Demarche Sophie F, Schleich Florence N, Henket Monique A, Paulus Virginie A, Van Hees Thierry J, Louis Renaud E
Department of Respiratory Medicine, CHU Liege, GIGA I³ Research Group, University of Liege, Liège, Belgium.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Medicines (CIRM), University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 28;7(11):e018186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018186.
The impact of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on eosinophilic inflammation in asthma is well established, but their effect in a real-life setting has not been extensively studied. Our purpose was to investigate the effect of ICS on airway and systemic inflammation as well as on clinical outcomes in patients with asthma from clinical practice.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on asthmatics from a secondary care centre in whom ICS were initiated/increased (n=101), stopped/decreased (n=60) or remained stable (n=63, used as a control group) between two visits with available sputum and blood cell counts.
The median time between both visits ranged from 1 to 2 years. Initiating or increasing ICS (median variation (IQR): 800 (400-1200) µg beclomethasone equivalent dose per day) reduced sputum eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (P<0.0001) and to a lesser extent blood eosinophils (P<0.0001), while withdrawing or decreasing ICS (median variation (IQR): 900 (500-1200) µg beclomethasone equivalentdose per day) resulted in increased sputum eosinophils (P=0.008). No change was found in patients with a stable dose. The effectiveness of ICS in improving asthma control, quality of life, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV), bronchial hyper-responsiveness and exacerbation rate was only observed in the eosinophilic phenotype (sputum eosinophils ≥3%, n=79). In non-eosinophilic asthmatics, stepping-down ICS resulted in an improvement in asthma control and quality of life, without any significant change in FEV (n=38).
Our results confirm the effectiveness of ICS on eosinophilic inflammation in real life and demonstrate that their clinical benefit seems to be restricted to eosinophilic asthmatics. Our data also support a try for stepping-down ICS in non-eosinophilic asthmatics.
吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)对哮喘嗜酸性粒细胞炎症的影响已得到充分证实,但其在实际临床中的效果尚未得到广泛研究。我们的目的是研究ICS对临床实践中哮喘患者气道和全身炎症以及临床结局的影响。
设计、研究地点和参与者:我们对一家二级护理中心的哮喘患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在两次有可用痰液和血细胞计数的就诊之间,ICS开始/增加(n = 101)、停止/减少(n = 60)或保持稳定(n = 63,用作对照组)。
两次就诊之间的中位时间为1至2年。开始或增加ICS(中位变化(IQR):每天800(400 - 1200)μg倍氯米松等效剂量)可降低痰液嗜酸性粒细胞和呼出一氧化氮分数(P < 0.0001),对血液嗜酸性粒细胞的降低程度较小(P < 0.0001),而停用或减少ICS(中位变化(IQR):每天900(500 - 1200)μg倍氯米松等效剂量)导致痰液嗜酸性粒细胞增加(P = 0.008)。剂量稳定的患者未发现变化。仅在嗜酸性粒细胞表型(痰液嗜酸性粒细胞≥3%,n = 79)中观察到ICS在改善哮喘控制、生活质量、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV)、支气管高反应性和急性加重率方面的有效性。在非嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者中,减少ICS剂量可改善哮喘控制和生活质量,FEV无显著变化(n = 38)。
我们的结果证实了ICS在实际临床中对嗜酸性粒细胞炎症的有效性,并表明其临床益处似乎仅限于嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者。我们的数据还支持对非嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者尝试减少ICS剂量。