Suppr超能文献

美国及全球癌症生存情况的公共卫生监测:CONCORD项目的贡献。

Public health surveillance of cancer survival in the United States and worldwide: The contribution of the CONCORD programme.

作者信息

Allemani Claudia, Coleman Michel P

机构信息

Cancer Survival Group, Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):4977-4981. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30854.

Abstract

CONCORD is a programme for the global surveillance of cancer survival. In 2015, the second cycle of the program (CONCORD-2) established long-term surveillance of cancer survival worldwide, for the first time, in the largest cancer survival study published to date. CONCORD-2 provided cancer survival trends for 25,676,887 patients diagnosed during the 15-year period between 1995 and 2009 with 1 of 10 common cancers that collectively represented 63% of the global cancer burden in 2009. Herein, the authors summarize the past, describe the present, and outline the future of the CONCORD programme. They discuss the difference between population-based studies and clinical trials, and review the importance of international comparisons of population-based cancer survival. This study will focus on the United States. The authors explain why population-based survival estimates are crucial for driving effective cancer control strategies to reduce the wide and persistent disparities in cancer survival between white and black patients, which are likely to be attributable to differences in access to early diagnosis and optimal treatment. Cancer 2017;123:4977-81. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

摘要

CONCORD是一项全球癌症生存监测计划。2015年,该计划的第二个周期(CONCORD - 2)在有史以来发表的规模最大的癌症生存研究中,首次在全球范围内建立了癌症生存的长期监测。CONCORD - 2提供了1995年至2009年这15年间被诊断患有10种常见癌症之一的25676887名患者的癌症生存趋势,这10种癌症共同构成了2009年全球癌症负担的63%。在此,作者总结了CONCORD计划的过去、描述了其现状并勾勒了其未来。他们讨论了基于人群的研究与临床试验之间的差异,并回顾了基于人群的癌症生存国际比较的重要性。本研究将聚焦于美国。作者解释了为何基于人群的生存估计对于推动有效的癌症控制策略以缩小白人和黑人患者在癌症生存方面广泛且持续存在的差距至关重要,这种差距可能归因于早期诊断和最佳治疗可及性的差异。《癌症》2017年;123:4977 - 81。2017年发表。本文为美国政府作品,在美国属于公共领域。

相似文献

2
Disparities in ovarian cancer survival in the United States (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):5138-5159. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31027.
3
Rectal cancer survival in the United States by race and stage, 2001 to 2009: Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):5037-5058. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30882.
4
Prostate cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):5160-5177. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31026.
5
Lung cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):5079-5099. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31029.
7
Colon cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):5014-5036. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31076.
8
Disparities in breast cancer survival in the United States (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):5100-5118. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30988.
9
Population-based cancer survival in the United States: Data, quality control, and statistical methods.
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):4982-4993. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31025.
10
Stomach cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):4994-5013. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30881.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural compounds-based nanomedicines for cancer treatment: Future directions and challenges.
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2024 Oct;14(10):2845-2916. doi: 10.1007/s13346-024-01649-z. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
2
Colorectal Cancer Survival in German-Danish Border Regions-A Registry-Based Cohort Study.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 8;15(18):4474. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184474.
3
National oncofertility registries around the globe: a pilot survey.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 May 8;14:1148314. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1148314. eCollection 2023.
4
Drug-herb combination therapy in cancer management.
Mol Biol Rep. 2022 Nov;49(11):11009-11024. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07861-9. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
6
Cancer survivorship, excess body fatness and weight-loss intervention-where are we in 2020?
Br J Cancer. 2021 Mar;124(6):1057-1065. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01155-2. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
7
Calpain Small Subunit 1 Protein in the Prognosis of Cancer Survivors and Its Clinicopathological Correlation.
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Nov 26;2019:8053706. doi: 10.1155/2019/8053706. eCollection 2019.
10
Pathological Complete Response by S-1 Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer.
In Vivo. 2018 Sep-Oct;32(5):1211-1216. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11366.

本文引用的文献

1
Population-based cancer survival (2001 to 2009) in the United States: Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):4963-4968. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31028.
2
Do cancer survival statistics for every hospital make sense?
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep;17(9):1192-4. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30391-6. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
3
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: 5 year review.
Lancet. 2016 May 28;387(10034):2164. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30659-6.
4
Global survival patterns: potential for cancer control.
Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):926-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62251-0. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
6
The Affordable Care Act, 1 year later.
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 20;371(21):1960-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1410509.
7
Cancer survival: global surveillance will stimulate health policy and improve equity.
Lancet. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):564-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62225-4. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
8
Colorectal cancer survival in the USA and Europe: a CONCORD high-resolution study.
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 10;3(9):e003055. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003055.
10
Breast cancer survival in the US and Europe: a CONCORD high-resolution study.
Int J Cancer. 2013 Mar 1;132(5):1170-81. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27725. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验