• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对放射治疗计划系统,评估乳腺切线野建成区剂量计算的准确性。

Assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation in the build-up region of the tangential field of the breast for a radiotherapy treatment planning system.

作者信息

Farhood Bagher, Bahreyni Toossi Mohammad Taghi, Soleymanifard Shokouhozaman, Mortezazadeh Tohid

机构信息

Medical Physics and Medical Engineering Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Medical Physics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2017;21(3):232-239. doi: 10.5114/wo.2017.70114. Epub 2017 Sep 29.

DOI:10.5114/wo.2017.70114
PMID:29180932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5701585/
Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY

Our objective was to quantify the accuracy of dose calculation in the build-up region of the tangential field of the breast for a TiGRT treatment planning system (TPS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) chips were arranged in a RANDO phantom for the dose measurement. TiGRT TPS was also used for the dose calculation. Finally, confidence limit values were obtained to quantify the accuracy of the dose calculation of the TPS at the build-up region.

RESULTS

In the open field, for gantry angles of 15°, 30°, and 60°, the confidence limit values were 17.68, 19.97, and 34.62 at a depth of 5 mm, and 24.01, 19.07, and 15.74 at a depth of 15 mm, respectively. In the wedge field, for gantry angles of 15°, 30°, and 60°, the confidence limit values were 21.64, 26.80, and 34.87 at a depth of 5 mm, and 27.92, 22.04, and 20.03 at a depth of 15 mm, respectively. Additionally, the findings showed that at a depth of 5 mm, the confidence limit values increased with increasing gantry angle while at a depth of 15 mm, the confidence limit values decreased with increasing gantry angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, TiGRT TPS overestimated doses compared to TLD measurements, and the confidence limit values were greater for the wedge field than for the open fields. Our findings suggest that the assessment of dose distributions in large-dose gradient regions (i.e. build-up region) should not entirely rely on TPS calculations.

摘要

研究目的

我们的目标是量化用于TiGRT治疗计划系统(TPS)的乳腺切线野建成区剂量计算的准确性。

材料与方法

将热释光剂量计(TLD)芯片布置在RANDO体模中进行剂量测量。TiGRT TPS也用于剂量计算。最后,获得置信限值以量化TPS在建成区剂量计算的准确性。

结果

在开放野中,对于15°、30°和60°的机架角度,在5 mm深度处的置信限值分别为17.68、19.97和34.62,在15 mm深度处分别为24.01、19.07和15.74。在楔形野中,对于15°、30°和60°的机架角度,在5 mm深度处的置信限值分别为21.64、26.80和34.87,在15 mm深度处分别为27.92、22.04和20.03。此外,研究结果表明,在5 mm深度处,置信限值随机架角度增加而增加,而在15 mm深度处,置信限值随机架角度增加而降低。

结论

总体而言,与TLD测量相比,TiGRT TPS高估了剂量,并且楔形野的置信限值大于开放野。我们的研究结果表明,在大剂量梯度区域(即建成区)评估剂量分布不应完全依赖于TPS计算。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/5701585/b133717a137b/WO-21-30595-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/5701585/0b6386fbe2e8/WO-21-30595-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/5701585/1171b9c57601/WO-21-30595-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/5701585/ced4fd5fe97a/WO-21-30595-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/5701585/b133717a137b/WO-21-30595-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/5701585/0b6386fbe2e8/WO-21-30595-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/5701585/1171b9c57601/WO-21-30595-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/5701585/ced4fd5fe97a/WO-21-30595-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/5701585/b133717a137b/WO-21-30595-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation in the build-up region of the tangential field of the breast for a radiotherapy treatment planning system.针对放射治疗计划系统,评估乳腺切线野建成区剂量计算的准确性。
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2017;21(3):232-239. doi: 10.5114/wo.2017.70114. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
2
Assessment the accuracy of dose calculation in build-up region for two radiotherapy treatment planning systems.评估两种放射治疗计划系统在建成区剂量计算的准确性。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2017 Oct-Dec;13(6):968-973. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.176421.
3
Evaluation of dose calculations accuracy of a commercial treatment planning system for the head and neck region in radiotherapy.放疗中用于头颈部区域的商用治疗计划系统剂量计算准确性的评估。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2017 Sep-Oct;22(5):420-427. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
4
Assessment of accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by TiGRT treatment planning system in radiotherapy.TiGRT治疗计划系统在放射治疗中对射野外剂量计算准确性的评估。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(3):634-639. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.176423.
5
Evaluation of electron dose calculations accuracy of a treatment planning system in radiotherapy of breast cancer with photon-electron technique.采用光子-电子技术的乳腺癌放射治疗中治疗计划系统电子剂量计算准确性的评估
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Dec;14(Supplement):S1110-S1116. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.199457.
6
AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.在切线束治疗中表面堆积区域的 AAA 和 PBC 计算精度。使用蒙特卡罗代码 PENELOPE 进行的体模和乳房案例研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Oct;93(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
7
Commissioning Varian enhanced dynamic wedge in the PINNACLE treatment planning system using Gafchromic EBT film.在 PINNACLE 治疗计划系统中使用 Gafchromic EBT 胶片对瓦里安增强动态楔形进行委托。
Med Phys. 2009 Oct;36(10):4504-10. doi: 10.1118/1.3223621.
8
Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between treatment planning system and measurement for several breast cancer treatment techniques.评估几种乳腺癌治疗技术的治疗计划系统与测量之间的表面剂量。
Med Phys. 2013 Jan;40(1):011714. doi: 10.1118/1.4770285.
9
Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.网格大小对XiO脑癌治疗计划系统中均匀扫描和调强质子治疗计划的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):447–456. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5510.
10
Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.应用 ArcCHECK 剂量系统进行容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)交付验证的测量比较和蒙特卡罗分析。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 May 6;14(2):3929. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.3929.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Dose Calculation Algorithms Accuracy for ISOgray Treatment Planning System in Motorized Wedged Treatment Fields.电动楔形射野中ISOgray治疗计划系统剂量计算算法准确性的评估
J Med Signals Sens. 2024 Nov 5;14:31. doi: 10.4103/jmss.jmss_28_24. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of the Lung Dose in Three-dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy of Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Phantom Study.左侧乳腺癌三维适形放射治疗中肺剂量的评估:一项模体研究
J Med Signals Sens. 2020 Feb 6;10(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_1_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison between skin dose of breast cancer patients at the breast region, measured by thermoluminescent dosimeter in the presence and absence of bolus.在有和没有 bolus 的情况下,通过热释光剂量计测量乳腺癌患者乳房区域的皮肤剂量之间的比较。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Oct-Dec;14(6):1214-1219. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.188429.
2
Assessment the accuracy of dose calculation in build-up region for two radiotherapy treatment planning systems.评估两种放射治疗计划系统在建成区剂量计算的准确性。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2017 Oct-Dec;13(6):968-973. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.176421.
3
Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between treatment planning system and measurement for several breast cancer treatment techniques.
评估几种乳腺癌治疗技术的治疗计划系统与测量之间的表面剂量。
Med Phys. 2013 Jan;40(1):011714. doi: 10.1118/1.4770285.
4
A study of surface dosimetry for breast cancer radiotherapy treatments using Gafchromic EBT2 film.使用 Gafchromic EBT2 胶片对乳腺癌放射治疗的表面剂量学研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 May 10;13(3):3727. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i3.3727.
5
Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials.保乳手术后放疗对 10 年复发和 15 年乳腺癌死亡的影响:17 项随机试验中 10801 名女性患者个体数据的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-2. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
6
Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.适形放射治疗中乳房表面剂量分布,Eclipse 算法在模体和患者几何条件下的蒙特卡罗评估。
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Jan;102(1):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.06.021. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
7
Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.叠加/卷积算法计算的斜切线光子束剂量学:蒙特卡罗评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010 Nov 3;12(1):3424. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i1.3424.
8
Verification of IMRT dose calculations using AAA and PBC algorithms in dose buildup regions.使用 AAA 和 PBC 算法在剂量堆积区域验证 IMRT 剂量计算。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010 Aug 26;11(4):3351. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3351.
9
AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.在切线束治疗中表面堆积区域的 AAA 和 PBC 计算精度。使用蒙特卡罗代码 PENELOPE 进行的体模和乳房案例研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Oct;93(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
10
Comparison of doses calculated by the Monte Carlo method and measured by LiF TLD in the buildup region for a 60Co photon beam.60Co光子束在积累区内通过蒙特卡罗方法计算的剂量与通过氟化锂热释光剂量计测量的剂量的比较。
Appl Radiat Isot. 2008 Dec;66(12):1925-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.04.021. Epub 2008 May 10.