Suppr超能文献

精英美式橄榄球训练中跑动和非跑动活动的位置差异。

Positional Differences in Running and Nonrunning Activities During Elite American Football Training.

机构信息

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Ramsden Sports Performance.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jul;32(7):2072-2084. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002294.

Abstract

Ward, PA, Ramsden, S, Coutts, AJ, Hulton, AT, and Drust, B. Positional differences in running and nonrunning activities during elite American football training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2017-The aim of this investigation was to describe differences in training loads between position groups within professional American football. Integrated micro technology data were collected on 63 NFL football players during an American football training camp. Five key metrics (total distance, high-speed distance, player load (PL), PL per minute, and total inertial movement analysis [IMA]) served to quantify both running and nonrunning activities. Players were classified into position groups (defensive back [DB], defensive linemen [DL], linebacker, offensive linemen [OL], quarterback, running back, tight end, and wide receiver [WR]). Training sessions were identified by their relationship to the upcoming match (e.g., -4, -3, and -2). Running and nonrunning activities varied between position groups relative to the training day. Differences in total distance between DB and WR were observed to be unclear across the 3 training days (game day [GD] -4: 74 ± 392 m; GD -3: -122 ± 348 m; and GD -2: -222 ± 371 m). However, moderate to large differences were observed between these 2 positions and the other positional groups. A similar relationship was observed in PL and PL per minute, with the DB and WR groups performing greater amounts of load compared with other positional groups. Differences in high-speed distance varied across positional groups, indicating different outputs based on ergonomic demands. The OL and DL groups ran less but engaged in a higher amount of nonrunning activities (total IMA) with differences ranging from moderate to large across the 3 training days. Total IMA differences between offensive and defensive linemen were unclear on GD -4 (-4 ± 9) and GD -2 (-2 ± 8) and likely moderate on GD -3 (-9 ± 9). Positional differences with regard to running and nonrunning activities highlight the existence of position-specific training within a training microcycle. In addition, total IMA provides a useful metric for quantifying sport-specific movements within the game of American football.

摘要

沃德、拉姆齐、考茨、赫尔顿和德鲁斯特。美式橄榄球训练中跑动和非跑动活动的位置差异。《力量与调节研究杂志》XX(X):000-000,2017 年——本研究旨在描述职业美式橄榄球中不同位置组之间的训练负荷差异。在一个美式足球训练营期间,对 63 名 NFL 足球运动员使用集成微技术数据进行了收集。五个关键指标(总距离、高速距离、球员负荷(PL)、PL 每分钟和总惯性运动分析(IMA))用于量化跑动和非跑动活动。球员被分为防守后卫(DB)、防守线卫(DL)、线卫、进攻线卫(OL)、四分卫、跑卫、紧身锋和外接手(WR)。训练课程根据与即将到来的比赛的关系进行分类(例如,-4、-3 和-2)。相对于训练日,跑动和非跑动活动因位置组而异。在三天的训练日中,DB 和 WR 之间的总距离差异不太明显(比赛日[GD]-4:74±392m;GD-3:-122±348m;GD-2:-222±371m)。然而,与其他位置组相比,这两个位置之间存在较大差异。在 PL 和 PL 每分钟方面也观察到类似的关系,与其他位置组相比,DB 和 WR 组的负荷量更大。高速距离的差异因位置组而异,这表明根据人体工程学要求有不同的输出。OL 和 DL 组跑动较少,但进行了更多的非跑动活动(总 IMA),在三天的训练中,差异范围从中度到较大。进攻和防守线卫之间的总 IMA 差异在 GD-4 上不明显(-4±9),在 GD-2 上也不明显(-2±8),在 GD-3 上可能是中度的(-9±9)。跑动和非跑动活动的位置差异突出了特定位置训练在训练微周期中的存在。此外,总 IMA 为量化美式足球比赛中的特定运动提供了有用的指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验