Mahmoodi Mohammad Reza, Najafipour Hamid, Mohsenpour Mohammad Ali, Amiri Mojgan
Department of Nutrition, Cardiovascular Research Center, Institute of Basic and Clinical Physiology, School of Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Physiology Research Center, Institute of Basic and Clinical Physiology, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
J Res Med Sci. 2017 Oct 31;22:118. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_12_17. eCollection 2017.
We sought the prevalence of food insecurity and whether cardiovascular risk markers and metabolic syndrome components are significantly different in categories of food insecurity in patients with type 2 diabetes.
In this cross-sectional study, 520 patients with type 2 diabetes from the Kerman coronary artery disease risk study aged between 23 and 87 years (60.8 ± 11.4) who selected by one-stage cluster sampling were assigned into four groups of "food secure" and "mild," "moderate," and "severe" food insecure. Household food insecurity was assessed by a 9-item household food insecurity access scale questionnaire.
The prevalence of food security and mild, moderate, and severe food insecurity in patients with diabetes was 24.4%, 33.1%, 28.9%, and 13.6%, respectively. There was a significant difference among the food-secure/insecure sex groups ( = 0.001). The prevalence of food insecurity and risk factors such as total cholesterol, high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and visceral obesity in mild food-insecure females was significantly higher than males ( < 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). The fasting blood sugar significantly increased ( = 0.020) in diabetic females with food security than the other female groups. Diastolic blood pressure significantly increased ( = 0.028) in diabetic females with severe food insecurity than the other female groups. The glycosylated hemoglobin significantly increased ( = 0.013) in diabetic males with severe food insecurity than the other male groups. Food insecurity odds ratio in females was 1.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-2.70), 2.39 (95% CI: 1.48-3.88), and 2.73 (95% CI: 1.49-5.01) times higher than in males for mild, moderate, and severe food insecurity, respectively.
Food insecurity may deteriorate some cardiometabolic biomarkers in type 2 diabetes. Improving food security in patients with diabetes may help reduce cardiovascular disease.
我们旨在探究2型糖尿病患者中粮食不安全的患病率,以及心血管风险标志物和代谢综合征组成成分在不同粮食不安全类别中是否存在显著差异。
在这项横断面研究中,通过单阶段整群抽样从克尔曼冠状动脉疾病风险研究中选取了520例年龄在23至87岁(平均60.8±11.4岁)的2型糖尿病患者,分为“粮食安全”以及“轻度”“中度”和“重度”粮食不安全四组。通过一份包含9个条目的家庭粮食不安全获取量表问卷来评估家庭粮食不安全状况。
糖尿病患者中粮食安全以及轻度、中度和重度粮食不安全的患病率分别为24.4%、33.1%、28.9%和13.6%。粮食安全/不安全的性别组之间存在显著差异(P = 0.001)。轻度粮食不安全女性中粮食不安全及总胆固醇、高低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和内脏肥胖等危险因素的患病率显著高于男性(分别为P < 0.001、0.001和0.001)。粮食安全的糖尿病女性空腹血糖显著升高(P = 0.020),高于其他女性组。重度粮食不安全的糖尿病女性舒张压显著升高(P = 0.028),高于其他女性组。重度粮食不安全的糖尿病男性糖化血红蛋白显著升高(P = 0.013),高于其他男性组。女性轻度、中度和重度粮食不安全的粮食不安全比值比分别比男性高1.74倍(95%置信区间[CI]:1.10 - 2.70)、2.39倍(95% CI:1.48 - 3.88)和2.73倍(95% CI:1.49 - 5.01)。
粮食不安全可能会使2型糖尿病患者的一些心脏代谢生物标志物恶化。改善糖尿病患者的粮食安全状况可能有助于降低心血管疾病风险。