• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年直肠癌患者机器人辅助手术的可行性

Feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer.

作者信息

Su Wei-Chih, Huang Ching-Wen, Ma Cheng-Jen, Chen Po-Jung, Tsai Hsiang-Lin, Chang Tsung-Kun, Chen Yen-Cheng, Li Ching-Chun, Yeh Yung-Sung, Wang Jaw-Yuan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Apr-Jun;17(2):165-174. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_154_19.

DOI:10.4103/jmas.JMAS_154_19
PMID:33723180
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8083738/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although surgical resection is the main treatment for rectal cancer, the optimal surgical protocol for elderly patients with rectal cancer remains controversial. This study evaluated the feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 156 patients aged 28-93 years diagnosed with Stage I-III rectal cancer, who underwent robot-assisted surgery between May 2013 and December 2018 at a single institution.

RESULTS

In total, 156 patients with rectal cancer, including 126 non-elderly (aged < 70 years) and 30 elderly (aged ≥70 years) patients, who underwent robot-assisted surgery were recruited. Between the patient groups, the post-operative length of hospital stay did not differ statistically significantly (P = 0.084). The incidence of overall post-operative complications was statistically significantly lower in the elderly group (P = 0.002). The disease-free and overall survival did not differ statistically significantly between the two groups (P = 0.719 and 0.390, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer was well tolerated by elderly patients, with similar results to the non-elderly patients. Oncological outcomes and survival did not depend on patient age, suggesting that robot-assisted surgery is a feasible surgical modality for treating operable rectal cancer and leads to age-independent post-operative outcomes in elderly patients.

摘要

背景

尽管手术切除是直肠癌的主要治疗方法,但老年直肠癌患者的最佳手术方案仍存在争议。本研究评估了机器人辅助手术在老年直肠癌患者中的可行性。

患者与方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了156例年龄在28 - 93岁之间、诊断为I - III期直肠癌的患者,这些患者于2013年5月至2018年12月在一家机构接受了机器人辅助手术。

结果

总共招募了156例接受机器人辅助手术的直肠癌患者,其中包括126例非老年患者(年龄<70岁)和30例老年患者(年龄≥70岁)。两组患者术后住院时间在统计学上无显著差异(P = 0.084)。老年组术后总体并发症发生率在统计学上显著更低(P = 0.002)。两组患者的无病生存率和总生存率在统计学上无显著差异(分别为P = 0.719和P = 0.390)。

结论

老年患者对机器人辅助直肠癌手术耐受性良好,结果与非老年患者相似。肿瘤学结局和生存率不取决于患者年龄,这表明机器人辅助手术是治疗可切除直肠癌的一种可行手术方式,并且在老年患者中能带来与年龄无关的术后结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e12/8083738/5a9ab69dc973/JMAS-17-165-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e12/8083738/5a9ab69dc973/JMAS-17-165-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e12/8083738/5a9ab69dc973/JMAS-17-165-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer.老年直肠癌患者机器人辅助手术的可行性
J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Apr-Jun;17(2):165-174. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_154_19.
2
[Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):377-383. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190401-00135.
3
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Sep;16(5):979-989. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_533_18.
4
The oncological and surgical safety of robot-assisted surgery in colorectal cancer: outcomes of a longitudinal prospective cohort study.机器人辅助手术在结直肠癌中的肿瘤学和外科安全性:一项纵向前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3644-3655. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06653-2. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
5
Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.机器人辅助肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的肿瘤学结果和围手术期临床病理结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2625-32. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2895-8. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
6
No beneficial effect on survival but a decrease in postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer undergoing robotic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.机器人手术治疗直肠癌患者的生存获益无影响,但术后并发症减少:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Sep 28;21(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01309-w.
7
Robot-assisted surgery in elderly and very elderly population: our experience in oncologic and general surgery with literature review.老年及高龄人群的机器人辅助手术:我们在肿瘤外科和普通外科的经验及文献综述
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Feb;29(Suppl 1):55-63. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0676-5. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
8
Robot-assisted rectopexy is a safe and feasible option for treatment of rectal prolapse.
Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):A4842.
9
Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of clinical T4b tumours of distal sigmoid and rectum: initial results.机器人辅助腹腔镜下乙状结肠和直肠 T4b 期肿瘤的切除:初步结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4571-4578. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6210-4. Epub 2018 May 16.
10
Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Open Label Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的比较:一项 II 期开放标签前瞻性随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):243-251. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002321.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of first-line cetuximab therapy for older patients (aged ≥ 70 years) with wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a nationwide real-world study.一线西妥昔单抗治疗老年(≥70岁)野生型转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效与安全性:一项全国性真实世界研究
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):3093-3105. doi: 10.62347/QZFD8646. eCollection 2025.
2
Feasibility of robotic surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.老年直肠癌患者机器人手术的可行性:一项荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jan 17;19(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02210-3.
3
Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in geriatric patients with rectal cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review analysis of robotic and transanal approaches in TME surgery- A systematic review of the current literature in regard to challenges in rectal cancer surgery.系统评价分析机器人与经肛门微创手术在全直肠系膜切除术(TME)中的应用- 对直肠癌手术挑战方面的当前文献的系统评价。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;45(4):498-509. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
2
Comparison of efficacy and safety of preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced upper and middle/lower rectal cancer.局部进展期中高位和中低位直肠癌术前放化疗的疗效和安全性比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0987-0.
3
机器人手术在老年直肠癌患者中的安全性和可行性。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Nov 10;28(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03002-5.
4
Robotic laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: A propensity score matching cohort study and meta-analysis.机器人腹腔镜腹会阴联合直肠癌切除术:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究与荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 May 27;16(5):1280-1290. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1280.
5
Robotic Rectal Resection for Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年患者直肠癌的机器人直肠切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 16;12(16):5331. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165331.
6
Robotic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: Review of the current literature.老年结直肠癌患者的机器人手术:当前文献综述
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun 27;15(6):1040-1047. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i6.1040.
7
Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer: Real-World Experience over 8 Years of Multiple Institutions with High-Volume Robotic-Assisted Surgery.机器人辅助手术治疗直肠癌患者的临床安全性和有效性:多家高容量机器人辅助手术机构8年的真实世界经验
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 29;14(17):4175. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174175.
8
Robotic colorectal surgery in elderly patients: A single-centre experience.机器人辅助结直肠手术在老年患者中的应用:单中心经验。
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Oct;18(5):e2431. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2431. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
9
Operative and Survival Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Elderly and Very Elderly Patients: A Study in a Tertiary Hospital in South Korea.韩国一家三级医院的研究:老年和高龄患者结直肠癌机器人辅助手术的手术及生存结果
J Oncol. 2022 Jan 30;2022:7043380. doi: 10.1155/2022/7043380. eCollection 2022.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience.机器人与腹腔镜结直肠手术在老年患者恢复时间方面的比较:一项单中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug;16(4):981-987. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01332-2. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery, mini-laparotomy and conventional laparotomy in patients with Stage I-III colorectal cancer.
I-III期结直肠癌患者接受腹腔镜辅助手术、小切口剖腹术和传统剖腹术的短期和长期结局
J Minim Access Surg. 2018 Oct-Dec;14(4):321-334. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_155_17.
4
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for stage I-III colon cancer: oncologic and long-term survival outcomes.机器人与腹腔镜结直肠切除术治疗 I-III 期结肠癌:肿瘤学和长期生存结局。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2894-2901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5999-6. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
6
Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with the single-docking technique for patients with rectal cancer.采用单对接技术的机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌患者。
BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 5;17(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0315-x.
7
Rectal Cancer in Asian vs. Western Countries: Why the Variation in Incidence?亚洲与西方国家的直肠癌:发病率差异的原因是什么?
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2017 Sep 25;18(10):64. doi: 10.1007/s11864-017-0500-2.
8
Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients.老年患者的结直肠癌手术
Ann Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;33(4):121-122. doi: 10.3393/ac.2017.33.4.121. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
9
Early closure of defunctioning stoma increases complications related to stoma closure after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer.在直肠癌患者中,同期放化疗及低位前切除术后,过早关闭造口会增加与造口关闭相关的并发症。
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr 11;15(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1149-9.
10
Evaluation of the robotic approach concerning pitfalls in rectal surgery.直肠手术陷阱相关机器人手术方法的评估
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;43(7):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 19.