D.T. Shah is professor of pathology, and associate dean, Office of Faculty Affairs and Professional Development, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, West Virginia. She is past chair (2016-2018), Association of American Medical Colleges Group on Faculty Affairs. V.N. Williams is Presidential Professor, Graduate College, and vice provost for academic affairs and faculty development, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. She is former associate dean for faculty affairs, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. She is past chair (2007-2008), Association of American Medical Colleges Group on Faculty Affairs. L.E. Thorndyke is professor of medicine and vice provost for faculty affairs, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. She is past chair (2012-2013), Association of American Medical Colleges Group on Faculty Affairs. E.E. Marsh is professor of neurology and professor, Department of Educational Affairs, Penn State College of Medicine, University Park Regional Campus, State College, Pennsylvania. He is a steering committee member, Association of American Medical Colleges Group on Faculty Affairs. R.E. Sonnino is professor of pediatric surgery (retired), Department of Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. She is past chair (2014-2015), Association of American Medical Colleges Group on Faculty Affairs. S.M. Block is professor of pediatrics, emeritus, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. He is past chair (2013-2014), Association of American Medical Colleges Group on Faculty Affairs. T.R. Viggiano is Barbara Woodward Lips Professor of Medical Education and Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. He is the founding chair (2006-2007), Association of American Medical Colleges Group on Faculty Affairs.
Acad Med. 2018 Jul;93(7):979-984. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002013.
Increasing rates of burnout-with accompanying stress and lack of engagement-among faculty, residents, students, and practicing physicians have caused alarm in academic medicine. Central to the debate among academic medicine's stakeholders are oft-competing issues of social accountability; cost containment; effectiveness of academic medicine's institutions; faculty recruitment, retention, and satisfaction; increasing expectations for faculty; and mission-based productivity.The authors propose that understanding and fostering what contributes to faculty and institutional vitality is central to preventing burnout during times of change. They first look at faculty vitality and how it is threatened by burnout, to provide a framework for a greater understanding of faculty well-being. Then they draw on higher education literature to determine how vitality is defined in academic settings and what factors affect faculty vitality within the context of academic medicine. Next, they propose a model to explain and examine faculty vitality in academic medicine, followed by a discussion of the need for a greater understanding of faculty vitality. Finally, the authors offer conclusions and propose future directions to promote faculty vitality.The authors encourage institutional decision makers and other stakeholders to focus particular attention on the evolving expectations for faculty, the risk of extensive faculty burnout, and the opportunity to reduce burnout by improving the vitality and resilience of these talented and crucial contributors. Faculty vitality, as defined by the institution, has a critical role in ensuring future institutional successes and the capacity for faculty to thrive in a complex health care economy.
在医学学术界,教职员工、住院医师、医学生和执业医生的职业倦怠率(伴随而来的是压力和缺乏投入)不断上升,引起了人们的警觉。在医学学术利益相关者的争论中,核心问题往往是相互竞争的社会责任、成本控制、学术机构的有效性、教职员工的招聘、留用和满意度、对教职员工的期望增加以及以使命为基础的生产力。作者认为,了解和培养有助于教职员工和机构活力的因素,对于在变革时期预防职业倦怠至关重要。他们首先探讨了教职员工的活力以及职业倦怠如何威胁到这种活力,为更深入地了解教职员工的健康提供了一个框架。然后,他们借鉴高等教育文献,确定了在学术环境中活力的定义,以及在医学学术背景下影响教职员工活力的因素。接下来,他们提出了一个解释和考察医学学术领域教职员工活力的模型,随后讨论了更深入了解教职员工活力的必要性。最后,作者提出了结论,并提出了未来的方向,以促进教职员工的活力。作者鼓励机构决策者和其他利益相关者特别关注教职员工的期望不断演变、广泛的教职员工倦怠风险,以及通过提高这些有才华和至关重要的贡献者的活力和适应力来减少倦怠的机会。机构所定义的教职员工活力在确保未来机构的成功和教职员工在复杂的医疗保健经济中茁壮成长方面具有关键作用。