• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用共同生产原则改善患者护理并提升价值。

Using Principles of Co-Production to Improve Patient Care and Enhance Value.

作者信息

Turakhia Puja, Combs Brandon

机构信息

an associate professor of medicine at the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Aurora, Colorado, and a senior fellow for medical education at the Lown Institute.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):1125-1131. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.11.pfor1-1711.

DOI:10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.11.pfor1-1711
PMID:29168684
Abstract

Unlike goods, which are concrete and easily quantified, services are intangible processes that are produced and consumed concurrently. Health care is a service that can encourage optimal health outcomes only through meaningful, collaborative partnerships between patients and clinicians. Co-production of health services can be used as a means to rethink how health care is delivered not only in the context of face-to-face encounters in which the benefits of working together are obvious, but also in designing systems that can improve patient care and enhance value.

摘要

与具体且易于量化的商品不同,服务是无形的过程,是在生产的同时被消费。医疗保健是一种只有通过患者与临床医生之间有意义的合作关系才能促进实现最佳健康结果的服务。卫生服务的共同生产可作为一种手段,不仅在面对面接触(其中合作的益处显而易见)的背景下重新思考医疗保健的提供方式,而且在设计能够改善患者护理并提升价值的系统时也可如此。

相似文献

1
Using Principles of Co-Production to Improve Patient Care and Enhance Value.运用共同生产原则改善患者护理并提升价值。
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):1125-1131. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.11.pfor1-1711.
2
What Should Leaders Do When Inefficiency Is Perceived as a Cost of Inclusivity in Strategic Planning Processes in Health Care?当在医疗保健战略规划过程中,低效率被视为包容性的代价时,领导者应该怎么做?
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):1081-1087. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.11.ecas2-1711.
3
The impact of status and social context on health service co-design: an example from a collaborative improvement initiative in UK primary care.地位和社会背景对医疗服务共同设计的影响:来自英国初级保健合作改善计划的一个例子。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0608-5.
4
What does the medical profession mean by "standard of care?".医学专业所说的“护理标准”是什么意思?
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):e192-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6678. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
5
The High Stakes of Outsourcing in Health Care.医疗保健领域外包的高风险。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Nov;96(11):2879-2890. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
6
Service improvement in health care: a literature review.医疗保健中的服务改进:文献综述
Br J Nurs. 2018 Aug 9;27(15):893-896. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.15.893.
7
The Medical Motorway: improving the quality of care in the context of an ageing population.医疗高速公路:在人口老龄化背景下提高医疗质量。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2015;28(1):5-7. doi: 10.1108/LHS-06-2014-0049.
8
Assessment for improvement: a view from the coal face.改进评估:一线视角
Hosp Med. 2005 May;66(5):260-1. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2005.66.5.18416.
9
Patient Centeredness and Engagement in Quality-of-Care Oncology Research.以患者为中心及参与肿瘤护理质量研究
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):176-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.003749. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
10
How Co-Creation Helped Address Hierarchy, Overwhelmed Patients, and Conflicts of Interest in Health Care Quality and Safety.共同创造如何有助于解决医疗质量与安全方面的等级制度、不堪重负的患者以及利益冲突问题。
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):1139-1145. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.11.mhst1-1711.

引用本文的文献

1
My A-T pack: a qualitative study of the utility, acceptability, design, and content of a family-designed and owned information pack relevant to the lives of children and young people living with ataxia telangiectasia.我的共济失调毛细血管扩张症信息包:一项关于家庭设计并拥有的、与患有共济失调毛细血管扩张症的儿童和年轻人生活相关的信息包的效用、可接受性、设计和内容的定性研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Aug 4;20(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03919-6.
2
Developing methods to identify resilience and improve communication about diagnosis in pediatric primary care.开发在儿科初级保健中识别恢复力并改善诊断沟通的方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 30;11:1414892. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1414892. eCollection 2024.
3
Living with Dysphagia: A Survey Exploring the Experiences of Adults Living with Neuromuscular Disease and their Caregivers in the United Kingdom.
吞咽困难患者的生活:一项关于英国神经肌肉疾病成年患者及其照顾者经历的调查
J Neuromuscul Dis. 2024;11(2):389-410. doi: 10.3233/JND-230002.
4
A scoping review of the evidence available for the use of salons as health promotion environments, for the prevention and management of non-communicable diseases in women from different ethnic backgrounds.以不同族裔背景的女性为对象,针对沙龙用作促进健康环境、预防和管理非传染性疾病的用途,对现有证据进行的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 17;11:1161645. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1161645. eCollection 2023.
5
Improving heart failure care with an Experience-Based Co-Design approach: what matters to persons with heart failure and their family members?采用基于经验的共同设计方法改善心力衰竭护理:心力衰竭患者及其家庭成员关心的是什么?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09306-w.
6
"Nothing for Us Without Us": An Evaluation of Patient Engagement in an HIV Care Improvement Collaborative in the Caribbean.“没有我们就没有我们”:加勒比地区艾滋病毒护理改善协作中患者参与情况的评估。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Jun 29;10(3). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00390.
7
Key stakeholders' experiences and expectations of the care system for individuals affected by borderline personality disorder: An interpretative phenomenological analysis towards co-production of care.关键利益相关者对边缘型人格障碍个体照护系统的体验和期望:共创照护的阐释现象学分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0274197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274197. eCollection 2022.
8
How argumentation theory can inform assessment validity: A critical review.论证理论如何为评估效度提供信息:批判性评价。
Med Educ. 2022 Nov;56(11):1064-1075. doi: 10.1111/medu.14882. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
9
A lasting impact? Exploring the immediate and longitudinal impact of an emergency department service learning help desk program.持久影响?探索急诊科服务学习咨询台项目的即时影响和长期影响。
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Jun 1;6(3):e10760. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10760. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Co-Produce, Co-Design, Co-Create, or Co-Construct-Who Does It and How Is It Done in Chronic Disease Prevention? A Scoping Review.共同生产、共同设计、共同创造或共同构建——谁来做以及如何在慢性病预防中实施?一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 30;10(4):647. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040647.