• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国妇科肿瘤学临床试验可及性的地理差异。

Geographic Disparities in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trial Availability in the US.

机构信息

Department of Data Science in Mathematics, Herbert W. Boyer School of Natural Sciences, Mathematics, and Computing, Saint Vincent College, Latrobe, Pennsylvania.

Department of Marketing, Analytics and Global Commerce, Saint Vincent College, Latrobe, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2447635. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47635.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47635
PMID:39589740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11600227/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Disparities in minoritized racial and ethnic populations' participation in gynecologic cancer clinical trials are well documented despite the high rates of endometrial cancer in these populations. Geographic proximity to trials is a critical component to ensure equitable trial access.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the geographic distribution of gynecological cancer trials across the US and identify disparities.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of trials first posted on ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2013, through January 10, 2024. This study involved a state-level analysis of clinical trials located in the US. Enrollment criteria of clinical trials for ovarian, uterine, cervical, endometrial, vaginal and/or vulvar, and other gynecological cancers were reviewed to exclude nongynecological cancers (1643 trials) or noninvasive gynecological conditions (224 trials).

EXPOSURE

The number of gynecological trials per 100 000 persons in each state.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A state-level analysis was performed to determine whether gynecologic cancer clinical trial availability in the US is associated with other state-level characteristics to identify areas of increased need. Census data, state-level total population size, percentage of non-Hispanic White persons, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency expected annual loss per state as a measure of social vulnerability were aggregated. The association between these variables and the number of gynecological trials per 100 000 persons was measured using Spearman rank correlation.

RESULTS

Of the 1561 invasive gynecological cancer trials that met the inclusion criteria, most cancer trials were ovarian (911 trials [58.4%]), followed by cervical (438 trials [28.1%]), and endometrial (385 trials [24.7%]). Predominantly minoritized population-serving states (ie, those with <50% non-Hispanic White persons) had fewer than 4 trials per 100 000 persons, but this was not significant nationally (ρ = 0.20; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.45; P = .16). States with higher Federal Emergency Management Agency expected annual loss had lower numbers of gynecological trials per 100 000 persons, which was significant nationally (ρ = -0.53; 95% CI, -0.70 to -0.29; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study of female gynecological cancer trials by state, states with particularly high economic vulnerability and minoritized populations had low clinical trial availability. Further efforts are needed to address disparities identified in this study to ensure equitable trial access.

摘要

重要性

尽管少数族裔人群的子宫内膜癌发病率很高,但这些人群参与妇科癌症临床试验的比例存在差异,这一点已得到充分证明。靠近试验的地理位置是确保公平获得试验机会的关键因素。

目的

描述美国妇科癌症试验的地理分布,并确定差异。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项对 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 1 月 10 日期间首次在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上发布的试验的横断面分析。本研究对美国的临床试验进行了州级分析。对卵巢、子宫、宫颈、子宫内膜、阴道和/或外阴以及其他妇科癌症的临床试验的纳入标准进行了审查,以排除非妇科癌症(1643 项试验)或非侵入性妇科疾病(224 项试验)。

暴露

每个州每 100000 人参加的妇科试验数量。

主要结果和措施

对州一级的分析表明,美国妇科癌症临床试验的可用性与其他州一级特征相关,以确定需要增加的领域。对人口普查数据、州一级总人口规模、非西班牙裔白人比例以及作为社会脆弱性衡量标准的每个州的联邦紧急事务管理局预期年损失进行了汇总。使用 Spearman 秩相关来衡量这些变量与每 100000 人参加的妇科试验数量之间的关系。

结果

在符合纳入标准的 1561 项侵袭性妇科癌症试验中,大多数癌症试验是卵巢癌(911 项[58.4%]),其次是宫颈癌(438 项[28.1%])和子宫内膜癌(385 项[24.7%])。以少数族裔为主要服务对象的州(即,非西班牙裔白人比例<50%的州)每 100000 人不到 4 项试验,但这在全国范围内并不显著(ρ=0.20;95%CI,-0.08 至 0.45;P=0.16)。联邦紧急事务管理局预期年损失较高的州每 100000 人参加的妇科试验数量较低,这在全国范围内具有统计学意义(ρ=-0.53;95%CI,-0.70 至-0.29;P<0.001)。

结论和相关性

在这项按州对女性妇科癌症试验的横断面研究中,经济脆弱性和少数族裔人群特别高的州的临床试验可用性较低。需要进一步努力解决本研究中确定的差异,以确保公平获得试验机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/715b/11600227/1714899932a3/jamanetwopen-e2447635-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/715b/11600227/6808018e72db/jamanetwopen-e2447635-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/715b/11600227/7734a20484f0/jamanetwopen-e2447635-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/715b/11600227/eaaa21ec93de/jamanetwopen-e2447635-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/715b/11600227/1714899932a3/jamanetwopen-e2447635-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/715b/11600227/6808018e72db/jamanetwopen-e2447635-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/715b/11600227/7734a20484f0/jamanetwopen-e2447635-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/715b/11600227/eaaa21ec93de/jamanetwopen-e2447635-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/715b/11600227/1714899932a3/jamanetwopen-e2447635-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Geographic Disparities in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trial Availability in the US.美国妇科肿瘤学临床试验可及性的地理差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2447635. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47635.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
6
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
7
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
8
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
9
A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment.促红细胞生成素α、促红细胞生成素β和达比加群酯治疗癌症相关性贫血(尤其是癌症治疗所致贫血)的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(13):1-202, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11130.
10
Racial and Ethnic Minorities Underrepresented in Pain Management Guidelines for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.在全膝关节置换术疼痛管理指南中代表性不足的少数族裔:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1698-1706. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003026. Epub 2024 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Global determinants of gynecologic cancer incidence and mortality: A cluster-based analysis with predictive insights.妇科癌症发病率和死亡率的全球决定因素:基于聚类的分析及预测性见解。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Sep;171 Suppl 1:147-165. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70279.
2
Global, regional, and national burden of ovarian cancer in women aged 45 + from 1990 to 2021 and projections for 2050: a systematic analysis based on the 2021 global burden of disease study.1990年至2021年45岁及以上女性卵巢癌的全球、区域和国家负担以及2050年预测:基于2021年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug 2;151(8):225. doi: 10.1007/s00432-025-06277-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Clinical Trial Enrollment Among Women With Gynecologic Cancer.妇科癌症女性患者参与临床试验中的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2346494. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46494.
2
Enrollment of Racial and Ethnic Minoritized Groups in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trials: A Review of the Scope of the Problem, Contributing Factors, and Strategies to Improve Inclusion.妇科肿瘤临床试验中少数民族群体的纳入:问题范围、促成因素及改善纳入策略的综述
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar 1;66(1):22-35. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000765. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
3
Cancer statistics, 2023.
癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
4
Race/ethnicity matching boosts enrollment of black participants in clinical trials.种族/民族匹配提高了临床试验中黑人参与者的入组率。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Nov;122:106936. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106936. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
5
A look at the gynecologic oncologist workforce - Are we meeting patient demand?妇科肿瘤学家劳动力队伍考察 - 我们是否满足患者需求?
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Nov;163(2):229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
6
Persistent Disparity: Socioeconomic Deprivation and Cancer Outcomes in Patients Treated in Clinical Trials.持续存在的差距:临床试验治疗患者的社会经济剥夺与癌症结局。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 20;39(12):1339-1348. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02602. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
7
Racial and ethnic disparities over time in the treatment and mortality of women with gynecological malignancies.妇科恶性肿瘤患者治疗和死亡率的种族和民族差异随时间的变化。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Apr;149(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.006.
8
Geographic disparities in the distribution of the U.S. gynecologic oncology workforce: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology study.美国妇科肿瘤学劳动力分布的地理差异:妇科肿瘤学会研究
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017 Nov 15;22:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2017.11.006. eCollection 2017 Nov.
9
Geographic access to gynecologic cancer care in the United States.美国妇科癌症护理的地理可及性。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jul;138(1):115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
10
Strategies addressing barriers to clinical trial enrollment of underrepresented populations: a systematic review.解决代表性不足人群临床试验入组障碍的策略:一项系统综述
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Nov;39(2):169-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 15.