• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Gardening and age-related weight gain: Results from a cross-sectional survey of Denver residents.园艺与年龄相关的体重增加:丹佛居民横断面调查结果
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Nov 2;8:221-225. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.10.018. eCollection 2017 Dec.
2
[Relationship between fruit and vegetable gardening and health-related factors: male community gardeners aged 50-74 years living in a suburban area of Japan].果蔬园艺与健康相关因素之间的关系:居住在日本郊区的50 - 74岁男性社区园艺者
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2017;64(11):684-694. doi: 10.11236/jph.64.11_684.
3
Allotment gardening and health: a comparative survey among allotment gardeners and their neighbors without an allotment.分配式园艺与健康:分配式园艺种植者及其无分配式园艺邻居的对比调查。
Environ Health. 2010 Nov 23;9:74. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-74.
4
Improving lifestyles sustainability through community gardening: results and lessons learnt from the JArDinS quasi-experimental study.通过社区园艺提高生活方式的可持续性:来自JArDinS准实验研究的结果与经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):1798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09836-6.
5
Harvesting more than vegetables: the potential weight control benefits of community gardening.收获不止于蔬菜:社区园艺的潜在体重控制益处。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):1110-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301009. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
6
Exploring ecological, emotional and social levers of self-rated health for urban gardeners and non-gardeners: A path analysis.探索城市园丁和非园丁自评健康的生态、情感和社会影响因素:路径分析
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;144:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
7
Perceived Benefits of Participation and Risks of Soil Contamination in St. Louis Urban Community Gardens.圣路易斯城市社区花园参与的感知益处和土壤污染风险。
J Community Health. 2018 Jun;43(3):604-610. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0459-8.
8
Effects of a community gardening intervention on diet, physical activity, and anthropometry outcomes in the USA (CAPS): an observer-blind, randomised controlled trial.美国社区园艺干预对饮食、身体活动和人体测量学结果的影响(CAPS):一项观察者盲、随机对照试验。
Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Jan;7(1):e23-e32. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00303-5.
9
Home gardening and associations with fruit and vegetable intake and BMI.家庭园艺与水果和蔬菜摄入量及 BMI 的关系。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Dec;23(18):3417-3422. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020001329. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
10
Health Benefits of Urban Allotment Gardening: Improved Physical and Psychological Well-Being and Social Integration.城市分配式园艺的健康益处:改善身心健康与社会融合
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jan 12;14(1):71. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010071.

引用本文的文献

1
Thinking Health-related Behaviors in a Climate Change Context: A Narrative Review.在气候变化背景下思考与健康相关的行为:叙事评论。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Apr 5;57(3):193-204. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaac039.
2
Experiences of gardening during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.园艺体验在 COVID-19 大流行初期。
Health Place. 2022 Jul;76:102854. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102854. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Participation in gardening activity and its association with improved mental health among family caregivers of people with dementia in rural Uganda.乌干达农村地区痴呆症患者家庭照料者参与园艺活动及其与心理健康改善的关联。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 May 30;23:101412. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101412. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
Improving lifestyles sustainability through community gardening: results and lessons learnt from the JArDinS quasi-experimental study.通过社区园艺提高生活方式的可持续性:来自JArDinS准实验研究的结果与经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):1798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09836-6.
5
Assessing health impacts of home food gardens with Wind River Indian Reservation families: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估温德河印第安人保留区家庭的家庭菜园对健康的影响:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e022731. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022731.
6
Haploinsufficiency of ARHGAP42 is associated with hypertension.ARHGAP42 杂合性缺失与高血压有关。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Aug;27(8):1296-1303. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0382-9. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived community environmental influences on eating behaviors: A Photovoice analysis.感知到的社区环境对饮食行为的影响:一项摄影声音分析法研究
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Dec;171:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
2
Multi-Level, Multi-Component Approaches to Community Based Interventions for Healthy Living-A Three Case Comparison.基于社区的健康生活干预措施的多层次、多组件方法——三案例比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Oct 20;13(10):1023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13101023.
3
Amplifying Health Through Community Gardens: A Framework for Advancing Multicomponent, Behaviorally Based Neighborhood Interventions.通过社区花园促进健康:推进多组分、基于行为的邻里干预的框架。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2016 Sep;3(3):302-12. doi: 10.1007/s40572-016-0105-0.
4
Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2011-2014.2011 - 2014年美国成年人及青少年肥胖症患病率
NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Nov(219):1-8.
5
Changes in Intake of Fruits and Vegetables and Weight Change in United States Men and Women Followed for Up to 24 Years: Analysis from Three Prospective Cohort Studies.对美国男性和女性长达24年的水果和蔬菜摄入量变化及体重变化跟踪研究:三项前瞻性队列研究分析
PLoS Med. 2015 Sep 22;12(9):e1001878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001878. eCollection 2015 Sep.
6
Exploring ecological, emotional and social levers of self-rated health for urban gardeners and non-gardeners: A path analysis.探索城市园丁和非园丁自评健康的生态、情感和社会影响因素:路径分析
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;144:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
7
NIH working group report: Innovative research to improve maintenance of weight loss.美国国立卫生研究院工作组报告:改善体重减轻维持情况的创新性研究
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Jan;23(1):7-15. doi: 10.1002/oby.20967. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
8
Diet or exercise interventions vs combined behavioral weight management programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct comparisons.饮食或运动干预与综合行为体重管理计划的比较:直接比较的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Oct;114(10):1557-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.07.005.
9
Healthy strategies for successful weight loss and weight maintenance: a systematic review.成功减肥和维持体重的健康策略:一项系统综述。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2014 Jan;39(1):1-20. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2013-0026. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
10
Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias.流行病学中的中介分析:方法、解释和偏倚。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;42(5):1511-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt127. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

园艺与年龄相关的体重增加:丹佛居民横断面调查结果

Gardening and age-related weight gain: Results from a cross-sectional survey of Denver residents.

作者信息

Litt Jill S, Lambert Jeffrey Richard, Glueck Deborah H

机构信息

Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO 80303, United States.

Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, 13001 E. 17th Place, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2017 Nov 2;8:221-225. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.10.018. eCollection 2017 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.10.018
PMID:29159017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5683668/
Abstract

This study examined whether gardening modifies the association between age and body mass index (BMI). We used data from the Neighborhood Environments and Health Survey, which was conducted in Denver (N = 469) between 2006 and 2007. We fit two general linear mixed models. The base model had BMI in kg/m as the outcome, and age, an indicator variable for non-gardening status and the age-by-non-gardening status interaction as predictors. The adjusted model included as covariates the potential confounders of education, ethnicity and self-reported health. We assessed self-selection bias and confounding. BMI was 27.18 kg/m for non-gardeners, 25.62 kg/m for home gardeners, and 24.17 kg/m for community gardeners. In the base model, a statistically significant association was observed between age and BMI for non-gardeners but not for the combined community and home gardening group (F = 9.27, ndf = 1, ddf = 441, p = 0.0025). In the adjusted model, the association between age and BMI in non-gardeners was not statistically significant (F = 1.72, ndf = 1, ddf = 431, p = 0.1908). Gardeners differed on social and demographic factors when compared to non-gardeners. The results from the base model are consistent with the hypothesis that gardening might offset age-related weight gain. However, the cross-sectional design does not permit differentiation of true causal effects from the possible effects of bias and confounding. As a follow-up study, to remove bias and confounding, we are conducting a randomized clinical trial of community gardening in Denver.

摘要

本研究探讨园艺活动是否会改变年龄与体重指数(BMI)之间的关联。我们使用了2006年至2007年在丹佛进行的邻里环境与健康调查数据(N = 469)。我们拟合了两个一般线性混合模型。基础模型以kg/m²为单位的BMI作为结果变量,年龄、非园艺状态的指示变量以及年龄与非园艺状态的交互作用作为预测变量。调整后的模型将教育程度、种族和自我报告的健康状况等潜在混杂因素作为协变量纳入。我们评估了自我选择偏差和混杂因素。非园艺者的BMI为27.18 kg/m²,家庭园艺者为25.62 kg/m²,社区园艺者为24.17 kg/m²。在基础模型中,观察到非园艺者的年龄与BMI之间存在统计学上的显著关联,但社区和家庭园艺者的组合组则不存在这种关联(F = 9.27,分子自由度=1,分母自由度=441,p = 0.0025)。在调整后的模型中,非园艺者的年龄与BMI之间的关联无统计学意义(F = 1.72,分子自由度=1,分母自由度=431,p = 0.1908)。与非园艺者相比,园艺者在社会和人口统计学因素方面存在差异。基础模型的结果与园艺活动可能抵消与年龄相关的体重增加这一假设一致。然而,横断面设计无法区分真正的因果效应与偏差和混杂因素的可能影响。作为后续研究,为了消除偏差和混杂因素,我们正在丹佛进行一项社区园艺的随机临床试验。