Luo Ting, Wu Xia, Wang Hailing, Fu Shimin
Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):512-526. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1452-0.
Two hypotheses, attentional prioritization and attentional spreading, have been proposed to account for object-based attention. The attentional-prioritization hypothesis posits that the positional uncertainty of targets is sufficient to resolve the controversy raised by the competing attentional-spreading hypothesis. Here we challenge the sufficiency of this explanation by showing that object-based attention is a function of sensory uncertainty in a task with consistent high positional uncertainty of the targets. In Experiment 1, object-based attention was modulated by sensory uncertainty induced by the noise from backward masking, showing an object-based effect under high as compared to low sensory uncertainty. This finding was replicated in Experiment 2 with increased task difficulty, to exclude that as a confounding factor, and in Experiment 3 with a psychophysical method, to obtain converging evidence using perceptual threshold measurement. Additionally, such a finding was not observed when sensory uncertainty was eliminated by replacing the backward-masking stimuli with perceptually dissimilar ones in Experiment 4. These results reveal that object-based attention is influenced by sensory uncertainty, even under high positional uncertainty of the targets. Our findings contradict the proposition of attentional spreading, proposing instead an automatic form of object-based attention due to enhancement of the perceptual representation. More importantly, the attentional-prioritization hypothesis based solely on positional uncertainty cannot sufficiently account for object-based attention, but needs to be developed by expanding the concept of uncertainty to include at least sensory uncertainty.
为了解释基于客体的注意,人们提出了两种假说,即注意优先化假说和注意扩展假说。注意优先化假说认为,目标位置的不确定性足以解决竞争性注意扩展假说所引发的争议。在此,我们通过表明在目标位置不确定性始终很高的任务中,基于客体的注意是感觉不确定性的函数,对这一解释的充分性提出了质疑。在实验1中,基于客体的注意受到后向掩蔽噪声所引发的感觉不确定性的调节,与低感觉不确定性相比,在高感觉不确定性下表现出基于客体的效应。这一发现在实验2中得到了重复,实验2增加了任务难度以排除其作为一个混淆因素的影响,并且在实验3中采用了心理物理学方法,通过感知阈值测量获得了趋同的证据。此外,在实验4中,当用感知上不同的刺激替代后向掩蔽刺激从而消除感觉不确定性时,并未观察到这样的发现。这些结果表明,即使在目标位置不确定性很高的情况下,基于客体的注意也会受到感觉不确定性的影响。我们的发现与注意扩展的观点相矛盾,相反,我们提出了一种基于客体注意的自动形式,这是由于感知表征的增强所致。更重要的是,仅基于位置不确定性的注意优先化假说不足以解释基于客体的注意,而是需要通过将不确定性的概念扩展到至少包括感觉不确定性来加以完善。