Graduate Prosthodontic resident, Graduate Prosthodontics Program, Restorative Dental Sciences, University of Florida College of Dentistry, Gainesville, Fla.
Professor, Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry, Gainesville, Fla.
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Mar;123(3):434-441. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
The clinical survival of different types of post-and-core systems requires assessment.
The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the clinical survival rate (CSR) of custom-fabricated cast metal and prefabricated (both metal- and fiber-reinforced composite resin post) post-and-cores as a function of patient- and restoration-related variables.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on electronic charts indicating that these patients had received some type of post-and-core between January 2003 and January 2018. A total of 754 records were included in the analysis based on the inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis.
Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated the mean survival time for each group to be 12.0 years for fiber-reinforced composite resin posts, 11.8 years for cast metal post-and-cores, and 10.2 years for prefabricated metal posts. Although the mean survival time differed by 1.8 years among groups, with prefabricated metal posts having a slightly higher risk of failure, this effect was not statistically significant (P=.067). The effect of post type also failed to reach significance when controlling for patient demographics and post position in a Cox proportional hazards analysis (P=.106). However, the Cox model did show that survival was associated with tooth position (P=.003), cement (P=.021), and type of restoration (P<.001).
Analysis showed no evidence that post-and-core survival was significantly associated with 3 types of post-and-cores (custom-fabricated metal, prefabricated metal, and prefabricated fiber-reinforced composite resin). The percentage of root in the bone, tooth position, cement, and type of restoration, however, were significantly associated with survival.
不同类型的桩核系统的临床存活率需要评估。
本回顾性临床研究的目的是评估定制铸造金属和预制(金属和纤维增强复合树脂桩)桩核作为患者和修复相关变量的功能的临床存活率(CSR)。
对电子图表进行了回顾性分析,表明这些患者在 2003 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间接受了某种类型的桩核。根据纳入标准,共有 754 例记录纳入分析。使用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 比例风险分析进行数据分析。
Kaplan-Meier 分析表明,纤维增强复合树脂桩的每组平均存活时间为 12.0 年,铸造金属桩核为 11.8 年,预制金属桩为 10.2 年。尽管各组的平均存活时间相差 1.8 年,预制金属桩的失败风险略高,但这一效果无统计学意义(P=.067)。在 Cox 比例风险分析中,当控制患者人口统计学和桩位置时,桩类型的影响也未达到统计学意义(P=.106)。然而,Cox 模型确实表明,存活率与牙齿位置(P=.003)、水泥(P=.021)和修复类型(P<.001)相关。
分析表明,没有证据表明桩核存活率与 3 种桩核(定制金属、预制金属和预制纤维增强复合树脂)显著相关。然而,根在骨中的百分比、牙齿位置、水泥和修复类型与存活率显著相关。