Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Oct;122(10):1893-1902.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 May 13.
Food insecurity is a critical public health problem in the United States that has been associated with poor diet quality. Cooking dinner more frequently is associated with better diet quality.
This study aimed to examine how food insecurity and dinner cooking frequency are associated with diet quality during the initial months of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
This cross-sectional study analyzed data from a national web-based survey (June 23 to July 1, 2020).
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Participants were 1,739 low-income (<250% of the federal poverty level) adults in the United States.
The outcome was diet quality, measured by the Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS-30D). The PDQS-30D is a food frequency questionnaire-based, 22-component diet quality index.
Food security status (high, marginal, low, or very low) and frequency of cooking dinner (7, 5 to 6, 3 to 4, or 0 to 2 times/week) were evaluated in relation to PDQS-30D scores (possible range = zero to 126) in age- and sex and gender-, and fully adjusted linear regression models. Postestimation margins were used to predict mean PDQS-30D score by food security status and dinner cooking frequency. The interaction between food security status and frequency of cooking dinner was also tested.
Overall, the mean PDQS-30D score was 51.9 ± 11 points (possible range = zero to 126). The prevalence of food insecurity (low/very low) was 43%, 37% of the sample cooked 7 times/week and 15% cooked 0 to 2 times/week. Lower food security and less frequent cooking dinner were both associated with lower diet quality. Very low food security was associated with a 3.2-point lower PDQS-30D score (95% CI -4.6 to -1.8) compared with those with high food security. Cooking dinner 0 to 2 times/week was associated with a 4.4-point lower PDQS-30D score (95% CI -6.0 to -2.8) compared with cooking 7 times/week. The relationship between food insecurity and diet quality did not differ based on cooking dinner frequency.
During the initial months of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic food insecurity and less frequently cooking dinner at home were both associated with lower diet quality among low-income Americans. More research is needed to identify and address barriers to low-income households' ability to access, afford and prepare enough nutritious food for a healthy diet.
在美国,粮食不安全是一个严重的公共卫生问题,与不良饮食质量有关。经常做晚餐与更好的饮食质量有关。
本研究旨在探讨在 2019 年冠状病毒病大流行的最初几个月期间,粮食不安全和晚餐烹饪频率如何与饮食质量相关。
这是一项横断面研究,分析了一项全国性网络调查的数据(2020 年 6 月 23 日至 7 月 1 日)。
参与者/设置:参与者是美国 1739 名低收入(低于联邦贫困线的 250%)成年人。
饮食质量,用 Prime 饮食质量评分(PDQS-30D)来衡量。PDQS-30D 是一种基于食物频率问卷的、由 22 个成分组成的饮食质量指数。
评估了粮食安全状况(高、边缘、低或极低)和每周做晚餐的频率(7、5 至 6、3 至 4 或 0 至 2 次)与 PDQS-30D 评分(可能范围为零至 126)之间的关系,在年龄、性别、性别和完全调整的线性回归模型中。使用后估计边际来预测按粮食安全状况和晚餐烹饪频率划分的平均 PDQS-30D 评分。还测试了粮食安全状况和晚餐烹饪频率之间的交互作用。
总体而言,PDQS-30D 评分的平均值为 51.9±11 分(可能范围为零至 126)。粮食不安全(低/极低)的患病率为 43%,样本中有 37%的人每周做饭 7 次,15%的人每周做饭 0 至 2 次。较低的粮食安全和较少的烹饪晚餐都与较差的饮食质量有关。与粮食安全状况高的人相比,粮食安全状况极低的人 PDQS-30D 评分低 3.2 分(95%CI-4.6 至-1.8)。每周做饭 0 至 2 次与 PDQS-30D 评分低 4.4 分(95%CI-6.0 至-2.8)有关,而每周做饭 7 次。粮食不安全与饮食质量之间的关系并不因烹饪晚餐的频率而异。
在 2019 年冠状病毒病大流行的最初几个月期间,粮食不安全和较少在家做饭都与美国低收入人群饮食质量较差有关。需要进一步研究,以确定和解决低收入家庭获取、负担得起和准备足够营养食品以促进健康饮食的能力方面的障碍。