciousness recovery.
意识障碍早期临床诊断的预后价值仅有极少量研究进行了记录,然而它可能传达重要信息以指导医疗决策。
我们旨在确定在脑损伤后早期(<90天)被诊断为处于最小意识状态(MCS)的患者是否比处于植物状态/无反应觉醒综合征(VS/UWS)的患者预后更好,且不受护理限制或撤药决定的影响。
纳入2008年11月至2011年1月在法国巴黎皮提耶 - 萨尔佩特里埃医院重症监护病房住院的患者,通过标准化评估和使用修订版昏迷恢复量表对其行为进行评估,确定其处于VS/UWS还是MCS。然后对他们进行前瞻性随访直至2011年7月1日,使用总体结局量表(GOSE)评估其结局。我们比较了这两组的生存函数和结局。
MCS组的生存函数和结局,包括意识恢复,均明显更好。当仅考虑研究结束时仍存活的患者时,这种结局差异仍然存在。
VS/UWS或MCS的早期准确临床诊断对生存和意识恢复具有很强的预后价值。