Health Services Research & Management Division, School of Health Sciences, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Mar 1;33(2):247-257. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx157.
Almost 172 million people live in complex emergencies globally resulting from political and/or economic instability. The provision and continuity of health care in complex emergencies remain a significant challenge. Health agencies are often hesitant to implement tuberculosis programmes in particular because its treatment requires a longer commitment than most acute diseases. However, not treating tuberculosis promptly increases mortality and untreated tuberculosis further increases the incidence of tuberculosis. Given that complex emergencies are increasing globally, there is an urgent need to analyse the available evidence to improve our understanding of how best to deliver tuberculosis programmes in such settings. Using a scoping review method, we selected and analysed 15 studies on tuberculosis programmes in complex emergencies. We found that despite the challenges, tuberculosis programmes have been successful in complex emergencies. We identified seven cross-cutting factors that were found to be important: service providers and treatment regime, training and supervision, donor support, adherence, leadership and coordination, monitoring and government and community support. In general, programmes showed greater creativity and flexibility to adapt to the local conditions and at times, it also meant diverting from the WHO guidelines. We identify areas of further research including the need to study the effectiveness of programmes that divert from the WHO guidelines and their implication on drug resistance.
全球有近 1.72 亿人生活在政治和/或经济不稳定导致的复杂紧急情况中。在复杂紧急情况下,提供和维持医疗保健仍然是一项重大挑战。卫生机构通常不愿特别实施结核病规划,因为其治疗需要比大多数急性疾病更长的时间承诺。然而,不及时治疗结核病会增加死亡率,未经治疗的结核病会进一步增加结核病的发病率。鉴于全球复杂紧急情况不断增加,迫切需要分析现有证据,以增进我们对如何在这种情况下最好地提供结核病规划的理解。我们使用范围综述方法,选择并分析了 15 项关于复杂紧急情况中结核病规划的研究。我们发现,尽管面临挑战,但结核病规划在复杂紧急情况下取得了成功。我们确定了七个交叉因素,这些因素被认为很重要:服务提供者和治疗方案、培训和监督、捐助者支持、依从性、领导力和协调、监测以及政府和社区支持。总的来说,这些方案表现出更大的创造力和灵活性,以适应当地的情况,有时也意味着偏离世界卫生组织的指南。我们确定了进一步研究的领域,包括需要研究偏离世界卫生组织指南的方案的有效性及其对耐药性的影响。