Babbott D, Weaver S O, Baldwin D C
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Mar;149(3):576-80.
Among US medical graduates in 1983, personal characteristics, career plans, and specialty choices of men and women elected to Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA), the honor medical society, differed in a number of ways from those of their non-AOA classmates. Students in AOA scored significantly higher on each subtest of the Medical College Admission Test, were disproportionately white, and had a higher proportion of parents achieving a post-high school education. Members of AOA participated in undergraduate medical research and authored papers during medical school significantly more frequently than those who were not members of AOA, planned a major career commitment to research, and planned careers in academic medicine significantly more frequently than those who did not belong to AOA. In contrast, neither religious preference, among students from Catholic, Jewish, or Protestant backgrounds, nor gender differentiated members of AOA from non-AOA members. Among the 15 specialties studied, internal medicine subspecialties and internal medicine attracted the highest proportion of students elected to AOA.
在1983年的美国医学毕业生中,入选荣誉医学协会——阿尔法欧米伽阿尔法(AOA)的男女学生在个人特质、职业规划和专业选择方面,在许多方面与未入选AOA的同学有所不同。入选AOA的学生在医学院入学考试的每个子测试中得分显著更高,白人比例过高,且父母接受高中后教育的比例更高。与未加入AOA的学生相比,AOA成员在本科阶段参与医学研究并在医学院期间发表论文的频率显著更高,计划将主要职业投入到研究中,并且计划从事学术医学职业的频率也显著高于未加入AOA的学生。相比之下,来自天主教、犹太教或新教背景的学生的宗教偏好以及性别,都没有使AOA成员与非AOA成员区分开来。在所研究的15个专业中,内科亚专业和内科吸引了入选AOA的学生的最高比例。