• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化前列腺癌积聚模型:将 PI-RADS v2 与前列腺特异性抗原及其衍生数据相结合。

Optimizing prostate cancer accumulating model: combined PI-RADS v2 with prostate specific antigen and its derivative data.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 88 Jie-Fang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Radiology, Yangming Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Yuyao, 315400, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Cancer Imaging. 2019 May 23;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0208-6.

DOI:10.1186/s40644-019-0208-6
PMID:31122297
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6533650/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To establish a new accumulating model to enhance the accuracy of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis by incorporating prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and its derivative data into the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2).

METHODS

A total of 357 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between January 2014 and December 2017 were included in this study. All patients had 3.0 T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and complete laboratory examinations. PI-RADS v2 was used to assess the imaging. PSA, PSA density (PSAD), the free/total PSA ratio (f/t PSA) and the Gleason score (GS) were classified into four-tiered levels, and optimal weights were pursued on these managed levels to build a PCa accumulating model. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated.

RESULTS

In all, 174 patients (48.7%) had benign prostatic hyperplasia, and 183 (51.3%) had PCa, among whom 149 (81.4%, 149/183) had clinically significant PCa. The established model 6 (PI-RADS v2 + level of PSAD + level of f/t PSA+ level of PSA) had a sensitivity and specificity of 81.4 and 84.5%, respectively, at the cut-off point of 11 in PCa diagnosis. Correspondingly, at the 12 cut-off point, the sensitivity and specificity were 87.7 and 83.0%, respectively, in diagnosing clinically significant PCa. The score of the new accumulating system was significantly different among the defined GS groups (p < 0.001). The mean values and 95% confidence intervals for GS 1-4 groups were 10.20 (9.63-10.40), 12.03 (11.19-12.87), 14.12 (13.60-14.64) and 15.44 (15.09-15.79).

CONCLUSIONS

A new PCa accumulating model may be useful in improving the accuracy of the primary diagnosis of PCa and helpful in the clinical decision to perform a biopsy when MRI results are negative.

摘要

背景

通过将前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)及其衍生物数据纳入前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版(PI-RADS v2),建立一种新的累积模型,以提高前列腺癌(PCa)诊断的准确性。

方法

本研究共纳入 2014 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受前列腺活检的 357 例患者。所有患者均行 3.0T 多参数磁共振成像(MRI)和完整的实验室检查。采用 PI-RADS v2 评估影像学表现。将 PSA、PSA 密度(PSAD)、游离/总 PSA 比值(f/t PSA)和 Gleason 评分(GS)分为四级,并在这些管理水平上寻求最佳权重以建立 PCa 累积模型。生成受试者工作特征曲线。

结果

共有 174 例(48.7%)患者为良性前列腺增生,183 例(51.3%)为 PCa,其中 149 例(81.4%,149/183)为临床显著 PCa。建立的模型 6(PI-RADS v2+PSAD 水平+f/t PSA 水平+PSA 水平)在 PCa 诊断的截断点为 11 时,灵敏度和特异性分别为 81.4%和 84.5%。相应地,在 12 个截断点时,诊断临床显著 PCa 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 87.7%和 83.0%。新累积系统的评分在定义的 GS 组之间存在显著差异(p<0.001)。GS 1-4 组的平均值和 95%置信区间分别为 10.20(9.63-10.40)、12.03(11.19-12.87)、14.12(13.60-14.64)和 15.44(15.09-15.79)。

结论

一种新的 PCa 累积模型可能有助于提高 PCa 初步诊断的准确性,并有助于在 MRI 结果阴性时做出进行活检的临床决策。

相似文献

1
Optimizing prostate cancer accumulating model: combined PI-RADS v2 with prostate specific antigen and its derivative data.优化前列腺癌积聚模型:将 PI-RADS v2 与前列腺特异性抗原及其衍生数据相结合。
Cancer Imaging. 2019 May 23;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0208-6.
2
[Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].[前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版诊断评分在3.0T多参数磁共振成像联合前列腺特异性抗原密度用于前列腺癌的初步适用性评估]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 19;97(47):3693-3698. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.47.003.
3
Evaluation of relationships between the final Gleason score, PI-RADS v2 score, ADC value, PSA level, and tumor diameter in patients that underwent radical prostatectomy due to prostate cancer.评估前列腺癌根治术后患者的最终 Gleason 评分、PI-RADS v2 评分、ADC 值、PSA 水平和肿瘤直径之间的关系。
Radiol Med. 2020 Sep;125(9):827-837. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01183-1. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
4
Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版能否减少 PSA 水平在 4-10ng/ml 的男性进行不必要的前列腺活检?
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 May;144(5):987-995. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2616-6. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
5
The Role of PSA Density among PI-RADS v2.1 Categories to Avoid an Unnecessary Transition Zone Biopsy in Patients with PSA 4-20 ng/mL.前列腺特异性抗原密度在PI-RADS v2.1分类中对避免血清前列腺特异性抗原水平为4-20 ng/mL患者进行不必要的移行带活检的作用。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Oct 11;2021:3995789. doi: 10.1155/2021/3995789. eCollection 2021.
6
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
7
Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度相结合可预测初次接受前列腺穿刺活检患者的活检结果。
BJU Int. 2017 Feb;119(2):225-233. doi: 10.1111/bju.13465. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
Using the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RIDS v2) to detect prostate cancer can prevent unnecessary biopsies and invasive treatment.采用前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版(PI-RADS v2)检测前列腺癌可以避免不必要的活检和侵袭性治疗。
Asian J Androl. 2018 Sep-Oct;20(5):459-464. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_19_18.
9
Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?临床信息的加入能否提高 PI-RADS 版本 2 对 MRI 阳性中临床显著前列腺癌的诊断准确性?
Clin Radiol. 2020 Feb;75(2):157.e1-157.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.09.139. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
10
Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone.基于多参数磁共振成像开发一种列线图,用于预测高级别前列腺癌,以减少前列腺特异性抗原灰色区域内不必要的活检。
BMC Med Imaging. 2017 Feb 1;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12880-017-0184-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical, and Biopsy Findings in Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.磁共振成像、临床和活检在疑似前列腺癌中的表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e244258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4258.
2
Prebiopsy bpMRI and hematological parameter-based risk scoring model for predicting outcomes in biopsy-naive men with PSA 4-20 ng/mL.基于活检前 bpMRI 和血液学参数的风险评分模型,预测 PSA 4-20ng/mL 范围内的活检初筛阴性男性的预后。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 19;12(1):21895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26242-7.
3
Combining Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Prostate-Specific Antigen to Differentiate Between Malignant and Benign Prostate Lesions.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of PI-RADS Version 2 in Transition Zone Lesions for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.PI-RADS 版本 2 在检测前列腺癌的移行区病变中的验证。
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):485-491. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018170425. Epub 2018 May 22.
2
Prostate cancer screening in Europe and Asia.欧洲和亚洲的前列腺癌筛查
Asian J Urol. 2017 Apr;4(2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
3
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in the diagnostic algorithm of prostate cancer.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度在前列腺癌诊断算法中的应用。
结合磁共振弥散加权成像与前列腺特异性抗原鉴别前列腺良恶性病变。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Apr 23;28:e935307. doi: 10.12659/MSM.935307.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Apr;21(1):57-63. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0024-7. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
4
Characterizing indeterminate (Likert-score 3/5) peripheral zone prostate lesions with PSA density, PI-RADS scoring and qualitative descriptors on multiparametric MRI.利用前列腺特异性抗原密度、前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分以及多参数磁共振成像上的定性描述符对不确定(李克特评分3/5)的外周带前列腺病变进行特征描述。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Feb;91(1083):20170645. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170645. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
Score 3 prostate lesions: a gray zone for PI-RADS v2.3分前列腺病变:PI-RADS v2的灰色地带。
Turk J Urol. 2017 Sep;43(3):237-240. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.01058. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
6
Gleason Score within Prostate Abnormal Areas Defined by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Did Not Vary According to the PIRADS Score.多参数磁共振成像定义的前列腺异常区域内的Gleason评分并不随前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)评分而变化。
Urol Int. 2017;99(2):156-161. doi: 10.1159/000468947. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
7
Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.基于磁共振成像和前列腺特异性抗原密度的风险分层,可能会减少接受低风险前列腺癌主动监测的男性不必要的后续活检程序。
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):511-519. doi: 10.1111/bju.13836. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.多参数 MRI 和 TRUS 活检在前列腺癌(PROMIS)中的诊断准确性:一项配对验证性研究。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
9
Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical Staging.联合组织学分级与临床分期预测前列腺腺癌的预后
J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2S):S134-S139. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.099. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
10
Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.PI-RADS 版本 2 决策规则的拟议调整:对前列腺癌检测的影响。
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):119-129. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161124. Epub 2016 Oct 26.