Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Department of Athletics, Basketball Strength and Performance, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Feb 24;19(1):204-212. eCollection 2020 Mar.
Limited research has paralleled concomitant changes in external training load (eTL) and countermovement jump (CMJ) performance. Therefore, this investigation characterized eTL and CMJ performance changes across preseason training in Division 1 male collegiate basketball athletes, while examining the influence of position (Guard vs. Forward/Center) and scholarship status (Scholarship = S vs. Walk-on = WO). During 22 practices, eTL was monitored in 14 male athletes, with weekly CMJs performed to quantify neuromuscular performance (Jump Height [JH], Flight Time:Contraction Time [FT:CT], Reactive Strength Index Modified [RSI ]). PlayerLoad per minute was significantly higher during W1 and W2 (5.4 ± 1.3au and 5.3 ± 1.2au, respectively; p < 0.05) compared to subsequent weeks, but no additional differences in eTL parameters across time were observed. Scholarship athletes displayed greater PlayerLoad (S = 777.1 ± 35.6, WO = 530.1 ± 56.20; Inertial Movement Analysis (IMA) IMA_High (S = 70.9 ± 15.2, WO = 41.3 ± 15.2); IMA_Medium (S = 159.9 ± 30.7, WO = 92.7 ± 30.6); and IMA_Low (S = 700.6 ± 105.1, WO = 405 ± 105.0;) (p < 0.05), with no observed differences in eTL by position. Moderate decreases in FT:CT and RSI paralleled increased eTL. Significant increases in practice intensity (W1 and W2) did not impact CMJ performance, suggesting athletes could cope with the prescribed training loads. However, moderate perturbations in FT:CT and RSI paralleled the weeks with intensified training. Cumulatively, scholarship status appears to influence eTL while player position does not.
有限的研究与外部训练负荷(eTL)和反跳(CMJ)表现的同时变化相平行。因此,本研究描述了在 1 级男子大学生篮球运动员的季前训练中 eTL 和 CMJ 表现的变化,同时检查了位置(后卫与前锋/中锋)和奖学金状态(奖学金= S 与步行者= WO)的影响。在 22 次练习中,对 14 名男性运动员进行了 eTL 监测,每周进行 CMJ 以量化神经肌肉表现(跳跃高度[JH],飞行时间:收缩时间[FT:CT],改良反应强度指数[RSI])。与随后的几周相比,W1 和 W2 的 PlayerLoad 每分钟显着更高(分别为 5.4 ± 1.3au 和 5.3 ± 1.2au;p <0.05),但未观察到 eTL 参数随时间的其他差异。奖学金运动员的 PlayerLoad 更大(S = 777.1 ± 35.6,WO = 530.1 ± 56.20;惯性运动分析(IMA)IMA_High(S = 70.9 ± 15.2,WO = 41.3 ± 15.2);IMA_Medium(S = 159.9 ± 30.7,WO = 92.7 ± 30.6);和 IMA_Low(S = 700.6 ± 105.1,WO = 405 ± 105.0;)(p <0.05),位置对 eTL 没有观察到差异。FT:CT 和 RSI 的适度下降与 eTL 的增加平行。练习强度(W1 和 W2)的显着增加并未影响 CMJ 表现,这表明运动员可以承受规定的训练负荷。然而,FT:CT 和 RSI 的适度干扰与强化训练周平行。总之,奖学金状况似乎会影响 eTL,而球员位置则不会。