• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于逆有限元法的翼形夹层板形状传感与结构健康监测传感器布置策略建模

Modeling of Sensor Placement Strategy for Shape Sensing and Structural Health Monitoring of a Wing-Shaped Sandwich Panel Using Inverse Finite Element Method.

作者信息

Kefal Adnan, Yildiz Mehmet

机构信息

Composite Technologies Center of Excellence, Istanbul Technology Development Zone, Sabanci University-Kordsa Global, Pendik, Istanbul 34906, Turkey.

Integrated Manufacturing Technologies Research and Application Center, Sabanci University, Tuzla, Istanbul 34956, Turkey.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2017 Nov 30;17(12):2775. doi: 10.3390/s17122775.

DOI:10.3390/s17122775
PMID:29189758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5750802/
Abstract

This paper investigated the effect of sensor density and alignment for three-dimensional shape sensing of an airplane-wing-shaped thick panel subjected to three different loading conditions, i.e., bending, torsion, and membrane loads. For shape sensing analysis of the panel, the Inverse Finite Element Method (iFEM) was used together with the Refined Zigzag Theory (RZT), in order to enable accurate predictions for transverse deflection and through-the-thickness variation of interfacial displacements. In this study, the iFEM-RZT algorithm is implemented by utilizing a novel three-node C°-continuous inverse-shell element, known as i3-RZT. The discrete strain data is generated numerically through performing a high-fidelity finite element analysis on the wing-shaped panel. This numerical strain data represents experimental strain readings obtained from surface patched strain gauges or embedded fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors. Three different sensor placement configurations with varying density and alignment of strain data were examined and their corresponding displacement contours were compared with those of reference solutions. The results indicate that a sparse distribution of FBG sensors (uniaxial strain measurements), aligned in only the longitudinal direction, is sufficient for predicting accurate full-field membrane and bending responses (deformed shapes) of the panel, including a true zigzag representation of interfacial displacements. On the other hand, a sparse deployment of strain rosettes (triaxial strain measurements) is essentially enough to produce torsion shapes that are as accurate as those of predicted by a dense sensor placement configuration. Hence, the potential applicability and practical aspects of i3-RZT/iFEM methodology is proven for three-dimensional shape-sensing of future aerospace structures.

摘要

本文研究了传感器密度和排列方式对飞机机翼形状厚板在三种不同载荷条件(即弯曲、扭转和薄膜载荷)下三维形状传感的影响。对于该板的形状传感分析,采用了逆有限元法(iFEM)和精细化之字形理论(RZT),以便能够准确预测横向挠度和界面位移的厚度方向变化。在本研究中,iFEM-RZT算法是通过使用一种新型的三节点C°连续逆壳单元(称为i3-RZT)来实现的。离散应变数据是通过对机翼形板进行高保真有限元分析数值生成的。该数值应变数据代表了从表面贴片应变片或嵌入式光纤布拉格光栅(FBG)传感器获得的实验应变读数。研究了三种不同的传感器布置配置,其应变数据的密度和排列方式各不相同,并将它们相应的位移等值线与参考解的位移等值线进行了比较。结果表明,仅沿纵向排列的稀疏分布的FBG传感器(单轴应变测量)足以预测板的准确全场薄膜和弯曲响应(变形形状),包括界面位移的真实之字形表示。另一方面,应变花的稀疏布置(三轴应变测量)基本上足以产生与密集传感器布置配置预测的扭转形状一样准确的扭转形状。因此,i3-RZT/iFEM方法在未来航空航天结构三维形状传感方面的潜在适用性和实际应用得到了验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/29cb0e0b180d/sensors-17-02775-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/58dab0b62bc3/sensors-17-02775-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/70f71d0f50b8/sensors-17-02775-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/dd7fdbd797c9/sensors-17-02775-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/e28564317a79/sensors-17-02775-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/0e7ad1abe753/sensors-17-02775-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/33c3494dab4e/sensors-17-02775-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/364e2f76ec93/sensors-17-02775-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/06271e8d7060/sensors-17-02775-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/792bfda9045b/sensors-17-02775-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/494d39ffbea5/sensors-17-02775-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/96c6ef1f1cdb/sensors-17-02775-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/18bee3a85823/sensors-17-02775-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/bfb5c34fb598/sensors-17-02775-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/c847543c81c0/sensors-17-02775-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/5b11fde345d9/sensors-17-02775-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/43ab7c84cbca/sensors-17-02775-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/d201bf34d828/sensors-17-02775-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/29cb0e0b180d/sensors-17-02775-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/58dab0b62bc3/sensors-17-02775-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/70f71d0f50b8/sensors-17-02775-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/dd7fdbd797c9/sensors-17-02775-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/e28564317a79/sensors-17-02775-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/0e7ad1abe753/sensors-17-02775-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/33c3494dab4e/sensors-17-02775-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/364e2f76ec93/sensors-17-02775-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/06271e8d7060/sensors-17-02775-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/792bfda9045b/sensors-17-02775-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/494d39ffbea5/sensors-17-02775-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/96c6ef1f1cdb/sensors-17-02775-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/18bee3a85823/sensors-17-02775-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/bfb5c34fb598/sensors-17-02775-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/c847543c81c0/sensors-17-02775-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/5b11fde345d9/sensors-17-02775-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/43ab7c84cbca/sensors-17-02775-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/d201bf34d828/sensors-17-02775-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/5750802/29cb0e0b180d/sensors-17-02775-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling of Sensor Placement Strategy for Shape Sensing and Structural Health Monitoring of a Wing-Shaped Sandwich Panel Using Inverse Finite Element Method.基于逆有限元法的翼形夹层板形状传感与结构健康监测传感器布置策略建模
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Nov 30;17(12):2775. doi: 10.3390/s17122775.
2
Sensor Placement Optimization for Shape Sensing of Plates and Shells Using Genetic Algorithm and Inverse Finite Element Method.基于遗传算法和逆有限元法的板壳形状传感的传感器布置优化。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;22(23):9252. doi: 10.3390/s22239252.
3
Hybrid Shell-Beam Inverse Finite Element Method for the Shape Sensing of Stiffened Thin-Walled Structures: Formulation and Experimental Validation on a Composite Wing-Shaped Panel.加筋薄壁结构形状传感的混合壳梁逆有限元法:复合材料翼型板的公式推导与实验验证。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 27;23(13):5962. doi: 10.3390/s23135962.
4
A Comparative and Review Study on Shape and Stress Sensing of Flat/Curved Shell Geometries Using C-Continuous Family of iFEM Elements.采用 C 连续族 iFEM 元的平面/曲面壳几何形状和应力传感的比较研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 8;20(14):3808. doi: 10.3390/s20143808.
5
Isogeometric iFEM Analysis of Thin Shell Structures.薄壳结构的等几何 iFEM 分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 8;20(9):2685. doi: 10.3390/s20092685.
6
Shape Sensing of Plate Structures Using the Inverse Finite Element Method: Investigation of Efficient Strain-Sensor Patterns.基于逆有限元法的板结构形状传感:高效应变传感器图案研究
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 9;20(24):7049. doi: 10.3390/s20247049.
7
Shape Sensing in Plate Structures through Inverse Finite Element Method Enhanced by Multi-Objective Genetic Optimization of Sensor Placement and Strain Pre-Extrapolation.通过传感器布置的多目标遗传优化和应变预外推增强的逆有限元法实现板结构形状传感
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 18;24(2):0. doi: 10.3390/s24020608.
8
Discontinuous Deformation Monitoring of Smart Aerospace Structures Based on Hybrid Reconstruction Strategy and Fiber Bragg Grating.基于混合重建策略和光纤布拉格光栅的智能航空航天结构的非连续变形监测
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 3;24(11):3603. doi: 10.3390/s24113603.
9
Optimal Sensor Placement Based on Eigenvalues Analysis for Sensing Deformation of Wing Frame Using iFEM.基于特征值分析的 iFEM 在机翼框架变形传感中的最优传感器布置。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jul 25;18(8):2424. doi: 10.3390/s18082424.
10
Application of Inverse Finite Element Method to Shape Sensing of Curved Beams.逆有限元法在曲梁形状传感中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 8;20(24):7012. doi: 10.3390/s20247012.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimisation of Sensor and Sensor Node Positions for Shape Sensing with a Wireless Sensor Network-A Case Study Using the Modal Method and a Physics-Informed Neural Network.利用无线传感器网络进行形状传感的传感器和传感器节点位置优化——以模态方法和物理信息神经网络为例的案例研究
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Sep 6;25(17):5573. doi: 10.3390/s25175573.
2
Monitoring a Railway Bridge with Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing Using Specially Installed Fibers.使用专门安装的光纤通过分布式光纤传感监测铁路桥梁。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 27;25(1):98. doi: 10.3390/s25010098.
3
Discontinuous Deformation Monitoring of Smart Aerospace Structures Based on Hybrid Reconstruction Strategy and Fiber Bragg Grating.

本文引用的文献

1
Damage Detection Based on Static Strain Responses Using FBG in a Wind Turbine Blade.基于光纤光栅的风力涡轮机叶片静态应变响应的损伤检测
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Aug 14;15(8):19992-20005. doi: 10.3390/s150819992.
基于混合重建策略和光纤布拉格光栅的智能航空航天结构的非连续变形监测
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 3;24(11):3603. doi: 10.3390/s24113603.
4
A Critical Comparison of Shape Sensing Algorithms: The Calibration Matrix Method versus iFEM.形状传感算法的关键比较:校准矩阵法与iFEM
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 31;24(11):3562. doi: 10.3390/s24113562.
5
Shape Sensing of Cantilever Column Using Hybrid Frenet-Serret Homogeneous Transformation Matrix Method.基于混合弗伦内-塞雷齐齐次变换矩阵法的悬臂柱形状传感
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Apr 15;24(8):2533. doi: 10.3390/s24082533.
6
Hybrid Shell-Beam Inverse Finite Element Method for the Shape Sensing of Stiffened Thin-Walled Structures: Formulation and Experimental Validation on a Composite Wing-Shaped Panel.加筋薄壁结构形状传感的混合壳梁逆有限元法:复合材料翼型板的公式推导与实验验证。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 27;23(13):5962. doi: 10.3390/s23135962.
7
FOSS-Based Method for Thin-Walled Structure Deformation Perception and Shape Reconstruction.基于FOSS的薄壁结构变形感知与形状重建方法。
Micromachines (Basel). 2023 Mar 31;14(4):794. doi: 10.3390/mi14040794.
8
Towards Automatic Crack Size Estimation with iFEM for Structural Health Monitoring.基于结构健康监测的 iFEM 自动裂纹尺寸估计
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 23;23(7):3406. doi: 10.3390/s23073406.
9
Sensor Placement Optimization for Shape Sensing of Plates and Shells Using Genetic Algorithm and Inverse Finite Element Method.基于遗传算法和逆有限元法的板壳形状传感的传感器布置优化。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;22(23):9252. doi: 10.3390/s22239252.
10
Wing structure and neural encoding jointly determine sensing strategies in insect flight.翅膀结构和神经编码共同决定了昆虫飞行中的传感策略。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Aug 11;17(8):e1009195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009195. eCollection 2021 Aug.