• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无菌水注射用于肾绞痛镇痛:一级证据的荟萃分析。

Sterile water injections for analgesia in renal colic: a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence.

作者信息

Perros Ioannis, Sokhal Balamrit Singh, Swift Christopher, Kitchen Mark, Mallen Christian, Somani Bhaskar

机构信息

School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.

Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospital of North Midlands, Stoke-On-Trent, UK.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2025 Sep 16;43(1):557. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05920-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-025-05920-x
PMID:40956348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12441071/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of Sterile water injections (SWIs) for acute pain relief in renal colic.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SWIs with placebo or other analgesics in renal colic patients. Data were pooled and analysed using random effects modelling with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Six RCTs including 1322 renal colic patients were included, with 466 (35.2%) receiving SWIs. Patients receiving SWIs had comparable demographics and presenting features to the control groups, with control medications ranging from placebos, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, and opioids. Self-reported pain scores at 30 min following intervention were lower in SWI than placebo (MD = - 4.63, 95% CI: - 5.16, - 4.10, P < 0.001) and other analgesics (MD = - 0.36, 95% CI: - 0.52, - 0.21, P < 0.001). The use of rescue analgesia was lower in those receiving SWIs compared to placebo (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.59, P = 0.002) and other analgesics (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.74, P = 0.001). No significant side effects were attributed to SWI use.

CONCLUSIONS

SWIs demonstrated superior pain relief and reduced rescue analgesia requirements, compared to placebo and standard treatment, offering a promising alternative for patients where traditional options are unsuitable.

摘要

目的

评估无菌水注射(SWIs)缓解肾绞痛急性疼痛的有效性。

方法

本研究按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目进行。检索MEDLINE、CINAHL、科学网和Cochrane数据库,以确定比较SWIs与安慰剂或其他镇痛药治疗肾绞痛患者的随机对照试验(RCTs)。使用随机效应模型和95%置信区间(CIs)对数据进行汇总和分析。

结果

纳入6项RCTs,共1322例肾绞痛患者,其中466例(35.2%)接受SWIs治疗。接受SWIs治疗的患者与对照组在人口统计学和临床表现特征方面具有可比性,对照药物包括安慰剂、非甾体抗炎药和阿片类药物。干预后30分钟时,SWIs组的自我报告疼痛评分低于安慰剂组(MD=-4.63,95%CI:-5.16,-4.10,P<0.001)和其他镇痛药组(MD=-0.36,95%CI:-0.52,-0.21,P<0.001)。与安慰剂组(OR=0.24,95%CI:0.10,0.59,P=0.002)和其他镇痛药组(OR=0.46,95%CI:0.29,0.74,P=0.001)相比,接受SWIs治疗的患者使用解救镇痛药的情况较少。未发现SWIs使用有明显副作用。

结论

与安慰剂和标准治疗相比,SWIs在缓解疼痛方面表现更优,且减少了解救镇痛药的使用需求,为传统治疗方法不适用的患者提供了一个有前景的替代选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6158/12441071/d089af03a330/345_2025_5920_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6158/12441071/87d7d3a19b95/345_2025_5920_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6158/12441071/d1995f288a22/345_2025_5920_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6158/12441071/d089af03a330/345_2025_5920_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6158/12441071/87d7d3a19b95/345_2025_5920_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6158/12441071/d1995f288a22/345_2025_5920_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6158/12441071/d089af03a330/345_2025_5920_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sterile water injections for analgesia in renal colic: a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence.无菌水注射用于肾绞痛镇痛:一级证据的荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2025 Sep 16;43(1):557. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05920-x.
2
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and non-opioids for acute renal colic.非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和非阿片类药物用于急性肾绞痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 29;2015(6):CD006027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006027.pub2.
3
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for acute renal colic.用于急性肾绞痛的非甾体抗炎药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 14;3(3):CD006027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006027.pub3.
4
Intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injection compared with blinded controls for pain management in labour.皮内或皮下注射无菌水与盲法对照用于分娩疼痛管理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD009107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009107.pub2.
5
Pain relief for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing colposcopy treatment.接受阴道镜检查治疗的宫颈上皮内瘤变女性的疼痛缓解。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD006120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006120.pub3.
6
Oral analgesia for relieving post-caesarean pain.口服镇痛用于缓解剖宫产术后疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 29;2015(3):CD010450. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010450.pub2.
7
Effectiveness and tolerability of pharmacologic and combined interventions for reducing injection pain during routine childhood immunizations: systematic review and meta-analyses.药物及联合干预措施在减轻儿童常规免疫接种时注射疼痛方面的有效性和耐受性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Ther. 2009;31 Suppl 2:S104-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.001.
8
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.分娩期女性的疼痛管理:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
9
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.分娩过程中疼痛管理的催眠疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.
10
Pain relief for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing colposcopy treatment.接受阴道镜检查治疗的宫颈上皮内瘤变女性的疼痛缓解。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 18;7(7):CD006120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006120.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis.欧洲泌尿外科学会尿石症诊断和治疗指南
Eur Urol. 2025 Jul;88(1):64-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.011. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
2
Sterile water injections for back pain in labour.分娩时用于缓解背痛的无菌水注射。
BMJ. 2024 Jun 3;385:q1187. doi: 10.1136/bmj.q1187.
3
Intradermal Sterile Water Injection: Safe and Effective Alternative for Relief of Acute Renal Colic in the Emergency Department.皮内注射无菌用水:急诊科缓解急性肾绞痛的安全有效替代方法。
J Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;66(2):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.10.014. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Caesarean delivery rates and analgesia effectiveness following injections of sterile water for back pain in labour: A multicentre, randomised placebo controlled trial.分娩时注射无菌水治疗背痛后的剖宫产率及镇痛效果:一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jul 3;25:100447. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100447. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Intradermal sterile water injection versus diclofenac sodium in acute renal colic pain: A randomized controlled trial.急性肾绞痛中皮内注射无菌水与双氯芬酸钠的对比:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;44:395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.079. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
8
Comparing Intradermal Sterile Water with Intravenous Morphine in Reducing Pain in Patients with Renal Colic: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.比较皮内注射无菌用水与静脉注射吗啡减轻肾绞痛患者疼痛的效果:一项双盲随机临床试验。
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2020;15(1):76-82. doi: 10.2174/1574887114666191118153600.
9
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
10
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.