Krannert School of Management, Purdue University.
Department of Applied Behavioral Sciences, University of Baltimore.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):36-54. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000104. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
Although job stress models suggest that changing the work social environment to increase job resources improves psychological health, many intervention studies have weak designs and overlook influences of family caregiving demands. We tested the effects of an organizational intervention designed to increase supervisor social support for work and nonwork roles, and job control in a results-oriented work environment on the stress and psychological distress of health care employees who care for the elderly, while simultaneously considering their own family caregiving responsibilities. Using a group-randomized organizational field trial with an intent-to-treat design, 420 caregivers in 15 intervention extended-care nursing facilities were compared with 511 caregivers in 15 control facilities at 4 measurement times: preintervention and 6, 12, and 18 months. There were no main intervention effects showing improvements in stress and psychological distress when comparing intervention with control sites. Moderation analyses indicate that the intervention was more effective in reducing stress and psychological distress for caregivers who were also caring for other family members off the job (those with elders and those "sandwiched" with both child and elder caregiving responsibilities) compared with employees without caregiving demands. These findings extend previous studies by showing that the effect of organizational interventions designed to increase job resources to improve psychological health varies according to differences in nonwork caregiving demands. This research suggests that caregivers, especially those with "double-duty" elder caregiving at home and work and "triple-duty" responsibilities, including child care, may benefit from interventions designed to increase work-nonwork social support and job control. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
虽然工作压力模型表明,改变工作的社会环境以增加工作资源可以改善心理健康,但许多干预研究的设计薄弱,忽视了家庭护理需求的影响。我们测试了一种组织干预措施的效果,该措施旨在增加主管对工作和非工作角色的社会支持,以及在以结果为导向的工作环境中提高工作控制,以应对照顾老年人的医疗保健员工的压力和心理困扰,同时考虑到他们自己的家庭护理责任。使用意向治疗设计的群组随机组织现场试验,将 15 个干预延长护理设施中的 420 名护理人员与 15 个对照设施中的 511 名护理人员在 4 次测量时间进行比较:干预前和 6、12 和 18 个月。当将干预组与对照组进行比较时,没有显示出干预对压力和心理困扰有改善的主要干预效果。调节分析表明,对于那些除了工作外还照顾其他家庭成员的护理人员(那些照顾老人的人员和同时照顾儿童和老人的“夹心”护理人员),干预措施在减轻压力和心理困扰方面更为有效,而对于没有护理需求的员工则没有这种效果。这些发现通过表明旨在增加工作资源以改善心理健康的组织干预措施的效果因非工作护理需求的差异而有所不同,从而扩展了先前的研究。这表明,特别是那些在家和工作中承担“双重责任”的老年护理以及包括儿童保育在内的“三重责任”的护理人员,可能会受益于旨在增加工作-非工作社会支持和工作控制的干预措施。(美国心理协会,2019 年,所有权利保留)。