Suppr超能文献

安全带使用法律中的覆盖漏洞。

Coverage gaps in seat belt use laws.

作者信息

Wells J K, Williams A F, Fields M

机构信息

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Washington, DC 20037.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1989 Mar;79(3):332-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.3.332.

Abstract

Some seat belt use laws exempt occupants in certain seating positions and in certain types of vehicles, or both. A state-by-state analysis was conducted of the extent to which passenger vehicle occupants killed before the laws went into effect would have been covered by the laws subsequently passed. Only five states had laws that covered all passenger vehicle occupants; the majority excluded 4 to 8 per cent and six states excluded 14 per cent or more. More inclusive laws can reduce injuries and save lives.

摘要

一些安全带使用法规豁免了某些座位位置和某些类型车辆中的乘客,或两者皆豁免。对法律生效前死亡的乘用车乘客在随后通过的法律中被涵盖的程度进行了逐州分析。只有五个州的法律涵盖了所有乘用车乘客;大多数州排除了4%至8%的乘客,六个州排除了14%或更多。更具包容性的法律可以减少伤害并挽救生命。

相似文献

1
Coverage gaps in seat belt use laws.安全带使用法律中的覆盖漏洞。
Am J Public Health. 1989 Mar;79(3):332-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.3.332.
2
Child restraint laws: an analysis of gaps in coverage.儿童约束法律:覆盖范围差距分析
Am J Public Health. 1986 Jan;76(1):31-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.1.31.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验