Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Cancer. 2018 Feb 15;124(4):833-840. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31117. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
Although larger social networks have been associated with lower all-cause mortality, few studies have examined whether social integration predicts survival outcomes among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The authors examined the association between social ties and survival after CRC diagnosis in a prospective cohort study.
Participants included 896 women in the Nurses' Health Study who were diagnosed with stage I, II, or III CRC between 1992 and 2012. Stage was assigned using the American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria. Social integration was assessed every 4 years since 1992 using the Berkman-Syme Social Network Index, which included marital status, social network size, contact frequency, religious participation, and other social group participation.
During follow-up, there were 380 total deaths, 167 of which were due to CRC. In multivariable analyses, women who were socially integrated before diagnosis had a subsequent reduced risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.46-0.92) and CRC mortality (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.38-1.06) compared with women who were socially isolated. In particular, women with more intimate ties (family and friends) had lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88) and CRC mortality (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.34-1.03) compared with those with few intimate ties. Participation in religious or community activities was not found to be related to outcomes. The analysis of postdiagnosis social integration yielded similar results.
Socially integrated women were found to have better survival after a diagnosis of CRC, possibly due to beneficial caregiving from their family and friends. Interventions aimed at strengthening social network structures to ensure access to care may be valuable programmatic tools in the management of patients with CRC. Cancer 2018;124:833-40. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
尽管更大的社交网络与全因死亡率降低有关,但很少有研究检查社交整合是否能预测结直肠癌(CRC)患者的生存结果。作者在一项前瞻性队列研究中检查了社交关系与 CRC 诊断后生存之间的关联。
参与者包括 1992 年至 2012 年间被诊断患有 I 期、II 期或 III 期 CRC 的 896 名女性护士健康研究。分期使用美国癌症联合委员会标准进行。自 1992 年以来,每 4 年使用 Berkman-Syme 社会网络指数评估社交整合情况,该指数包括婚姻状况、社交网络规模、接触频率、宗教参与度和其他社会团体参与度。
在随访期间,共有 380 例总死亡,其中 167 例死于 CRC。在多变量分析中,与社交孤立的女性相比,诊断前社交整合的女性全因死亡率(风险比 [HR],0.65;95%置信区间 [95%CI],0.46-0.92)和 CRC 死亡率(HR,0.63;95%CI,0.38-1.06)降低。特别是,与亲密关系(家人和朋友)较少的女性相比,具有更高亲密关系的女性全因死亡率(HR,0.61;95%CI,0.42-0.88)和 CRC 死亡率(HR,0.59;95%CI,0.34-1.03)较低。参加宗教或社区活动与结果无关。对诊断后社交整合的分析得出了类似的结果。
诊断为 CRC 后,社交关系良好的女性生存状况较好,这可能是由于其家人和朋友提供了有益的护理。旨在加强社交网络结构以确保获得护理的干预措施可能是 CRC 患者管理中的有价值的计划工具。癌症 2018;124:833-40。©2017 美国癌症协会。