a Department of Life and Sport Sciences, University of Greenwich, Medway, Kent ME4 4TB, UK.
b Lunex International University of Health, Exercise and Sports, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, 4671 Differdange, Luxembourg.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018 May;43(5):475-481. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0575. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
The present study compared the effects of 2 weekly-equalized volume and relative load interventions on body composition, strength, and power. Based on individual baseline maximal strength values, 18 recreationally trained men were pair-matched and consequently randomly assigned to one of the following experimental groups: a low volume per session with a high frequency (LV-HF, n = 9) group who trained for 4 days (Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays) or a high volume per session and low frequency (HV-LF, n = 9) group who trained for 2 days (Mondays and Thursdays). Both groups performed 2 different routines over 6 weeks. Participants were tested pre- and post- intervention for maximal strength, upper body power, fat-free mass, limb circumferences, and muscle thickness. Compared with baseline values, both groups increased their fat-free mass (HV-LF: +1.19 ± 1.94; LV-HF: +1.36 ± 1.06 kg, p < 0.05) and vastus medialis thickness (HV-LF: +2.18 ± 1.88, p < 0.01; LV-HF: +1.82 ± 2.43 mm, p < 0.05), but only the HV-LF group enhanced arm circumference (1.08 ± 1.47 cm, p < 0.05) and elbow flexors thickness (2.21 ± 2.81 mm, P < 0.01) values and decreased their fat mass (-2.41 ± 1.10, P < 0.01). Both groups improved (p < 0.01) the maximal loads lifted in the bench press (LV-HF: +0.14 ± 0.01; HV-LF: +0.14 ± 0.01 kg·body mass) and the squat (LV-HF: +0.14 ± 0.06; HV-LF: 0.17 ± 0.01 kg·body mass) exercises as well as in upper body power (LV-HF: +0.22 ± 0.25; HV-LF: +0.27 ± 0.22 W·body mass) Although both training strategies improved performance and lower body muscle mass, only the HV-LF protocol increased upper body hypertrophy and improved body composition.
本研究比较了两种每周均衡体积和相对负荷干预对身体成分、力量和功率的影响。根据个体基线最大力量值,18 名有经验的男性进行配对,然后随机分配到以下实验分组之一:低容量、高频率(LV-HF,n = 9)组,每周训练 4 天(周一、周二、周四和周五);或高容量、低频率(HV-LF,n = 9)组,每周训练 2 天(周一和周四)。两组均在 6 周内进行 2 种不同的训练。在干预前后,参与者接受最大力量、上肢力量、去脂体重、肢体围度和肌肉厚度测试。与基线值相比,两组均增加了去脂体重(HV-LF:+1.19 ± 1.94 kg;LV-HF:+1.36 ± 1.06 kg,p < 0.05)和股四头肌内侧厚度(HV-LF:+2.18 ± 1.88,p < 0.01;LV-HF:+1.82 ± 2.43 mm,p < 0.05),但只有 HV-LF 组增加了臂围(1.08 ± 1.47 cm,p < 0.05)和肘屈肌厚度(2.21 ± 2.81 mm,P < 0.01)值,降低了脂肪量(-2.41 ± 1.10,P < 0.01)。两组均改善(p < 0.01)卧推(LV-HF:+0.14 ± 0.01;HV-LF:+0.14 ± 0.01 kg·体重)和深蹲(LV-HF:+0.14 ± 0.06;HV-LF:0.17 ± 0.01 kg·体重)运动的最大负荷,以及上肢力量(LV-HF:+0.22 ± 0.25;HV-LF:+0.27 ± 0.22 W·体重)。尽管两种训练策略都提高了运动表现和下肢肌肉量,但只有 HV-LF 方案增加了上肢肥大并改善了身体成分。