Tiberg Irén, Hansson Kristofer, Holmberg Robert, Hallström Inger
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Arts and Cultural Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Nov 28;10(1):630. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2962-5.
Even though the importance of a facilitator during an implementation process is well described, the facilitator's role is rarely problematized in relation to the organizational context in terms of power and legitimacy; themes which have recently been brought to the fore when studying change in health care organizations. Therefore, in this article, we present a qualitative study with the aim of identifying key aspects of the experience of being in a facilitator role. The data collection involved ethnographic fieldwork encompassing observations and field notes, as well as two qualitative interviews with the facilitator. The data were analysed using a phenomenological hermeneutical method in order to formulate thematic aspects of the implementation process. The study was conducted in southern Sweden between January 2013 and August 2014.
One main theme, "walking a tightrope", and four sub-themes, all of which involved balancing acts of different levels and different ways, were identified. These included: being in control, but needing to adjust; pushing for change, but forced to stand back; being accepted, but dependent; and being reasonable, but culturally sensitive.
Instead of listing the desirable qualities and conditions of a facilitator, this study shows that being a facilitator can be described more completely by applying the concept of role, thus allowing a more holistic process of reflection and analysis. This in turn makes it possible to move from the reactive stance of balancing to a more proactive stance of negotiating.
尽管在实施过程中促进者的重要性已得到充分描述,但就权力和合法性而言,促进者的角色在组织背景下很少受到质疑;这些主题在研究医疗保健组织变革时最近已成为焦点。因此,在本文中,我们进行了一项定性研究,旨在确定担任促进者角色的关键体验方面。数据收集包括人种学实地调查,涵盖观察和实地记录,以及对促进者的两次定性访谈。为了阐述实施过程的主题方面,我们使用现象学诠释学方法对数据进行了分析。该研究于2013年1月至2014年8月在瑞典南部进行。
确定了一个主要主题“走钢丝”以及四个子主题,所有这些主题都涉及不同层面和不同方式的平衡行为。这些包括:掌控局面,但需要调整;推动变革,但被迫退后;被接受,但具有依赖性;合理,但具有文化敏感性。
本研究并非列出促进者理想的品质和条件,而是表明通过应用角色概念可以更全面地描述促进者的角色,从而允许进行更全面的反思和分析过程。这反过来又使我们能够从平衡的被动立场转向谈判的更主动立场。