• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在社区参与式研究背景下考察邻里社会凝聚力:学术-社区伙伴关系的描述性研究结果。

Examining Neighborhood Social Cohesion in the Context of Community-based Participatory Research: Descriptive Findings from an Academic-Community Partnership.

机构信息

Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Kingston Coalition, Birmingham, Alabama.

出版信息

Ethn Dis. 2017 Nov 9;27(Suppl 1):329-336. doi: 10.18865/ed.27.S1.329. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.18865/ed.27.S1.329
PMID:29158658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5684777/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to describe the process of conducting an assessment of neighborhood perceptions and cohesion by a community coalition-academic team created in the context of community-based participatory research (CBPR), to guide the design of locally relevant health initiatives.

METHODS

Guided by CBPR principles, a collaborative partnership was established between an academic center and a local, urban, underserved neighborhood in Birmingham, Alabama to identify and address community concerns and priorities. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in September 2016 among community residents (N=90) to examine perceptions of neighborhood characteristics, including social cohesion and neighborhood problems.

RESULTS

The major concerns voiced by the coalition were violence and lack of neighborhood cohesion and safety. The community survey verified the concerns of the coalition, with the majority of participants mentioning increasing safety and stopping the violence as the things to change about the community and the greatest hope for the community. Furthermore, results indicated residents had a moderate level of perceived social cohesion (mean = 2.87 [.67]).

CONCLUSIONS

The Mid-South TCC Academic and Community Engagement (ACE) Core successfully partnered with community members and stakeholders to establish a coalition whose concerns and vision for the community matched the concerns of residents of the community. Collecting data from different groups strengthened the interpretation of the findings and allowed for a rich understanding of neighborhood concerns.

摘要

目的

本文旨在描述在社区参与式研究(CBPR)背景下,由社区联盟-学术团队进行邻里感知和凝聚力评估的过程,以指导制定与当地相关的健康倡议。

方法

在 CBPR 原则的指导下,学术中心与阿拉巴马州伯明翰市一个当地的、城市的、服务不足的邻里之间建立了合作伙伴关系,以确定和解决社区关注的问题和优先事项。2016 年 9 月,对社区居民(N=90)进行了横断面调查,以检查对邻里特征的看法,包括社会凝聚力和邻里问题。

结果

联盟提出的主要问题是暴力以及邻里缺乏凝聚力和安全感。社区调查证实了联盟的担忧,大多数参与者提到增加安全性和制止暴力是社区需要改变的事情,也是社区最大的希望。此外,结果表明居民的感知社会凝聚力处于中等水平(均值=2.87[.67])。

结论

中南部 TCC 学术和社区参与(ACE)核心成功地与社区成员和利益相关者合作,建立了一个联盟,其关注和对社区的愿景与社区居民的关注相匹配。从不同群体收集数据加强了对研究结果的解释,并使人们能够深入了解邻里关注的问题。

相似文献

1
Examining Neighborhood Social Cohesion in the Context of Community-based Participatory Research: Descriptive Findings from an Academic-Community Partnership.在社区参与式研究背景下考察邻里社会凝聚力:学术-社区伙伴关系的描述性研究结果。
Ethn Dis. 2017 Nov 9;27(Suppl 1):329-336. doi: 10.18865/ed.27.S1.329. eCollection 2017.
2
The Value of Social Network Analysis for Evaluating Academic-Community Partnerships and Collaborations for Social Determinants of Health Research.社会网络分析在评估学术-社区伙伴关系和合作以促进健康的社会决定因素研究中的价值。
Ethn Dis. 2017 Nov 9;27(Suppl 1):337-346. doi: 10.18865/ed.27.S1.337. eCollection 2017.
3
Introduction: Impacting the Social Determinants of Health through a Regional Academic-Community Partnership: The Experience of the Mid-South Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Disparities Research.引言:通过地区学术-社区伙伴关系影响健康的社会决定因素:中南部跨学科合作中心健康差异研究的经验。
Ethn Dis. 2017 Nov 9;27(Suppl 1):277-286. doi: 10.18865/ed.27.S1.277. eCollection 2017.
4
Community-based participatory action: impact on a neighborhood levelcommunity health improvement process.基于社区的参与式行动:对社区层面社区健康改善过程的影响
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Spring;2(1):5, 7-15. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2008.0000.
5
Improving Rigor in a Door-to-Door Health Survey: A Participatory Approach in a Low-Income Latino Neighborhood.提高挨家挨户健康调查的严谨性:低收入拉丁裔社区的参与式方法。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016 Spring;10(1):103-11. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0015.
6
A Participatory Group Process within a Health Collaborative to Collect and Disseminate Needs Assessment Data.参与式小组流程在健康协作中收集和传播需求评估数据。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(3):285-297. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0034.
7
Establishing the psychometric properties of constructs in a community-based participatory research conceptual model.在基于社区的参与性研究概念模型中建立构念的心理测量属性。
Am J Health Promot. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):e188-202. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130731-QUAN-398. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
8
Processes and Outcomes of a Community-Based Participatory Research-Driven Health Needs Assessment: A Tool for Moving Health Disparity Reporting to Evidence-Based Action.基于社区参与式研究驱动的健康需求评估的过程与结果:将健康差距报告转化为循证行动的工具
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1S):139-147. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0029.
9
Leveraging community-academic partnerships to improve healthy food access in an urban, Kansas City, Kansas, community.利用社区与学术机构的伙伴关系,改善堪萨斯州堪萨斯城一个城市社区的健康食品供应情况。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):279-88. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0046.
10
"You've got to understand community": community perceptions on "breaking the disconnect" between researchers and communities.“你必须理解社区”:社区对研究人员与社区之间“打破脱节”的看法。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2007 Fall;1(3):231-40. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0021.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived stress and allostatic load: Results from the All of Us Research Program.感知压力与应激负荷:来自“我们所有人”研究项目的结果。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0330106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330106. eCollection 2025.
2
Disparities in multidimensional psychosocial stressors by sexual minority identity among cancer survivors from the All of Us (AoU) Research Program.“我们所有人”(AoU)研究项目中癌症幸存者按性少数群体身份划分的多维心理社会压力源差异。
Res Sq. 2025 Jun 18:rs.3.rs-6884066. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6884066/v1.
3
User guide for Social Determinants of Health Survey data in the All of Us Research Program.“我们所有人”研究计划中健康社会决定因素调查数据用户指南。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Dec 1;31(12):3032-3041. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae214.
4
The KIND Challenge community intervention to reduce loneliness and social isolation, improve mental health, and neighbourhood relationships: an international randomized controlled trial.KIND挑战社区干预措施以减少孤独感和社会隔离、改善心理健康及邻里关系:一项国际随机对照试验。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;60(4):931-942. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02740-z. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
5
The interplay among individuals' distress, daily activities, and perceptions of COVID-19 and neighborhood cohesion: A study using network analysis.个体痛苦、日常活动以及对 COVID-19 和邻里凝聚力的看法之间的相互作用:一项使用网络分析的研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 18;19(1):e0293157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293157. eCollection 2024.
6
Neighborhood social cohesion and serious psychological distress among Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and White adults in the United States: a cross-sectional study.美国亚裔、非裔、西班牙裔/拉丁裔和白人群体中邻里社会凝聚力与严重心理困扰的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;22(1):1191. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13572-4.
7
The Interplay of Environmental Exposures and Mental Health: Setting an Agenda.环境暴露与心理健康的相互作用:制定议程。
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Feb;130(2):25001. doi: 10.1289/EHP9889. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
8
A randomised controlled trial of the Nextdoor Kind Challenge: a study protocol.一项名为“隔壁友善挑战”的随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 5;21(1):1510. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11489-y.
9
Examine the associations between perceived neighborhood conditions, physical activity, and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.探讨在 COVID-19 大流行期间,感知到的邻里环境条件、身体活动与心理健康之间的关联。
Health Place. 2021 Jan;67:102505. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102505. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
10
Geospatial Analysis of Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) for the United States by County.美国各县邻里贫困指数(NDI)的地理空间分析。
J Maps. 2020;16(1):101-112. doi: 10.1080/17445647.2020.1750066. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural Oregon community perspectives: introducing community-based participatory research into a community health coalition.俄勒冈州农村社区的观点:将基于社区的参与性研究引入社区健康联盟。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013 Fall;7(3):313-22. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0032.
2
Social cohesion and self-rated health: The moderating effect of neighborhood physical disorder.社会凝聚力与自评健康:邻里物质无序的调节作用。
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Dec;52(3-4):302-12. doi: 10.1007/s10464-013-9595-1.
3
Community-based participatory research within the Latino health for all coalition.拉丁裔全民健康联盟内基于社区的参与性研究。
J Prev Interv Community. 2013;41(3):142-54. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2013.788341.
4
Neighborhood contexts and the mediating role of neighborhood social cohesion on health and psychological distress among Hispanic and non-Hispanic residents.邻里环境及其对西班牙裔和非西班牙裔居民健康和心理困扰的中介作用:邻里社会凝聚力的作用。
Ann Behav Med. 2012 Feb;43(1):50-61. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9306-9.
5
Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities.社区为基础的参与式研究:一种旨在消除健康差异的政策倡导能力建设方法。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2094-102. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.170506. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
6
Associations between perceived social environment and neighborhood safety: Health implications.感知社会环境与邻里安全的关联:对健康的影响。
Health Place. 2010 Sep;16(5):1007-13. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Jun 20.
7
Neighborhoods and health.社区与健康。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:125-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05333.x.
8
Do perceived neighbourhood cohesion and safety contribute to neighbourhood differences in health?邻里凝聚力和安全感是否会导致邻里间的健康差异?
Health Place. 2009 Dec;15(4):925-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
9
Community violence: a meta-analysis on the effect of exposure and mental health outcomes of children and adolescents.社区暴力:关于儿童和青少年接触社区暴力及其心理健康结果影响的荟萃分析
Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Winter;21(1):227-59. doi: 10.1017/S0954579409000145.
10
Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of neighborhood cohesion and stressors with depressive symptoms in the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis.动脉粥样硬化多民族研究中邻里凝聚力和压力源与抑郁症状的横断面及纵向关联。
Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.002.