Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, and School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
School of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 6;12(12):e0188877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188877. eCollection 2017.
Large-scale ungulate migrations result in changes in prey availability for top predators and, as a consequence, can alter predator behavior. Migration may include entire populations of prey species, but often prey populations exhibit partial migration with some individuals remaining resident and others migrating. Interactions of migratory prey and predators have been documented in North America and some other parts of the world, but are poorly studied in South America. We examined the response of pumas (Puma concolor) to seasonal migration of guanacos (Lama guanicoe) in La Payunia Reserve in northern Patagonia Argentina, which is the site of the longest known ungulate migration in South America. More than 15,000 guanacos migrate seasonally in this landscape, and some guanacos also are resident year-round. We hypothesized that pumas would respond to the guanaco migration by consuming more alternative prey rather than migrating with guanacos because of the territoriality of pumas and availability of alternative prey throughout the year at this site. To determine whether pumas moved seasonally with the guanacos, we conducted camera trapping in the summer and winter range of guanacos across both seasons and estimated density of pumas with spatial mark-resight (SMR) models. Also, we analyzed puma scats to assess changes in prey consumption in response to guanaco migration. Density estimates of pumas did not change significantly in the winter and summer range of guanacos when guanacos migrated to and from these areas, indicating that pumas do not follow the migration of guanacos. Pumas also did not consume more alternative native prey or livestock when guanaco availability was lower, but rather fed primarily on guanacos and some alternative prey during all seasons. Alternative prey were most common in the diet during summer when guanacos also were abundant on the summer range. The response of pumas to the migration of guanacos differs from sites in the western North America where entire prey populations migrate and pumas migrate with their prey or switch to more abundant prey when their primary prey migrates.
大型有蹄类动物的迁徙会导致猎物的可获得性发生变化,从而改变捕食者的行为。迁徙可能包括整个猎物物种的种群,但通常猎物种群表现出部分迁徙,一些个体留居,而另一些个体迁徙。在北美洲和世界其他一些地区已经记录到了迁徙性猎物和捕食者之间的相互作用,但在南美洲却研究得很少。我们研究了在阿根廷巴塔哥尼亚北部的拉帕尤尼亚保护区,美洲狮(Puma concolor)对美洲驼季节性迁徙的反应,这是南美洲已知的最长的有蹄类动物迁徙地点。在这个景观中,超过 15000 只美洲驼季节性迁徙,而一些美洲驼全年留居。我们假设,由于美洲狮的领地性和该地区全年都有替代猎物的存在,美洲狮会通过消耗更多的替代猎物来应对美洲驼的迁徙,而不是与美洲驼一起迁徙。为了确定美洲狮是否会随着美洲驼的迁徙而季节性移动,我们在夏季和冬季的美洲驼活动范围内进行了相机陷阱拍摄,并使用空间标志重捕(SMR)模型估算了美洲狮的密度。此外,我们还分析了美洲狮的粪便,以评估其对美洲驼迁徙的反应。当美洲驼从这些地区迁徙到这些地区时,美洲狮在夏季和冬季的美洲驼活动范围内的密度没有显著变化,这表明美洲狮不会跟随美洲驼的迁徙。当美洲驼的可获得性较低时,美洲狮也不会更多地消耗替代的本地猎物或牲畜,而是在所有季节主要以美洲驼和一些替代猎物为食。在夏季,当美洲驼在夏季活动范围内也很丰富时,替代猎物在饮食中最为常见。美洲狮对美洲驼迁徙的反应与北美西部的一些地区不同,在那里,整个猎物种群都在迁徙,而美洲狮则与它们的猎物一起迁徙,或者在它们的主要猎物迁徙时转而食用更丰富的猎物。