Suppr超能文献

视觉美学的计算与实验方法

Computational and Experimental Approaches to Visual Aesthetics.

作者信息

Brachmann Anselm, Redies Christoph

机构信息

Experimental Aesthetics Group, Institute of Anatomy, Jena University Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Front Comput Neurosci. 2017 Nov 14;11:102. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2017.00102. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Aesthetics has been the subject of long-standing debates by philosophers and psychologists alike. In psychology, it is generally agreed that aesthetic experience results from an interaction between perception, cognition, and emotion. By experimental means, this triad has been studied in the field of , which aims to gain a better understanding of how aesthetic experience relates to fundamental principles of human visual perception and brain processes. Recently, researchers in computer vision have also gained interest in the topic, giving rise to the field of . With computing hardware and methodology developing at a high pace, the modeling of perceptually relevant aspect of aesthetic stimuli has a huge potential. In this review, we present an overview of recent developments in computational aesthetics and how they relate to experimental studies. In the first part, we cover topics such as the prediction of ratings, style and artist identification as well as computational methods in art history, such as the detection of influences among artists or forgeries. We also describe currently used computational algorithms, such as classifiers and deep neural networks. In the second part, we summarize results from the field of experimental aesthetics and cover several isolated image properties that are believed to have a effect on the aesthetic appeal of visual stimuli. Their relation to each other and to findings from computational aesthetics are discussed. Moreover, we compare the strategies in the two fields of research and suggest that both fields would greatly profit from a joined research effort. We hope to encourage researchers from both disciplines to work more closely together in order to understand visual aesthetics from an integrated point of view.

摘要

美学一直是哲学家和心理学家长期争论的主题。在心理学领域,人们普遍认为审美体验源于感知、认知和情感之间的相互作用。通过实验手段,这三者在该领域得到了研究,其目的是更好地理解审美体验与人类视觉感知和大脑过程的基本原理之间的关系。最近,计算机视觉领域的研究人员也对这一主题产生了兴趣,从而催生了计算美学领域。随着计算硬件和方法的飞速发展,对审美刺激的感知相关方面进行建模具有巨大潜力。在这篇综述中,我们概述了计算美学的最新进展以及它们与实验研究的关系。在第一部分,我们涵盖了诸如评分预测、风格和艺术家识别等主题,以及艺术史中的计算方法,如艺术家之间影响或赝品的检测。我们还描述了当前使用的计算算法,如分类器和深度神经网络。在第二部分,我们总结了实验美学领域的研究结果,并涵盖了几种被认为对视觉刺激的审美吸引力有影响的孤立图像属性。讨论了它们之间的相互关系以及与计算美学研究结果的关系。此外,我们比较了这两个研究领域的策略,并建议这两个领域将从联合研究中大大受益。我们希望鼓励来自这两个学科的研究人员更紧密地合作,以便从综合的角度理解视觉美学。

相似文献

1
Computational and Experimental Approaches to Visual Aesthetics.
Front Comput Neurosci. 2017 Nov 14;11:102. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2017.00102. eCollection 2017.
3
Computational aesthetics and applications.
Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. 2018 Sep 5;1(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s42492-018-0006-1.
4
Statistical image properties predict aesthetic ratings in abstract paintings created by neural style transfer.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Oct 13;16:999720. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.999720. eCollection 2022.
5
Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct;22(5):904-951. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01004-0. Epub 2022 May 19.
6
And the nominees are: Using design-awards datasets to build computational aesthetic evaluation model.
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 21;15(1):e0227754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227754. eCollection 2020.
7
Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 28;9:218. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00218. eCollection 2015.
9
Neuroaesthetics: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;11(2):265-79. doi: 10.1177/1745691615621274.
10
Fusion of multichannel local and global structural cues for photo aesthetics evaluation.
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2014 Mar;23(3):1419-29. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2014.2303650.

引用本文的文献

1
Aesthetic Judgment in Calligraphic Tracing: The Dominant Role of Dynamic Features.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 14;15(4):525. doi: 10.3390/bs15040525.
2
A toolbox for calculating quantitative image properties in aesthetics research.
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Mar 14;57(4):117. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02632-3.
3
Scaling in branch thickness and the fractal aesthetic of trees.
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Feb 11;4(2):pgaf003. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf003. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
The perceptual primacy of feeling: Affectless visual machines explain a majority of variance in human visually evoked affect.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 28;122(4):e2306025121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2306025121. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
5
How deep is your art: An experimental study on the limits of artistic understanding in a single-task, single-modality neural network.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 6;19(11):e0305943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305943. eCollection 2024.
6
The role of aesthetics in tourist satisfaction in the Ghanaian hospitality industry.
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 13;10(12):e32944. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32944. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
7
Sparsity in an artificial neural network predicts beauty: Towards a model of processing-based aesthetics.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Dec 4;19(12):e1011703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011703. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Predicting the aesthetics of dynamic generative artwork based on statistical image features: A time-dependent model.
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 21;18(9):e0291647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291647. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Using CNN Features to Better Understand What Makes Visual Artworks Special.
Front Psychol. 2017 May 23;8:830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00830. eCollection 2017.
2
High entropy of edge orientations characterizes visual artworks from diverse cultural backgrounds.
Vision Res. 2017 Apr;133:130-144. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Deep Aesthetic Quality Assessment With Semantic Information.
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017 Mar;26(3):1482-1495. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2651399. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
4
Taxonomy of Individual Variations in Aesthetic Responses to Fractal Patterns.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jul 8;10:350. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00350. eCollection 2016.
5
Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits.
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 28;7:973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00973. eCollection 2016.
6
Aesthetic Responses to Exact Fractals Driven by Physical Complexity.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 May 20;10:210. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00210. eCollection 2016.
7
The Role of Visual Eccentricity on Preference for Abstract Symmetry.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0154428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154428. eCollection 2016.
8
Beauty is in the efficient coding of the beholder.
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Mar 2;3(3):160027. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160027. eCollection 2016 Mar.
9
Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 18;10:112. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00112. eCollection 2016.
10
Preference for Curvature: A Historical and Conceptual Framework.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jan 12;9:712. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00712. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验