• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区卫生中心实施以患者为中心的避孕服务模式的障碍与促进因素。

Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers.

作者信息

Politi Mary C, Estlund Amy, Milne Anne, Buckel Christina M, Peipert Jeffrey F, Madden Tessa

机构信息

Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, CB 8100, St Louis, MO 63110 USA.

Divisions of Family Planning and Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 4533 Clayton Ave, Box 8019, St. Louis, USA.

出版信息

Contracept Reprod Med. 2016 Nov 8;1:21. doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0032-3. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s40834-016-0032-3
PMID:29201410
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5693580/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Contraceptive CHOICE Project developed a patient-centered model for contraceptive provision including: (1) structured, evidence-based counseling; (2) staff and health care provider education; and (3) removal of barriers such as cost and multiple appointments to initiate contraception. In preparation for conducting a research study of the CHOICE model in three community health settings, we sought to identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementation.

METHODS

Using a semi-structured interview guide guided by a framework of implementation research, we conducted 31 qualitative interviews with female patients, staff, and health care providers assessing attitudes, beliefs, and barriers to receiving contraception. We also asked about current contraceptive provision and explored organizational practices relevant to implementing the CHOICE model. We used a grounded theory approach to identify major themes.

RESULTS

Many participants felt that current contraceptive provision could be improved by the CHOICE model. Potential facilitators included agreement about the necessity for improved contraceptive knowledge among patients and staff; importance of patient-centered contraceptive counseling; and benefits to same-day insertion of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Potential barriers included misconceptions about contraception held by staff and providers; resistance to new practices; costs associated with LARC; and scheduling challenges required for same-day insertion of LARC.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to staff and provider training, implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision needs to be supplemented by strategies to manage patient and system-level barriers. Community health center staff, providers, and patients support patient-centered contraceptive counseling to improve contraception provision if organizations can address these barriers.

摘要

背景

避孕选择项目开发了一种以患者为中心的避孕服务模式,包括:(1)结构化的、基于证据的咨询;(2)工作人员和医疗服务提供者教育;以及(3)消除诸如费用和多次预约等启动避孕措施的障碍。在准备对三个社区卫生机构的选择模式进行研究时,我们试图确定实施的潜在障碍和促进因素。

方法

我们使用由实施研究框架指导的半结构化访谈指南,对女性患者、工作人员和医疗服务提供者进行了31次定性访谈,评估接受避孕措施的态度、信念和障碍。我们还询问了当前的避孕服务情况,并探讨了与实施选择模式相关的组织实践。我们采用扎根理论方法来确定主要主题。

结果

许多参与者认为,选择模式可以改善当前的避孕服务。潜在的促进因素包括患者和工作人员对提高避孕知识必要性的认同;以患者为中心的避孕咨询的重要性;以及长效可逆避孕法(LARC)当日植入的益处。潜在障碍包括工作人员和提供者对避孕的误解;对新实践的抵触;与LARC相关的费用;以及LARC当日植入所需的日程安排挑战。

结论

除了工作人员和提供者培训外,实施以患者为中心的避孕服务模式还需要通过管理患者和系统层面障碍的策略来加以补充。如果组织能够解决这些障碍,社区卫生中心的工作人员、提供者和患者支持以患者为中心的避孕咨询,以改善避孕服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c16/5693580/10b51f4ba95e/40834_2016_32_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c16/5693580/10b51f4ba95e/40834_2016_32_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c16/5693580/10b51f4ba95e/40834_2016_32_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers.社区卫生中心实施以患者为中心的避孕服务模式的障碍与促进因素。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2016 Nov 8;1:21. doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0032-3. eCollection 2016.
2
Effect of staff training and cost support on provision of long-acting reversible contraception in community health centers.员工培训和成本支持对社区卫生中心提供长效可逆避孕措施的影响。
Contraception. 2019 Apr;99(4):222-227. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
3
Barriers and Pathways to Providing Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Massachusetts Community Health Centers: A Qualitative Exploration.在马萨诸塞州社区健康中心提供长效可逆避孕措施的障碍和途径:定性探索。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Sep;50(3):111-118. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12071. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
4
Providing long-acting reversible contraception services in Seattle school-based health centers: key themes for facilitating implementation.在西雅图的学校健康中心提供长效可逆避孕服务:促进实施的关键主题
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jun;56(6):658-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.016.
5
Patients' experiences with South Carolina's immediate postpartum Long-acting reversible contraception Medicaid policy.南卡罗来纳州立即产后长效可逆避孕医疗补助政策下患者的体验。
Contraception. 2019 Aug;100(2):165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
6
"This has definitely opened the doors": Provider perceptions of patient experiences with telemedicine for contraception in Illinois.这无疑打开了大门:伊利诺伊州提供方对避孕远程医疗患者体验的看法。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Sep;54(3):80-89. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12207. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
7
A Qualitative Study Exploring Contraceptive Practices and Barriers to Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use in a Sample of Adolescents Living in the Southern United States.一项定性研究:探究美国南部青少年样本中的避孕措施及长效可逆避孕法使用的障碍
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018 Dec;31(6):605-609. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
8
Provider perspectives on patient-centered contraceptive counseling for Latinas in Baltimore, MD.马里兰州巴尔的摩市提供者对拉丁裔妇女以患者为中心的避孕咨询的看法。
Contraception. 2023 Mar;119:109921. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.109921. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
9
Provider Perspectives of Barriers to Contraceptive Access and Use among Women with Substance Use Disorders.提供者对患有物质使用障碍的女性获得和使用避孕药具的障碍的看法。
Womens Health Issues. 2022 Mar-Apr;32(2):165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
10
Postabortion contraception: qualitative interviews on counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.流产后避孕:关于咨询和提供长效可逆避孕方法的定性访谈。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Jun;44(2):100-6. doi: 10.1363/4410012. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Ensuring People Living with HIV Inform the Future of HIV Treatment in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for a Community-Led Research Agenda.确保艾滋病毒感染者参与中低收入国家艾滋病毒治疗的未来规划:一项范围综述及社区主导的研究议程建议。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Oct;28(10):3437-3448. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04442-8. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
2
Early removal of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant in Spanish women: a prospective cohort study.西班牙女性中依托孕烯避孕植入剂的早期取出:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 23;11:1172793. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1172793. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016.美国 2016 年避孕方法选择实践推荐
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Jul 29;65(4):1-66. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6504a1.
2
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.2008 - 2011年美国意外怀孕率下降情况
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
3
Addressing Challenges to Implementation of the Contraceptive Coverage Guarantee of the Affordable Care Act.应对《平价医疗法案》避孕覆盖保障实施过程中的挑战。
Exploring Language Used in Posts on r/birthcontrol: Case Study Using Data From Reddit Posts and Natural Language Processing to Advance Contraception Research.
探索 r/birthcontrol 帖子中使用的语言:使用 Reddit 帖子数据和自然语言处理推进避孕研究的案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 30;25:e46342. doi: 10.2196/46342.
4
Equipping providers to offer novel MPTs: Developing counseling messages for the Dual Prevention Pill in clinical studies and beyond.使医疗服务提供者有能力提供新型预防母婴传播干预措施:为临床研究及其他场景中的双重预防药物制定咨询信息。
Front Reprod Health. 2023 May 22;5:1155948. doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1155948. eCollection 2023.
5
How do Specialists Address Contraceptive Care Compared to General Practitioners in a Federally Qualified Health Center in Maryland.在马里兰州的一家联邦合格健康中心,专科医生与全科医生提供的避孕护理有何不同。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231173555. doi: 10.1177/21501319231173555.
6
Pregnancy risks and contraceptive use among postpartum mothers in Cameroon: implications for improving the coverage of postpartum family planning services.喀麦隆产后母亲的妊娠风险和避孕措施使用情况:对提高产后计划生育服务覆盖率的影响。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 2;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01552-1.
7
Factors associated with never-use of long-acting reversible contraception among adult reproductive-aged women in Ohio.俄亥俄州成年育龄期女性从不使用长效可逆避孕措施的相关因素。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Mar;55(1):38-48. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12212. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
8
Providers' approaches to contraceptive provision in Cape Town.开普敦医疗服务提供者提供避孕措施的方法。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Sep 14;3:917881. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.917881. eCollection 2022.
9
Multilevel Influences on Providers' Delivery of Contraceptive Services: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.对提供者提供避孕服务的多层次影响:一项定性主题分析。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 May 9;3(1):491-499. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0128. eCollection 2022.
10
Evaluation of the Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative: A qualitative analysis of site leaders' implementation recommendations.评估特拉华州的避孕途径现在(DelCAN)计划:对现场负责人实施建议的定性分析。
Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):211-215. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
JAMA. 2016 Feb 16;315(7):653-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0204.
4
Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy.提供免费长效避孕措施与青少年怀孕问题
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 2;371(14):1316-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400506.
5
Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women.科罗拉多州的重大变革:长效可逆避孕药的广泛使用以及年轻低收入女性生育率的迅速下降。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;46(3):125-32. doi: 10.1363/46e1714. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
6
Meeting the contraceptive needs of teens and young adults: youth-friendly and long-acting reversible contraceptive services in U.S. family planning facilities.满足青少年和年轻成年人的避孕需求:美国计划生育机构的青少年友好型和长效可逆避孕服务。
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Mar;52(3):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.10.276. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
7
Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives.青少年和青年长效可逆避孕方法:患者及提供者视角
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013 Apr;26(2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
8
Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception.通过提供免费避孕措施来预防意外怀孕。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;120(6):1291-7. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318273eb56.
9
Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.计划生育 CHOICE 项目提供的结构化避孕咨询。
Contraception. 2013 Aug;88(2):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
10
A missed opportunity for care: two-visit IUD insertion protocols inhibit placement.错失的护理机会:两访式宫内节育器放置方案阻碍了节育器的放置。
Contraception. 2012 Dec;86(6):694-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jul 6.