Brizmohun Appayya Mrishta, Sidhu Harbir S, Dikaios Nikolaos, Johnston Edward W, Simmons Lucy Am, Freeman Alex, Kirkham Alexander Ps, Ahmed Hashim U, Punwani Shonit
1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Wolfson House , London , UK.
2 Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital , London , UK.
Br J Radiol. 2018 Feb;91(1083):20170645. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170645. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
To determine whether indeterminate (Likert-score 3/5) peripheral zone (PZ) multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) studies are classifiable by prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), Prostate Imaging Reporting And Data System version 2 (PI-RADS_v2) rescoring and morphological MRI features.
Men with maximum Likert-score 3/5 within their PZ were retrospectively selected from 330 patients who prospectively underwent prostate mpMRI (3 T) without an endorectal coil, followed by 20-zone transperineal template prostate mapping biopsies +/- focal lesion-targeted biopsy. PSAD was calculated using pre-biopsy PSA and MRI-derived volume. Two readers A and B independently assessed included men with both Likert-assessment and PI-RADS_v2. Both readers then classified mpMRI morphological features in consensus. Men were divided into two groups: significant cancer (≥ Gleason 3 + 4) or insignificant cancer (≤ Gleason 3 + 3)/no cancer. Comparisons between groups were made separately for PSA & PSAD using Mann-Whitney test and morphological descriptors with Fisher's exact test. PI-RADS_v2 and Likert-assessment were descriptively compared and percentage inter-reader agreement calculated.
76 males were eligible for PSA & PSAD analyses, 71 for PI-RADS scoring, and 67 for morphological assessment (excluding significant image artefacts). Unlike PSA (p = 0.915), PSAD was statistically different (p = 0.004) between the significant [median: 0.19 ng ml (interquartile range: 0.13-0.29)] and non-significant/no cancer [median: 0.13 ng ml (interquartile range: 0.10-0.17)] groups. Presence of mpMRI morphological features was not significantly different between groups. Subjective Likert-assessment discriminated patients with significant cancer better than PI-RADS_v2. Inter-reader percentage agreement was 83% for subjective Likert-assessment and 56% for PI-RADS_v2.
PSAD may categorize presence of significant cancer in patients with Likert-scored 3/5 PZ mpMRI findings. Advances in knowledge: PSAD may be used in indeterminate PZ mpMRI to guide decisions between biopsy vs monitoring.
确定前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、PSA密度(PSAD)、前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版(PI-RADS_v2)重新评分以及形态学MRI特征能否对不确定(李克特评分为3/5)的外周带(PZ)多参数MRI(mpMRI)检查结果进行分类。
从330例前瞻性接受前列腺mpMRI(3T)检查且未使用直肠内线圈的患者中,回顾性选取PZ内李克特评分最高为3/5的男性,随后进行20区经会阴模板前列腺穿刺活检和/或局灶性病变靶向活检。PSAD使用活检前PSA和MRI得出的体积进行计算。两位阅片者A和B独立评估纳入的同时有李克特评分和PI-RADS_v2评分的男性。然后,两位阅片者共同对mpMRI形态学特征进行分类。将男性分为两组:显著癌(≥ Gleason 3+4)或非显著癌(≤ Gleason 3+3)/无癌。组间比较分别使用Mann-Whitney检验对PSA和PSAD进行分析,使用Fisher精确检验对形态学描述符进行分析。对PI-RADS_v2和李克特评分进行描述性比较,并计算阅片者间的百分比一致性。
76名男性符合PSA和PSAD分析条件,71名符合PI-RADS评分条件,67名符合形态学评估条件(排除明显图像伪影)。与PSA(p = 0.915)不同,PSAD在显著癌组[中位数:0.19 ng/ml(四分位间距:0.13 - 0.29)]和非显著癌/无癌组[中位数:0.13 ng/ml(四分位间距:0.10 - 0.17)]之间存在统计学差异(p = 0.004)。mpMRI形态学特征的存在在两组之间无显著差异。主观李克特评分在区分显著癌患者方面优于PI-RADS_v2。阅片者间主观李克特评分的百分比一致性为83%,PI-RADS_v2为56%。
PSAD可对PZ的李克特评分为3/5的mpMRI检查结果中显著癌的存在进行分类。知识进展:PSAD可用于不确定的PZ mpMRI,以指导活检与监测之间的决策。