• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey.瑞士全科医生如何认同并报告遵守五项不必要的检查和治疗清单?一项横断面调查的结果。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):32-38. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1395018. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
2
Why do GPs continue inappropriate hospital prescriptions of proton pump inhibitors? A qualitative study.全科医生为何持续开出不恰当的质子泵抑制剂医院处方?一项定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Sep;20(3):174-80. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2013.844787. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
3
Sickness certification in primary care: a survey on views and practices among Swiss physicians.初级保健中的疾病证明:瑞士医生观点与实践的调查
Swiss Med Wkly. 2015 Nov 20;145:w14201. doi: 10.4414/smw.2015.14201. eCollection 2015.
4
[The general practitioner's knowledge and attitude towards proton pump inhibitors adverse effects].[全科医生对质子泵抑制剂不良反应的认知与态度]
Therapie. 2020 May-Jun;75(3):253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Knowledge, attitude and practice of Gambian health practitioners towards antibiotic prescribing and microbiological testing: a cross-sectional survey.冈比亚医疗从业者对抗生素处方和微生物检测的知识、态度及实践:一项横断面调查。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Mar 1;111(3):117-124. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trx027.
6
[Analysis of the use of proton pump inhibitors in primary health care].[基层医疗中质子泵抑制剂的使用分析]
Semergen. 2018 Jul-Aug;44(5):316-322. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
7
Prescribing of proton pump inhibitors for gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in the Lebanese outpatient setting: patterns, compliance with guidelines and risks.黎巴嫩门诊环境中用于预防胃肠道出血的质子泵抑制剂的处方:模式、指南遵循情况及风险
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Aug;27(4):386-392. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12537. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
8
[Evaluation of the prescription of proton pump inhibitors in persons aged 75years and older in a geriatric acute-care unit].[老年急性护理病房中75岁及以上老年人质子泵抑制剂处方的评估]
Therapie. 2017 Dec;72(6):669-675. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
9
[Impact of an evaluation of the professional practices on the relevance of proton pump inhibitors prescriptions pertinence at the hospital].[专业实践评估对医院质子泵抑制剂处方相关性的影响]
Rev Med Interne. 2018 Aug;39(8):618-626. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
10
Using theory to improve low back pain care in Australian Aboriginal primary care: a mixed method single cohort pilot study.运用理论改善澳大利亚原住民初级保健中的腰痛护理:一项混合方法单队列试点研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 12;17:44. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0441-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Presenting a Quaternary Prevention Model for the Rural Family Physician Program in Iran with an Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach.运用解释结构模型方法为伊朗农村家庭医生项目提出一种四级预防模型。
Int J Prev Med. 2023 Aug 28;14:108. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_116_22. eCollection 2023.
2
Management of acute non-specific low back pain in the emergency department: do emergency physicians follow the guidelines? Results of a cross-sectional survey.急诊科急性非特异性下腰痛的管理:急诊医生是否遵循指南?一项横断面调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 4;13(8):e071893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071893.
3
Low-Value Care: Convergence and Challenges Comment on "Key Factors That Promote Low-Value Care: Views From Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands".低价值医疗:趋同与挑战 对《促进低价值医疗的关键因素:来自美国、加拿大和荷兰专家的观点》的评论
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2762-2764. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7017.
4
Organizational influences on the use of low-value care in primary health care - a qualitative interview study with physicians in Sweden.组织对初级保健中低价值医疗的使用的影响 - 瑞典医生的定性访谈研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Dec;40(4):426-437. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2139467. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Strategies for de-implementation of low-value care-a scoping review.去执行低价值医疗的策略:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 27;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01247-y.
6
Identifying and prioritizing do-not-do recommendations in Dutch primary care.确定荷兰初级保健中不建议做的事项并排出优先顺序。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 3;23(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01713-y.
7
Determinants of clinical practice guidelines' utilization for the management of musculoskeletal disorders: a scoping review.用于肌肉骨骼疾病管理的临床实践指南使用的决定因素:范围综述。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 1;22(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04204-w.
8
Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review.医疗保健中低价值医疗使用与停用的决定因素:一项范围综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Feb 4;2(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00110-3.
9
Lansoprazole for persistent throat symptoms in secondary care: the TOPPITS RCT.二级保健中兰索拉唑治疗持续性咽喉症状的随机对照试验(TOPPITS RCT)
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jan;25(3):1-118. doi: 10.3310/hta25030.
10
Time Trends and Factors Associated with Antibiotic Prescribing in Swiss Primary Care (2008 to 2020).瑞士初级保健中抗生素处方的时间趋势及相关因素(2008年至2020年)
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Nov 23;9(11):837. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9110837.

本文引用的文献

1
Physician perceptions of Choosing Wisely and drivers of overuse.医生对“明智选择”及过度医疗驱动因素的看法。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 May;22(5):337-43.
2
[Choosing wisely in internal medicine].[内科领域的明智选择]
Internist (Berl). 2016 Jun;57(6):521-6. doi: 10.1007/s00108-016-0062-6.
3
Choosing Wisely in Emergency Medicine: A National Survey of Emergency Medicine Academic Chairs and Division Chiefs.急诊医学中的明智选择:一项针对急诊医学学术主任和科室主任的全国性调查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;22(12):1506-10. doi: 10.1111/acem.12821. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
4
Early Trends Among Seven Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign.早期趋势在明智选择运动的七个建议中。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1913-20. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5441.
5
Establishment of a Representative Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) for the Monitoring of Primary Care in Switzerland.建立一个用于监测瑞士初级保健的具有代表性的基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):673-5. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150110.
6
Clinical Decisions Made in Primary Care Clinics Before and After Choosing Wisely.明智选择前后基层医疗诊所做出的临床决策
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;28(4):471-4. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.140332.
7
Measuring the effect of Choosing Wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value care.衡量明智选择的效果:评估运动对低价值医疗的影响的综合框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):523-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004070. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
The challenge of overdiagnosis begins with its definition.过度诊断的挑战始于其定义。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 4;350:h869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h869.
9
Appropriateness of diagnostic coronary angiography as a measure of cardiac ischemia testing in non-emergency patients - a retrospective cross-sectional analysis.诊断性冠状动脉造影作为非急诊患者心脏缺血检测手段的适宜性——一项回顾性横断面分析
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 26;10(2):e0117172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117172. eCollection 2015.
10
Creating a list of low-value health care activities in Swiss primary care.创建瑞士初级医疗保健中低价值医疗保健活动清单。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Apr;175(4):640-2. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8111.

瑞士全科医生如何认同并报告遵守五项不必要的检查和治疗清单?一项横断面调查的结果。

How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey.

机构信息

a Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine , University of Lausanne , Lausanne , Switzerland.

b Division of Research , Kaiser Permanente Northern California , Oakland , CA , USA.

出版信息

Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):32-38. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1395018. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1080/13814788.2017.1395018
PMID:29168409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5795744/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2014, the 'Smarter Medicine' campaign released a top five list of unnecessary tests and treatments in Swiss primary care, such as imaging for acute low-back pain and long-term prescribing of proton pump inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES

Measure general practitioners' (GPs) agreement with the recommendations and self-reported adherence.

METHODS

Cross-sectional, online survey of GPs in the 'Swiss primary care active monitoring' (SPAM) network, which assessed awareness of 'Smarter Medicine' and views on each recommendation. Questions included whether the clinical situation is common, whether the recommendation is followed, whether GPs agree with the recommendation and reasons why the recommendation would not be followed.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-sixty-seven of 277 GPs from the SPAM network participated (60%), of which 104 (62%) knew of 'Smarter Medicine', including 79% in German areas, 49% in French areas and 38% in Italian areas (P < 0.001). Agreement with the five recommendations was high, with scores around nine out of 10. The proportion saying they typically follow each recommendation was 68 to 74%, except not continuing long-term PPI prescriptions without attempting dose reduction, with only 34%. Common reasons for not following the recommendations were patient or other provider requests and situations that might suggest the need for more aggressive care.

CONCLUSION

Two years after the launch of the campaign, awareness and acceptance of 'Smarter Medicine' appear to be high among Swiss GPs. By self-report, the recommendations are adhered to by most of the respondents but there may be room for improvement, especially for long-term PPI prescriptions.

摘要

背景

2014 年,“更明智的医疗”运动发布了瑞士初级保健中不必要的五项测试和治疗清单,例如急性腰痛的影像学检查和质子泵抑制剂的长期处方。

目的

衡量全科医生(GP)对这些建议的认同度和自我报告的依从性。

方法

采用横断面、在线调查瑞士初级保健主动监测(SPAM)网络中的全科医生,评估他们对“更明智的医疗”的认识以及对每项建议的看法。问题包括临床情况是否常见、建议是否遵循、GP 是否认同建议以及不遵循建议的原因。

结果

来自 SPAM 网络的 277 名全科医生中有 167 名(60%)参与了调查,其中 104 名(62%)知道“更明智的医疗”,包括德语区的 79%、法语区的 49%和意大利语区的 38%(P<0.001)。对这五条建议的认同度很高,评分接近十分之九。表示通常遵循每条建议的比例为 68%至 74%,但不减少剂量就继续长期使用质子泵抑制剂的比例仅为 34%。不遵循建议的常见原因是患者或其他提供者的要求以及可能需要更积极治疗的情况。

结论

在运动发起两年后,瑞士全科医生对“更明智的医疗”的认识和接受度似乎很高。根据自我报告,大多数受访者都遵守了这些建议,但可能仍有改进的空间,尤其是对于长期使用质子泵抑制剂的情况。