• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉搜索过程中的简单眼动反馈并无帮助。

Simple eye-movement feedback during visual search is not helpful.

作者信息

Drew Trafton, Williams Lauren H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 S 1530 E Beh S 1003, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0082-3. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-017-0082-3
PMID:29214205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5698384/
Abstract

Searching for targets in the visual world, or visual search, is something we all do every day. We frequently make 'false-negative' errors, wherein we erroneously conclude a target was absent when one was, in fact, present. These sorts of errors can have tremendous costs, as when signs of cancers are missed in diagnostic radiology. Prior research has characterized the cause of many of these errors as being due to failure to completely search the area where targets may be present; indeed, roughly one-third of chest nodules missed in lung cancer screening are never fixated (Drew, Võ, Olwal, Jacobson, Seltzer and Wolfe, Journal of Vision 13:3, 2013). This suggests that observers do not have a good representation of what areas have and have not been searched prior to declaring an area target free. Therefore, in six experiments, we sought to examine the utility of reducing the uncertainty with respect to what areas had been examined via online eye-tracking feedback. We hypothesized that providing information about what areas had or had not been examined would lead to lower rates of false negatives or more efficient search, namely faster response times with no cost on target detection accuracy. Neither of these predictions held true. Over six experiments, online eye-tracking feedback did not yield any reliable performance benefits.

摘要

在视觉世界中寻找目标,即视觉搜索,是我们每天都会做的事情。我们经常会犯“假阴性”错误,即当目标实际上存在时,我们却错误地得出目标不存在的结论。这类错误可能会造成巨大代价,比如在放射诊断中漏诊癌症迹象。先前的研究将许多这类错误的原因归结为未能彻底搜索目标可能存在的区域;事实上,肺癌筛查中漏诊的胸部结节约有三分之一从未被注视过(德鲁、武、奥尔瓦尔、雅各布森、塞尔策和沃尔夫,《视觉杂志》13:3,2013年)。这表明观察者在宣布某个区域没有目标之前,对哪些区域已经被搜索过、哪些区域没有被搜索过并没有清晰的认知。因此,在六个实验中,我们试图通过在线眼动追踪反馈来检验减少关于哪些区域已被检查的不确定性的效用。我们假设,提供关于哪些区域已被检查或未被检查的信息会降低假阴性率或提高搜索效率,即反应时间更快,同时不影响目标检测准确率。但这两个预测都不成立。在六个实验中,在线眼动追踪反馈并未产生任何可靠的性能提升。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48a6/6091468/04ad6e8338ac/41235_2017_82_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48a6/6091468/e0c6fba55d22/41235_2017_82_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48a6/6091468/a4a3ac687203/41235_2017_82_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48a6/6091468/04ad6e8338ac/41235_2017_82_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48a6/6091468/e0c6fba55d22/41235_2017_82_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48a6/6091468/a4a3ac687203/41235_2017_82_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48a6/6091468/04ad6e8338ac/41235_2017_82_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Simple eye-movement feedback during visual search is not helpful.视觉搜索过程中的简单眼动反馈并无帮助。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0082-3. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
2
Eye movement feedback fails to improve visual search performance.眼动反馈无法提高视觉搜索性能。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0083-2. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
3
Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.低患病率效应中的感知失败:来自主动和被动视觉搜索的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):977-94. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000053. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
4
Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph.检测错误还是决策错误?在后前位胸片上漏诊的肺癌
Br J Radiol. 2004 Mar;77(915):231-5. doi: 10.1259/bjr/28883951.
5
How does the perception of a lesion influence visual search strategy in mammogram reading?在乳腺钼靶阅读中,对病变的认知如何影响视觉搜索策略?
Acad Radiol. 2006 Mar;13(3):275-88. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.11.034.
6
Effects of correct and transformed visual feedback on rhythmic visuo-motor tracking: tracking performance and visual search behavior.正确及转换后的视觉反馈对节律性视觉-运动追踪的影响:追踪表现与视觉搜索行为
Hum Mov Sci. 2005 Jun;24(3):379-402. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.007.
7
Focal lung pathology detection in radiology: Is there an effect of experience on visual search behavior?放射学中局灶性肺部病变的检测:经验对视觉搜索行为有影响吗?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Aug;82(6):2837-2850. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02033-y.
8
Blaming the victims of your own mistakes: How visual search accuracy influences evaluation of stimuli.将自己的错误归咎于受害者:视觉搜索准确性如何影响对刺激的评估。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(6):1091-106. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.968097. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
9
Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance and sources of errors: An eye-tracking study.个体差异预测低发生率视觉搜索表现和错误来源:一项眼动追踪研究。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Dec;26(4):646-658. doi: 10.1037/xap0000273. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
10
Redundancy gain in visual search of simulated X-ray images.模拟X射线图像视觉搜索中的冗余增益
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1669-1681. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01934-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of gaze-display feedback on medical students' self-monitoring and learning in radiology.注视-显示反馈对医学生放射医学自我监测和学习的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Nov;29(5):1689-1710. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10322-6. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
2
Errors in visual search: Are they stochastic or deterministic?视觉搜索中的错误:是随机的还是确定的?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Mar 19;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00543-z.
3
Targeted Training Reduces Search Errors but Not Classification Errors for Hepatic Metastasis Detection at Contrast-Enhanced CT.

本文引用的文献

1
Eye movement feedback fails to improve visual search performance.眼动反馈无法提高视觉搜索性能。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0083-2. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
2
You think you know where you looked? You better look again.你以为你知道自己看了哪里?最好再看一遍。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Oct;42(10):1477-81. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000264.
3
You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.你看起来很面熟,但我不在乎:混合视觉与记忆搜索中的诱饵排斥并非基于熟悉度。
靶向训练可减少对比增强 CT 肝转移检测中的搜索错误,但不能减少分类错误。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Feb;31(2):448-456. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.06.017. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
4
Eye tracking reveals expertise-related differences in the time-course of medical image inspection and diagnosis.眼动追踪揭示了医学图像检查和诊断过程中与专业知识相关的时间进程差异。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Sep;7(5):051203. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.5.051203. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
5
A global and local perspective of interruption frequency in a visual search task.视觉搜索任务中中断频率的全局和局部视角。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 16;13:951048. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951048. eCollection 2022.
6
Visual search behavior and performance in luggage screening: effects of time pressure, automation aid, and target expectancy.行李安检中的视觉搜索行为和表现:时间压力、自动化辅助和目标预期的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Feb 25;6(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00280-7.
7
Using aversive conditioning with near-real-time feedback to shape eye movements during naturalistic viewing.使用厌恶性条件反射并结合近乎实时的反馈来塑造自然观看过程中的眼球运动。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):993-1002. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01476-3. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
8
A comparison of visual identification of dental radiographic and nonradiographic images using eye tracking technology.利用眼动追踪技术比较牙片和非牙片放射影像的视觉识别。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Feb;6(1):59-68. doi: 10.1002/cre2.249. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
9
Eye Movements in Medical Image Perception: A Selective Review of Past, Present and Future.医学图像感知中的眼动:对过去、现在和未来的选择性综述。
Vision (Basel). 2019 Jun 20;3(2):32. doi: 10.3390/vision3020032.
10
Using Eye Movements to Understand how Security Screeners Search for Threats in X-Ray Baggage.利用眼动来了解安检人员如何在X光行李图像中搜索威胁物品。
Vision (Basel). 2019 Jun 4;3(2):24. doi: 10.3390/vision3020024.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1576-87. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000096. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
4
Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.低患病率效应中的感知失败:来自主动和被动视觉搜索的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):977-94. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000053. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
5
Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography.计算机辅助检测系统对放射科医生在数字化乳腺摄影中准确性的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Oct;203(4):909-16. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10187.
6
Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too.新培训的机场安检员中的患病率效应:训练有素的观察者也会错过罕见目标。
J Vis. 2013 Dec 2;13(3):33. doi: 10.1167/13.3.33.
7
Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images.扫描仪与钻孔机:通过容积图像表征专家视觉搜索
J Vis. 2013 Aug 6;13(10):3. doi: 10.1167/13.10.3.
8
When and why might a computer-aided detection (CAD) system interfere with visual search? An eye-tracking study.何时以及为何计算机辅助检测 (CAD) 系统会干扰视觉搜索?一项眼动研究。
Acad Radiol. 2012 Oct;19(10):1260-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.05.013.
9
A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations.一种用于相关和偏相关的默认贝叶斯假设检验。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1057-64. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0295-x.
10
What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search?视觉搜索中反应时分布的形状有哪些?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):58-71. doi: 10.1037/a0020747.