• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用单对接技术的机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌患者。

Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with the single-docking technique for patients with rectal cancer.

作者信息

Huang Ching-Wen, Tsai Hsiang-Lin, Yeh Yung-Sung, Su Wei-Chih, Huang Ming-Yii, Huang Chun-Ming, Chang Yu-Tang, Wang Jaw-Yuan

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 5;17(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0315-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-017-0315-x
PMID:29208050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5716256/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The robotic system has advantages of high-definition three-dimensional vision and articular instruments with high dexterity, allowing more precise dissection in the deep and narrow pelvic cavity.

METHODS

We enrolled 95 patients with stage I-III rectal cancer (adenocarcinoma) who underwent totally robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) with single-docking technique at a single institution between September 2013 and December 2016.

RESULTS

Of the 95 patients, 48 (50.5%) and 30 (31.6%) patients had lower and middle rectal cancers, respectively. Of the 75 (78.9%) patients undergoing preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), 27 (28.4%) exhibited pathologic complete response (pCR). Only four (4.2%) patients underwent abdominoperineal resection and the sphincter preservation rate was 95.8%. R0 resection was performed in 92 (96.8%) patients. Circumferential resection margin (CRM) and distal resection margin (DRM) were positive in 2 (2.1%) and 1 (1.1%) patients, respectively. The anastomotic leakage rate was 5.4% (5/95 patients). The overall complication rate was 17.9% (17/95 patients); most of them were mild. No 30-day hospital mortality occurred, and no patients required conversion to open surgery. In 92 patients undergoing R0 resection, 2-year overall survival was 94% and 2-year disease-free survival was 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated that totally robotic-assisted TME with the single-docking technique is safe and feasible for patients with rectal cancer, with or without preoperative CCRT. Moreover, favorable pCR rate, R0 resection rate, CRM, DRM, sphincter preservation rate, and short-term oncological outcomes can be achieved by combining this approach with appropriate preoperative CCRT.

摘要

背景

机器人系统具有高清三维视觉和高灵活性的关节器械等优势,能够在深部狭窄的盆腔内进行更精确的解剖。

方法

我们纳入了95例I - III期直肠癌(腺癌)患者,这些患者于2013年9月至2016年12月在单一机构接受了采用单对接技术的全机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术(TME)。

结果

95例患者中,分别有48例(50.5%)和30例(31.6%)患有低位和中位直肠癌。在75例(78.9%)接受术前同步放化疗(CCRT)的患者中,27例(28.4%)出现病理完全缓解(pCR)。仅4例(4.2%)患者接受了腹会阴联合切除术,保肛率为95.8%。92例(96.8%)患者实现了R0切除。环周切缘(CRM)和远切缘(DRM)阳性的患者分别为2例(2.1%)和1例(1.1%)。吻合口漏率为5.4%(95例患者中的5例)。总体并发症发生率为17.9%(95例患者中的17例);大多数并发症为轻度。无30天内医院死亡病例,也无患者需要转为开放手术。在92例接受R0切除的患者中,2年总生存率为94%,2年无病生存率为83%。

结论

结果表明,采用单对接技术的全机器人辅助TME对于直肠癌患者,无论是否接受术前CCRT,都是安全可行的。此外,通过将这种方法与适当的术前CCRT相结合,可以实现良好的pCR率、R0切除率、CRM、DRM、保肛率以及短期肿瘤学结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee5/5716256/f43515a6dbf0/12893_2017_315_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee5/5716256/10063af1d9d1/12893_2017_315_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee5/5716256/fd4a9493bac7/12893_2017_315_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee5/5716256/f43515a6dbf0/12893_2017_315_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee5/5716256/10063af1d9d1/12893_2017_315_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee5/5716256/fd4a9493bac7/12893_2017_315_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ee5/5716256/f43515a6dbf0/12893_2017_315_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with the single-docking technique for patients with rectal cancer.采用单对接技术的机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌患者。
BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 5;17(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0315-x.
2
Long-term outcomes by a transanal approach to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5248-5257. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5597-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
3
Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.经肛门入路机器人辅助吻合术联合或不联合经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:先经肛门入路,再行机器人手术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):154-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1952-4. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
4
Robotic transanal surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasia, transanal total mesorectal excision, and repair of complex fistulae: clinical experience with the first 18 cases at a single institution.机器人经肛门手术用于直肠肿瘤的局部切除、经肛门全直肠系膜切除及复杂肛瘘修复:单机构首例18例临床经验
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Jul;19(7):401-10. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1283-8. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
5
Association of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Total Mesorectal Excision and Margin Status for Rectal Cancer.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术手术入路与结局及切缘状态的相关性。
J Surg Res. 2024 Aug;300:494-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.032. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
6
The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.140例机器人保留括约肌全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局:单中心经验
J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):655-661. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01037-7. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
7
[Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].[162例直肠肿瘤患者机器人经自然腔道标本取出手术分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):384-389. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20191017-00453.
8
[Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].[机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术联合或不联合侧方淋巴结清扫治疗中低位进展期直肠癌的短期疗效:一项倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):370-376. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190725-00289.
9
Robot-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection: Clinical, Pathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes.机器人辅助腹会阴联合切除术:临床、病理及肿瘤学结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Jul;59(7):607-14. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000610.
10
Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.中低位直肠癌的全直肠系膜切除术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3602-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic vs. 3D laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study of short-term outcomes and functional recovery.机器人手术与3D腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:单中心短期疗效及功能恢复的回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2025 Jul 31;12:1630237. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1630237. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer: Real-World Experience over 8 Years of Multiple Institutions with High-Volume Robotic-Assisted Surgery.机器人辅助手术治疗直肠癌患者的临床安全性和有效性:多家高容量机器人辅助手术机构8年的真实世界经验
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 29;14(17):4175. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174175.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic surgery with high dissection and low ligation technique for consecutive patients with rectal cancer following preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy.采用高游离和低结扎技术对术前同步放化疗后的连续性直肠癌患者进行机器人手术。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jun;31(6):1169-77. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2581-y. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
2
Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.中低位直肠癌的全直肠系膜切除术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3602-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602.
3
Clinical and oncologic outcomes of totally robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial results in a center for minimally invasive surgery.
Biomarkers of Favorable vs. Unfavorable Responses in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
局部晚期直肠癌患者接受新辅助同期放化疗的有利和不利反应的生物标志物。
Cells. 2022 May 11;11(10):1611. doi: 10.3390/cells11101611.
4
Critical reappraisal of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced colon cancer.局部进展期结肠癌新辅助同期放化疗的再评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 2;16(11):e0259460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259460. eCollection 2021.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted transabdominal total mesorectal excision and transanal total mesorectal excision: which approach offers optimal short-term outcomes for mid-to-low rectal adenocarcinoma?机器人辅助经腹全直肠系膜切除术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析:哪种方法为中低位直肠腺癌提供最佳的短期疗效?
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Nov;25(11):1183-1198. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02515-7. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
6
Feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer.老年直肠癌患者机器人辅助手术的可行性
J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Apr-Jun;17(2):165-174. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_154_19.
7
Robotics Total Mesorectal Excision Up To the Minute.最新的机器人全直肠系膜切除术
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):552-564. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01109-3. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
8
Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study.既往腹部手术对局部晚期直肠腺癌患者机器人辅助直肠手术的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov 25;18(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-02086-1.
9
Oncological Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Surgery With High Dissection and Selective Ligation Technique for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.采用高位解剖和选择性结扎技术的机器人辅助手术治疗乙状结肠癌和直肠癌的肿瘤学结局
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 21;10:570376. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.570376. eCollection 2020.
10
Time interval between the completion of radiotherapy and robotic-assisted surgery among patients with stage I-III rectal cancer undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy.术前放化疗的 I-III 期直肠癌患者接受放疗和机器人辅助手术之间的时间间隔。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 16;15(10):e0240742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240742. eCollection 2020.
全机器人直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的临床和肿瘤学结果:微创外科中心的初步结果
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Apr;31(4):843-52. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2544-3. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜低位前切除术治疗直肠癌的Meta分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar 1;14:61. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0816-6.
5
Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Update in 2015.直肠癌的机器人手术:2015年最新进展
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;48(2):427-35. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.478. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
6
Totally robotic rectal resection: an experience of the first 100 consecutive cases.全机器人直肠切除术:连续100例的经验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Apr;31(4):869-76. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2503-z. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
7
Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives.直肠癌机器人辅助手术:现状与展望
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 14;22(2):546-56. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.546.
8
Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:单中心短期疗效
Surg Today. 2016 Aug;46(8):957-62. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1266-4. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
9
Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.机器人辅助直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的肿瘤学及临床病理结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jul;58(7):659-67. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000385.
10
Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放直肠癌手术的临床及经济结果比较:三级医疗中心的早期经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1337-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4390-8. Epub 2015 Jul 15.