1 Mental Health Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
2 Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, International Excellence Campus, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;63(8):538-546. doi: 10.1177/0706743717746661. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
This study had 2 objectives: First, to explore the gender-related differences in emotional processing (EP) and theory of mind-both cognitive (CToM) and affective (AToM)-in patients with schizophrenia and in a control group of healthy subjects; and, second, to examine, from a gender perspective, the possible association between EP and CToM in the AToM performance.
Forty patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder were recruited and matched by gender, age and years of education with 40 healthy subjects. EP was measured by the pictures of facial affect (POFA) test. CToM was measured using first- and second-order false-belief (FB) stories. AToM was measured by the reading the mind in the eyes test (RMET). Group and gender differences in CToM were analysed using the X test, whereas EP and AToM were analysed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U Test and a general linear model. Results were adjusted by intelligence quotient and negative symptomatology.
Patients with schizophrenia underperformed against healthy subjects in the POFA test, second-order FB, and RMET, but not in first-order FB. No significant gender differences were found. However, there was a trend showing that females outperformed males in the POFA ( P = 0.056). Group ( P < 0.001), POFA ( P < 0.001) and second-order FB ( P = 0.022) were the best factors predicting RMET performance (adjusted R = 0.584).
Our results suggest that the illness is the main factor related to the deficit in social cognition, except for the basic aspects of the CToM that were unimpaired in most patients. Nevertheless, the influence of female gender in EP should not be neglected in any group. Finally, the hierarchal interaction between these domains is discussed.
本研究有两个目的:首先,探索精神分裂症患者和健康对照组中情感加工(EP)和心理理论(ToM)-包括认知(CToM)和情感(AToM)-的性别差异;其次,从性别角度探讨 EP 与 AToM 表现中的 CToM 之间的可能关联。
招募了 40 名精神分裂症/分裂情感障碍患者,并按性别、年龄和受教育年限与 40 名健康受试者相匹配。通过面部表情图片测试(POFA)测试测量 EP。使用第一和第二级错误信念(FB)故事测量 CToM。通过阅读眼睛中的思想测试(RMET)测量 AToM。使用 X 检验分析 CToM 的组间和性别差异,而 EP 和 AToM 则使用非参数曼-惠特尼 U 检验和一般线性模型进行分析。结果通过智商和阴性症状进行调整。
精神分裂症患者在 POFA 测试、第二级 FB 和 RMET 测试中表现不如健康对照组,但在第一级 FB 测试中没有差异。未发现显著的性别差异。然而,有一个趋势表明女性在 POFA 中表现优于男性(P=0.056)。组间(P<0.001)、POFA(P<0.001)和第二级 FB(P=0.022)是预测 RMET 表现的最佳因素(调整后的 R=0.584)。
我们的结果表明,除了大多数患者的 CToM 基本方面不受影响外,疾病是与社会认知缺陷相关的主要因素。然而,在任何组中都不应忽视女性在 EP 中的影响。最后,讨论了这些领域之间的层次交互作用。