Joseph Henry Laboratories of Physics, and Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, 08544, Princeton NJ, United States of America. Initiative for the Theoretical Sciences, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 Fifth Ave, 10016, New York NY, United States of America.
Rep Prog Phys. 2018 Jan;81(1):012601. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aa995b.
Theoretical physics is the search for simple and universal mathematical descriptions of the natural world. In contrast, much of modern biology is an exploration of the complexity and diversity of life. For many, this contrast is prima facie evidence that theory, in the sense that physicists use the word, is impossible in a biological context. For others, this contrast serves to highlight a grand challenge. I am an optimist, and believe (along with many colleagues) that the time is ripe for the emergence of a more unified theoretical physics of biological systems, building on successes in thinking about particular phenomena. In this essay I try to explain the reasons for my optimism, through a combination of historical and modern examples.
理论物理学是对自然世界进行简单而普遍的数学描述的探索。相比之下,现代生物学的很大一部分是对生命的复杂性和多样性的探索。对许多人来说,这种对比是理论物理学家使用的理论在生物学背景下是不可能的明显证据。对另一些人来说,这种对比则突显了一个重大挑战。我是一个乐观主义者,并且(与许多同事一样)相信,在对特定现象进行思考方面取得成功的基础上,出现更统一的生物系统理论物理学的时机已经成熟。在这篇文章中,我试图通过历史和现代的例子相结合来解释我乐观的原因。