Nishad A, Sreesan N S, Joy Joseph, Lakshmanan Lakshmi, Thomas Joyce, Anjali V A
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Noorul Islam College of Dental Science, Thiruvananthapuram Kerala, India, e-mail:
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics KMCT Dental College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1112-1116. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2185.
The study aimed to assess the impact of mouthwashes on antibacterial activity of individuals with fixed orthodontic appliances.
A total of 60 individuals were considered in the study. Sixty (20 each group) nonextraction class I individuals were randomly divided into experimental and control groups. Group I: Experimental group [chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash], group II: Experimental group (neem mouthwash), group III: Control group (distilled water). All the clinical examinations were done at baseline and 30th day respectively, after the start of orthodontic treatment. The mean differences between the different experimental groups were calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.
There was no statistical significance at baseline mean plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) scores, and Streptococcus mutans (SM) colony count between groups. The PI and GI scores among CHX and neem mouthwash groups (p = 0.002, p = 0.032 respectively) were significantly reduced after intervention and also the SM colonies count was reduced in CHX and neem mouthwash groups and there was significant difference between the groups.
As both mouthwashes showed significant effectiveness on antibacterial activity in individuals with fixed orthodontic appliances, neem mouthwash can be used as an alternative to CHX.
It is better to have a sound knowledge regarding the use of mouthwash in long term as fixed orthodontics are associated with accumulation of SM, enamel demineralization, and an increased number of carious lesions, predominantly in sites adjacent to bracket.
本研究旨在评估漱口水对佩戴固定正畸矫治器个体抗菌活性的影响。
本研究共纳入60名个体。60名(每组20名)不拔牙的I类个体被随机分为实验组和对照组。第一组:实验组[氯己定(CHX)漱口水],第二组:实验组(印楝漱口水),第三组:对照组(蒸馏水)。所有临床检查分别在正畸治疗开始后的基线期和第30天进行。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验计算不同实验组之间的平均差异。
各组间基线时的平均菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)评分和变形链球菌(SM)菌落计数无统计学意义。干预后,CHX漱口水组和印楝漱口水组的PI和GI评分(分别为p = 0.002,p = 0.032)显著降低,CHX漱口水组和印楝漱口水组的SM菌落计数也降低,且组间存在显著差异。
由于两种漱口水对佩戴固定正畸矫治器的个体的抗菌活性均显示出显著效果,印楝漱口水可作为CHX的替代品。
由于固定正畸治疗与SM的积聚、牙釉质脱矿以及龋损数量增加有关,主要发生在托槽附近的部位,因此长期使用漱口水时最好有充分的了解。