Kaya Engin, Ozgok Yasar, Zor Murat, Eken Ayse, Bedir Selahattin, Erdem Onur, Ebiloglu Turgay, Ergin Giray
Department of Urology, Gülhane Askeri Tıp Akademisi (GATA), Ankara, Turkey.
Urology Department, Medical Faculty, Gülhane Military Medical Academy (GMMA), Ankara, Turkey.
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017 Oct;26(7):1095-1099. doi: 10.17219/acem/66837.
The imbalance between oxidant and reductant mechanisms creates a nidus for the etiopathogenesis of several diseases. In this study, we aimed to compare the oxidative stress (OS) parameters in patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer (pCa), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or asymptomatic inflammatory prostatitis (AIP), according to the histopathologic examination of transrectal ultrasonographic prostate biopsy and transurethral prostate resection specimens.
In this study, we aimed to compare oxidative stress between histologically proven prostate cancer, hyperplasia and prostatitis.
According to histopathologic examinations, 97 patients were divided into 3 study groups: group 1: pCa (n = 30), group 2: BPH (n = 41), and group 3: AIP (n = 26). Finally, 30 patients were enrolled in a control group. MDA levels, CuZn-SOD, Se-GPx, CAT activities, and trace element levels were evaluated.
A statistically significant difference between prostate cancer and other groups were documented in terms of MDA activity. Contrary to AIP, a statistically significant difference has also been encountered between BPH and the control group. Decreased CuZn-SOD enzyme levels were found in PCa and BPH patients without statistical significance. Increased CAT activity was also documented in PCa, BPH and AIP patients. No significant difference in GPX activity was documented between the groups, except BPH and control group. Trace element levels were low in the patients with prostate cancer and BPH when compared with the control group.
Despite the data regarding OS in PCa patients, there is a paucity of data regarding BPH and especially AIP patients. Our study revealed obvious oxidative stress in BPH and PCa patients as opposed to AIP. Assessing the oxidative stress in these patients may assist in the future prevention, diagnosis and also treatment. However, the question whether the presence of OS-related parameters and drugs could be used for the diagnosis or management of prostatic diseases, needs to be addressed in future larger and better studies with a more rational basis.
氧化与还原机制之间的失衡为多种疾病的病因发病机制创造了病灶。在本研究中,我们旨在根据经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检和经尿道前列腺切除标本的组织病理学检查,比较诊断为前列腺癌(pCa)、良性前列腺增生(BPH)或无症状性炎症性前列腺炎(AIP)患者的氧化应激(OS)参数。
在本研究中,我们旨在比较经组织学证实的前列腺癌、增生和前列腺炎之间的氧化应激情况。
根据组织病理学检查,将97例患者分为3个研究组:第1组:pCa(n = 30),第2组:BPH(n = 41),第3组:AIP(n = 26)。最后,30例患者纳入对照组。评估丙二醛(MDA)水平、铜锌超氧化物歧化酶(CuZn-SOD)、硒依赖型谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(Se-GPx)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性及微量元素水平。
在MDA活性方面,前列腺癌与其他组之间存在统计学显著差异。与AIP相反,BPH与对照组之间也存在统计学显著差异。在PCa和BPH患者中发现CuZn-SOD酶水平降低,但无统计学意义。在PCa、BPH和AIP患者中也记录到CAT活性增加。除BPH与对照组外,各组间GPX活性无显著差异。与对照组相比,前列腺癌和BPH患者的微量元素水平较低。
尽管有关于PCa患者氧化应激的数据,但关于BPH尤其是AIP患者的数据却很少。我们的研究显示,与AIP相比,BPH和PCa患者存在明显的氧化应激。评估这些患者的氧化应激可能有助于未来的预防、诊断和治疗。然而,与氧化应激相关的参数和药物是否可用于前列腺疾病的诊断或管理这一问题,需要在未来更大型、更合理的更好研究中加以解决。