Suppr超能文献

欧洲对野生森林产品的新兴趣:生物文化动态的一种表现

New Interest in Wild Forest Products in Europe as an Expression of Biocultural Dynamics.

作者信息

Wiersum K F

机构信息

Forest and Nature Conservation Policy group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2017;45(6):787-794. doi: 10.1007/s10745-017-9949-7. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

Abstract

In Europe, interest in wild forest products is increasing. Such products may be interpreted in a biological sense as deriving from autonomously growing forest species or in a biocultural sense as reflecting dynamics in human living with biodiversity through re-wilding of earlier domesticated species. In this article I elaborate the idea that the new interests reflect biocultural dynamics. First, I identify these dynamics as involving both domestication and re-wilding and characterize these processes as involving biological, environmental, and cultural dimensions. Next, I present a comparative review of two approaches to re-wilding forest production in the Netherlands: meat production from new types of natural grazing systems, and food production from plants re-introduced to the wild. The first approach is based on the stimulation of naturally occurring ecological processes and the second on the stimulation of new forms of experiencing bio-cultural heritage. The examples demonstrate that the new interests in wild forest products involve both a return to earlier stages of domestication in an ecological sense and a new phase of acculturation to evolving socio-cultural conditions.

摘要

在欧洲,人们对野生森林产品的兴趣与日俱增。从生物学意义上讲,此类产品可能源自自主生长的森林物种;从生物文化意义上讲,它们反映了人类通过让早期驯化物种重返野外,与生物多样性共同生存的动态变化。在本文中,我阐述了一种观点,即这种新兴趣反映了生物文化动态变化。首先,我将这些动态变化确定为涉及驯化和重返野外两个方面,并将这些过程的特征描述为涉及生物、环境和文化维度。接下来,我对荷兰两种森林生产重返野外的方法进行了比较综述:利用新型自然放牧系统生产肉类,以及将重新引入野外的植物用于食物生产。第一种方法基于对自然发生的生态过程的刺激,第二种方法基于对体验生物文化遗产新形式的刺激。这些例子表明,对野生森林产品的新兴趣既涉及在生态意义上回归驯化的早期阶段,也涉及适应不断演变的社会文化条件的新文化阶段。

相似文献

1
New Interest in Wild Forest Products in Europe as an Expression of Biocultural Dynamics.
Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2017;45(6):787-794. doi: 10.1007/s10745-017-9949-7. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
2
Ixcatec ethnoecology: plant management and biocultural heritage in Oaxaca, Mexico.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016 Jul 20;12(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13002-016-0101-3.
3
Defining biocultural approaches to conservation.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Mar;30(3):140-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.005. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
4
Network for forest by-products charcoal, resin, tar, potash (COST Action EU-PoTaRCh).
Open Res Eur. 2024 Oct 17;4:176. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18160.2. eCollection 2024.
6
Landscape development, forest fires, and wilderness management.
Science. 1974 Nov 8;186(4163):487-95. doi: 10.1126/science.186.4163.487.
8
Losing a heritage hedgerow landscape. Biocultural diversity conservation in a changing social-ecological Mediterranean system.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Oct 1;637-638:374-384. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.413. Epub 2018 May 9.
9
10
An online spatial database of Australian Indigenous Biocultural Knowledge for contemporary natural and cultural resource management.
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Nov 15;534:110-21. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.073. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Economics of rewilding.
Ambio. 2024 Sep;53(9):1367-1382. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02019-2. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
2
Habitat Characteristics and Mineral Nutrition Status of L. in Latvia.
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;12(3):528. doi: 10.3390/plants12030528.
3
Just beautiful green herbs: use of plants in cultural practices in Bukovina and Roztochya, Western Ukraine.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2021 Mar 4;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13002-021-00439-y.

本文引用的文献

2
Ecological knowledge is lost in wealthier communities and countries.
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Feb 15;42(4):1004-9. doi: 10.1021/es070837v.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验