Department of Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina; Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL.
Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL.
Surgery. 2021 Apr;169(4):859-867. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.008. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
Bile duct injury and conversion-to-open-surgery rates remain unacceptably high during laparoscopic and robotic cholecystectomy. In a recently published randomized clinical trial, using near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography with indocyanine green intraoperatively markedly enhanced biliary-structure visualization. Our systematic literature review compares bile duct injury and conversion-to-open-surgery rates in patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic cholecystectomy with versus without near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography.
A thorough PubMed search was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized clinical trials with ≥100 patients. Because all near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography studies were published since 2013, only studies without near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography published since 2013 were included for comparison. Incidence estimates, weighted and unweighted for study size, were adjusted for acute versus chronic cholecystitis, and for robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and are reported as events/10,000 patients. All studies were assessed for bias risk and high-risk studies excluded.
In total, 4,990 abstracts were reviewed, identifying 5 near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography studies (3 laparoscopic cholecystectomy/2 robotic cholecystectomy; n = 1,603) and 11 not near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography studies (5 laparoscopic cholecystectomy/4 robotic cholecystectomy/2 both; n = 5,070) for analysis. Overall weighted rates for bile duct injury and conversion were 6 and 16/10,000 in near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography patients versus 25 and 271/10,000 in patients without near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography. Among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bile duct injuries, and conversion rates among near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography versus patients without near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography were 0 and 23/10,000 versus 32 and 255/10,000, respectively. Bile duct injury rates were low with robotic cholecystectomy with and without near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography (12 and 8/10,000), but there was a marked reduction in conversions with near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography (12 vs 322/10,000).
Although large comparative trials remain necessary, preliminary analysis suggests that using near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography with indocyanine green intraoperatively sizably decreases bile duct injury and conversion-to-open-surgery rates relative to cholecystectomy under white light alone.
在腹腔镜和机器人胆囊切除术中,胆管损伤和转为开放式手术的比率仍然高得令人无法接受。在最近发表的一项随机临床试验中,术中使用近红外荧光胆管造影术联合吲哚菁绿可显著增强胆管结构的可视化效果。我们的系统文献综述比较了在接受腹腔镜或机器人胆囊切除术的患者中,使用和不使用近红外荧光胆管造影术的胆管损伤和转为开放式手术的比率。
我们进行了全面的 PubMed 检索,以确定纳入≥100 例患者的随机临床试验和非随机临床试验。由于所有近红外荧光胆管造影术研究均发表于 2013 年之后,因此仅纳入了自 2013 年以来没有近红外荧光胆管造影术的研究进行比较。对纳入研究的大小进行加权和非加权调整,以评估急性和慢性胆囊炎、机器人和腹腔镜胆囊切除术,并以每 10000 例患者中的事件数报告。所有研究均进行了偏倚风险评估,并排除了高风险研究。
共审查了 4990 篇摘要,确定了 5 项近红外荧光胆管造影术研究(3 项腹腔镜胆囊切除术/2 项机器人胆囊切除术;n=1603)和 11 项非近红外荧光胆管造影术研究(5 项腹腔镜胆囊切除术/4 项机器人胆囊切除术/2 项均;n=5070)进行分析。近红外荧光胆管造影术患者的胆管损伤和转为开放式手术的总体加权发生率分别为 6 例和 16 例/10000 例,而未行近红外荧光胆管造影术的患者的发生率分别为 25 例和 271 例/10000 例。在接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中,近红外荧光胆管造影术患者与未行近红外荧光胆管造影术患者的胆管损伤和转为开放式手术的发生率分别为 0 例和 23 例/10000 例,32 例和 255 例/10000 例。机器人胆囊切除术无论是否联合近红外荧光胆管造影术,胆管损伤的发生率均较低(12 例和 8 例/10000 例),但联合近红外荧光胆管造影术可显著降低转为开放式手术的发生率(12 例与 322 例/10000 例)。
尽管仍需要进行大规模的对照试验,但初步分析表明,与单独使用白光相比,术中使用近红外荧光胆管造影术联合吲哚菁绿可显著降低胆管损伤和转为开放式手术的发生率。