Sharma Sidharth, Huang Raymond, Hui Shirley, Smith Michael C, Chung Paul J, Schwartzman Alexander, Sugiyama Gainosuke
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2018 Sep;12(3):481-485. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0769-y. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
In recent years, fluorescent cholangiography using Indocyanine green (ICG) dye has been used to aid identification of structures during robotic cholecystectomy. We sought to compare cholecystectomy with ICG dye versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy at an inner-city academic medical center. Between January 2013 and July 2016, we identified 287 patients of which 191 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 96 patients underwent robotic cholecystectomy with ICG dye. Preoperative risk variables of interest included age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), and acute cholecystitis. Primary outcome of interest was conversion to open procedures while secondary outcome was length of stay. The two groups were similar in their BMI (31.98 vs. 31.10 kg/m for the laparoscopic and robotic, respectively, p = 0.32). The laparoscopic group had a greater mean age compared to the robotic group (47.77 vs. 43.61 years, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in sex and emergency surgery between the two groups. Fewer open conversions were found in the robotic than the laparoscopic group [2 (2.1%) vs. 17 (8.9%), p = 0.03]. In multiple logistic regression, robotic cholecystectomy with ICG also showed a lower risk of conversion compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.11-1.65, p = 0.22). ICG fluorescent cholangiography during robotic cholecystectomy may contribute to proper identification of biliary structures and may reduce the rates of open conversion. The preliminary results of fewer open conversions are promising. Further studies with a large randomized prospective controlled study should be taken for further evaluation.
近年来,使用吲哚菁绿(ICG)染料的荧光胆管造影术已被用于在机器人胆囊切除术中辅助识别结构。我们试图在一家市中心学术医疗中心比较使用ICG染料的胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术。在2013年1月至2016年7月期间,我们确定了287例患者,其中191例患者接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术,96例患者接受了使用ICG染料的机器人胆囊切除术。感兴趣的术前风险变量包括年龄、性别、种族、体重指数(BMI)和急性胆囊炎。感兴趣的主要结局是转为开放手术,次要结局是住院时间。两组的BMI相似(腹腔镜组和机器人组分别为31.98 vs. 31.10 kg/m²,p = 0.32)。腹腔镜组的平均年龄高于机器人组(47.77岁 vs. 43.61岁,p = 0.04)。两组在性别和急诊手术方面无显著差异。机器人组的开放手术转换例数少于腹腔镜组[2例(2.1%) vs. 17例(8.9%),p = 0.03]。在多因素逻辑回归中,与腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,使用ICG的机器人胆囊切除术也显示出较低的转换风险,但差异未达到统计学意义(OR 0.42,95%CI 0.11 - 1.65,p = 0.22)。机器人胆囊切除术中的ICG荧光胆管造影术可能有助于正确识别胆管结构,并可能降低开放手术转换率。开放手术转换例数较少的初步结果很有前景。应进行大规模随机前瞻性对照研究以作进一步评估。