• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How do Specialists Address Contraceptive Care Compared to General Practitioners in a Federally Qualified Health Center in Maryland.在马里兰州的一家联邦合格健康中心,专科医生与全科医生提供的避孕护理有何不同。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231173555. doi: 10.1177/21501319231173555.
2
Effect of staff training and cost support on provision of long-acting reversible contraception in community health centers.员工培训和成本支持对社区卫生中心提供长效可逆避孕措施的影响。
Contraception. 2019 Apr;99(4):222-227. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
3
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共4部分,第1部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
4
Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design.两种避孕护理方案 12 个月后意外妊娠的比较;对照时间趋势设计。
Contraception. 2019 Sep;100(3):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 24.
5
Reproductive care in community health centers: Multi-method evaluation of the Illinois Contraceptive Access Now (ICAN!) demonstration program.社区卫生中心的生殖保健服务:伊利诺伊州“立即获取避孕措施”(ICAN!)示范项目的多方法评估。
Contraception. 2024 Jan;129:110305. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110305. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
6
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共四部分,第二部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
7
Scope of family planning services available in Federally Qualified Health Centers.提供联邦合格健康中心的计划生育服务范围。
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
8
Providing comprehensive contraceptive services in primary care at a rural Federally Qualified Health Center in the USA: adapting to patient need in a culturally conservative, rural environment.在美国农村合格的联邦健康中心的初级保健中提供全面的避孕服务:在文化保守的农村环境中适应患者需求。
Rural Remote Health. 2021 May;21(2):6308. doi: 10.22605/RRH6308. Epub 2021 May 9.
9
Provider and Health System Factors Associated with Usage of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in Adolescents.与青少年长效可逆避孕方法使用相关的医疗服务提供者及卫生系统因素
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017 Dec;30(6):609-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
Quantitative and qualitative impact of One Key Question on primary care providers' contraceptive counseling at routine preventive health visits.“一个关键问题”对基层医疗服务提供者在常规预防性健康检查中进行避孕咨询的定量和定性影响。
Contraception. 2022 May;109:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Primary Care Physicians' Individual- and Community-Level Characteristics With Contraceptive Service Provision to Medicaid Beneficiaries.初级保健医生的个体和社区特征与向医疗补助受益人群提供避孕服务的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Mar 3;4(3):e230106. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0106.
2
Low Rates of Contraception Use in Women With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的女性避孕措施使用率低。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 8;9(5):ofac113. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac113. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Racism Runs Through It: Examining The Sexual And Reproductive Health Experience Of Black Women In The South.种族主义贯穿始终:审视南方黑人女性的性与生殖健康体验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Feb;41(2):195-202. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01422.
4
Women's Coverage, Utilization, Affordability, And Health After The ACA: A Review Of The Literature.《平价医疗法案》实施后女性的医保覆盖、医疗服务利用、可负担性及健康状况:文献综述
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Mar;39(3):387-394. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01361.
5
Women's Preventive Services Initiative's Well-Woman Chart: A Summary of Preventive Health Recommendations for Women.妇女预防服务倡议的《女性健康图表》:女性预防保健建议摘要。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;134(3):465-469. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003368.
6
Improving LARC Access for Urban Adolescents and Young Adults in the Pediatric Primary Care Setting.改善儿科初级保健环境中城市青少年和青年获得长效可逆避孕方法的机会。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2019 Jan;58(1):24-33. doi: 10.1177/0009922818805234. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
7
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers.社区卫生中心实施以患者为中心的避孕服务模式的障碍与促进因素。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2016 Nov 8;1:21. doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0032-3. eCollection 2016.
8
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents: A Review.长效可逆避孕措施在青少年中的应用:综述
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Jul 1;171(7):694-701. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0598.
9
The organization and delivery of family planning services in community health centers.社区卫生中心计划生育服务的组织与提供
Womens Health Issues. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.02.007.
10
Committee opinion no. 615: Access to contraception.委员会意见第 615 号:避孕措施的可及性。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):250-255. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000459866.14114.33.

在马里兰州的一家联邦合格健康中心,专科医生与全科医生提供的避孕护理有何不同。

How do Specialists Address Contraceptive Care Compared to General Practitioners in a Federally Qualified Health Center in Maryland.

机构信息

Chase Brexton Health Care, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231173555. doi: 10.1177/21501319231173555.

DOI:10.1177/21501319231173555
PMID:37158591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10176583/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine associations between primary provider specialty and the contraceptive care that patients receive in a Federally Qualified Health Center setting in Maryland.

METHODS

A study of reproductive-age patients and their providers was performed from January 2018 to December 2021. A pooled crosssectional survey of electronic medical record data for 44 127 encounters of 22 828 patients was performed to calculate the odds of contraceptive care being addressed by patients who had General Practitioner, OB/GYN, pediatrician, or infectious disease (ID) specialists as their primary providers.

RESULTS

In 19 041 encounters (43%), contraception was addressed through either counseling alone, documentation of a contraceptive prescription, or long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) placement procedure. After adjusting for insurance status and race/ethnicity, the odds ratio (OR) of contraceptive care delivery was statistically significantly higher for OB/GYN providers compared to General Practitioners-OR 2.42 (CI 2.29-2.53) and statistically significantly lower for ID providers-OR 0.69 (CI 0.61-0.79). There was a non-statistically significant difference for Pediatricians-OR 0.88 (CI 0.77-1.01).

CONCLUSION

The provision of contraceptive care, a critical aspect of comprehensive primary care delivered in an FQHC setting, varies by provider specialty, and may be negatively influenced by Ryan White funding related structures. There is a need to intentionally design robust referral and tracking systems to ensure contraceptive care is equitably accessible to all, regardless of assigned primary care provider specialty or HIV status.

摘要

目的

在马里兰州的联邦合格健康中心(Federally Qualified Health Center)环境下,确定初级保健提供者的专业与患者接受避孕护理之间的关联。

方法

对育龄患者及其提供者进行了一项研究,研究时间为 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月。对 44127 次就诊中 22828 名患者的电子病历数据进行了汇总横断面调查,以计算由全科医生、妇产科医生、儿科医生或传染病(ID)专家作为主要提供者的患者接受避孕护理的可能性。

结果

在 19041 次就诊中(43%),通过咨询、记录避孕处方或长效可逆避孕(LARC)放置程序来解决避孕问题。在调整保险状况和种族/族裔后,与全科医生相比,妇产科医生提供避孕护理的可能性更高,比值比(OR)为 2.42(95%置信区间[CI]为 2.29-2.53),传染病医生的可能性更低,OR 为 0.69(95%CI 为 0.61-0.79)。儿科医生的差异无统计学意义,OR 为 0.88(95%CI 为 0.77-1.01)。

结论

在 FQHC 环境下提供的避孕护理是综合性初级保健的重要组成部分,其提供情况因提供者的专业而异,可能会受到与 Ryan White 基金相关的结构的负面影响。需要有针对性地设计强大的转介和跟踪系统,以确保无论指定的初级保健提供者的专业或 HIV 状况如何,所有患者都能公平地获得避孕护理。