• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与式小组流程在健康协作中收集和传播需求评估数据。

A Participatory Group Process within a Health Collaborative to Collect and Disseminate Needs Assessment Data.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(3):285-297. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0034.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2020.0034
PMID:33416604
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inclusion of community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles within an epidemiological study design is anticipated to promote the effective integration of knowledge derived from research data collection into the strategic planning and collaborative effort of a group focused on improving community-based health outcomes. This article describes how CBPR principles were used throughout survey design, data collection, analyses and results dissemination.

METHODS

A health needs assessment survey was developed as a partnership between an academic research group from the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU), a neighborhood-level health and wellness collaborative, and community residents. Survey development, pilot testing, data collection, results dissemination, and action among the health collaborative members were carried out using CBPR principles. Feedback from participants at each stage was collected to improve the overall process of data use within the collaborative.

RESULTS

Data from 1,064 adult participants living in the East End of Richmond, Virginia, were collected. The use of CBPR and epidemiological approaches was successful in promoting effective collaborative efforts, as indicated by 1) sustained organization-level partner participation in the development of survey items and donation of participant incentives; 2) positive feedback from resident- and organization-level participants in a preliminary data dissemination event; 3) strong resident participation at community-wide dissemination events; 4) increases in survey-related blog traffic occurring in conjunction with community-wide dissemination events; and 5) the use of process protocols and results within similar collaboratives across the city.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of CBPR principles with epidemiological methods is a powerful tool for facilitating effective community-level strategic planning within health collaboratives.

摘要

背景

在流行病学研究设计中纳入基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)原则,预计将促进将从研究数据收集获得的知识有效融入到专注于改善基于社区的健康结果的团体的战略规划和协作努力中。本文描述了如何在整个调查设计、数据收集、分析和结果传播过程中使用 CBPR 原则。

方法

一项健康需求评估调查是由弗吉尼亚联邦大学(VCU)的一个学术研究小组、一个邻里级别的健康和健康合作组织以及社区居民之间的伙伴关系共同开发的。调查的制定、试点测试、数据收集、结果传播以及健康合作成员之间的行动都是按照 CBPR 原则进行的。在每个阶段都从参与者那里收集反馈意见,以改进合作组织内数据使用的整体过程。

结果

从弗吉尼亚州里士满东区的 1064 名成年参与者那里收集了数据。CBPR 和流行病学方法的使用成功地促进了有效的合作努力,这表现在以下几个方面:1)持续的组织层面合作伙伴参与调查项目的制定和参与者激励的捐赠;2)在初步数据传播活动中,居民和组织层面参与者的积极反馈;3)在社区范围内的传播活动中,居民的积极参与;4)与社区范围内的传播活动同时发生的与调查相关的博客流量增加;5)在全市范围内的类似合作组织中使用过程协议和结果。

结论

将 CBPR 原则与流行病学方法一起使用,是促进健康合作组织内有效进行社区层面战略规划的有力工具。

相似文献

1
A Participatory Group Process within a Health Collaborative to Collect and Disseminate Needs Assessment Data.参与式小组流程在健康协作中收集和传播需求评估数据。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(3):285-297. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0034.
2
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects.基于社区参与式研究的现实主义评价:伙伴关系协同效应、信任建立及相关连锁反应。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1.
3
Harnessing the power of the grassroots to conduct public health research in sub-Saharan Africa: a case study from western Kenya in the adaptation of community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches.利用基层力量在撒哈拉以南非洲开展公共卫生研究:来自肯尼亚西部的案例研究,介绍了基于社区的参与式研究 (CBPR) 方法的适应性。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 31;13:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-91.
4
Community-Based Participatory Research-Speed Dating: An Innovative Model for Fostering Collaborations Between Community Leaders and Academic Researchers.基于社区的参与式研究——速配:促进社区领袖与学术研究人员合作的创新模式。
Health Promot Pract. 2016 Nov;17(6):775-780. doi: 10.1177/1524839916673612.
5
Community-university partnerships in community-based research.基于社区的研究中的社区-大学伙伴关系。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Winter;6(4):463-9. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0053.
6
Engaging the Dan River Region to reduce obesity: application of the Comprehensive Participatory Planning and Evaluation process.吸引丹河流域居民参与,共同降低肥胖率:综合参与式规划和评估流程的应用。
Fam Community Health. 2012 Jan-Mar;35(1):44-56. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3182385cd9.
7
Walk together children with no wasted steps: community-academic partnering for equal power in NIH proposal development.孩子们携手同行,不浪费一步:社区与学术机构合作,在国立卫生研究院提案制定中实现平等权力。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Winter;4(4):263-77. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2010.0013.
8
Practical Tips for Establishing Partnerships With Academic Researchers: A Resource Guide for Community-Based Organizations.与学术研究人员建立合作关系的实用技巧:社区组织资源指南。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):203-12. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0042.
9
Examining Neighborhood Social Cohesion in the Context of Community-based Participatory Research: Descriptive Findings from an Academic-Community Partnership.在社区参与式研究背景下考察邻里社会凝聚力:学术-社区伙伴关系的描述性研究结果。
Ethn Dis. 2017 Nov 9;27(Suppl 1):329-336. doi: 10.18865/ed.27.S1.329. eCollection 2017.
10
Community Partner Perspectives on Benefits, Challenges, Facilitating Factors, and Lessons Learned from Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships in Detroit.社区合作伙伴对底特律基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的益处、挑战、促进因素及经验教训的看法
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):299-311. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0031.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between caregiver depression and child after-school program participation.照顾者抑郁与儿童课后项目参与之间的关联。
J Fam Soc Work. 2021;24(3):245-260. doi: 10.1080/10522158.2020.1824954. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Understanding the preference for receiving mental health and substance use support in African Americans 50 and older.了解 50 岁及以上非裔美国人对心理健康和物质使用支持的偏好。
J Prev Interv Community. 2023 Jul-Sep;51(3):268-286. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2021.1930820. Epub 2021 May 31.