Ricci Stephanie, Tergas Ana I, Long Roche Kara, Fairbairn Melissa Gerardi, Levinson Kimberly L, Dowdy Sean C, Bristow Robert E, Lopez Micael, Slaughter Katrina, Moore Kathleen, Fader Amanda N
The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017 Nov 15;22:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2017.11.006. eCollection 2017 Nov.
A recent ASCO workforce study projects a significant shortage of oncologists in the U.S. by 2020, especially in rural/underserved (R/US) areas. The current study aim was to determine the patterns of distribution of U.S. gynecologic oncologists (GO) and to identify provider-based attitudes and barriers that may prevent GOs from practicing in R/US regions. U.S. GOs (n = 743) were electronically solicited to participate in an on-line survey regarding geographic distribution and participation in outreach care. A total of 320 GOs (43%) responded; median age range was 35-45 years and 57% were male. Most practiced in an urban setting (72%) at a university hospital (43%). Only 13% of GOs practiced in an area with a population < 50,000. A desire to remain in academics and exposure to senior-level mentorship were the factors most influencing initial practice location. Approximately 50% believed geographic disparities exist in GO workforce distribution that pose access barriers to care; however, 39% "strongly agreed" that cancer patients who live in R/US regions should travel to urban cancer centers to receive care within a center of excellence model. GOs who practice within 50 miles of only 0-5 other GOs were more likely to provide R/US care compared to those practicing within 50 miles of ≥ 10 GOs (p < 0.0001). Most (39%) believed the major barriers to providing cancer care in R/US areas were volume and systems-based. Most also believed the best solution was a hybrid approach, with coordination of local and centralized cancer care services. Among GOs, a self-reported rural-urban disparity exists in the density of gynecologic oncologists. These study findings may help address barriers to providing cancer care in R/US practice environments.
美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)近期的一项劳动力研究预测,到2020年美国肿瘤学家将严重短缺,尤其是在农村/医疗服务不足(R/US)地区。当前这项研究的目的是确定美国妇科肿瘤学家(GO)的分布模式,并找出可能阻碍妇科肿瘤学家在R/US地区执业的基于提供者的态度和障碍。通过电子邮件邀请美国的妇科肿瘤学家(n = 743)参与一项关于地理分布和参与外展护理的在线调查。共有320名妇科肿瘤学家(43%)做出回应;年龄中位数范围为35 - 45岁,57%为男性。大多数人在城市环境(72%)的大学医院(43%)执业。只有13%的妇科肿瘤学家在人口少于5万的地区执业。希望留在学术界以及接受高级别的指导是最影响初始执业地点的因素。约50%的人认为妇科肿瘤学家劳动力分布存在地理差异,这构成了医疗服务获取障碍;然而,39%的人“强烈同意”生活在R/US地区的癌症患者应前往城市癌症中心,在卓越中心模式下接受治疗。与在50英里范围内有≥10名其他妇科肿瘤学家的同行相比,在50英里范围内只有0 - 5名其他妇科肿瘤学家的妇科肿瘤学家更有可能提供R/US地区的医疗服务(p < 0.0001)。大多数人(39%)认为在R/US地区提供癌症护理的主要障碍是工作量和基于系统的问题。大多数人还认为最佳解决方案是一种混合方法,即协调本地和集中的癌症护理服务。在妇科肿瘤学家中,自我报告的城乡妇科肿瘤学家密度存在差异。这些研究结果可能有助于解决在R/US地区执业环境中提供癌症护理的障碍。