• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 2 种每周等容量阻力训练方案,在训练有素的男性中使用不同频率对身体成分和性能的影响。

Comparison of 2 weekly-equalized volume resistance-training routines using different frequencies on body composition and performance in trained males.

机构信息

a Department of Life and Sport Sciences, University of Greenwich, Medway, Kent ME4 4TB, UK.

b Lunex International University of Health, Exercise and Sports, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, 4671 Differdange, Luxembourg.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018 May;43(5):475-481. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0575. Epub 2017 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1139/apnm-2017-0575
PMID:29216446
Abstract

The present study compared the effects of 2 weekly-equalized volume and relative load interventions on body composition, strength, and power. Based on individual baseline maximal strength values, 18 recreationally trained men were pair-matched and consequently randomly assigned to one of the following experimental groups: a low volume per session with a high frequency (LV-HF, n = 9) group who trained for 4 days (Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays) or a high volume per session and low frequency (HV-LF, n = 9) group who trained for 2 days (Mondays and Thursdays). Both groups performed 2 different routines over 6 weeks. Participants were tested pre- and post- intervention for maximal strength, upper body power, fat-free mass, limb circumferences, and muscle thickness. Compared with baseline values, both groups increased their fat-free mass (HV-LF: +1.19 ± 1.94; LV-HF: +1.36 ± 1.06 kg, p < 0.05) and vastus medialis thickness (HV-LF: +2.18 ± 1.88, p < 0.01; LV-HF: +1.82 ± 2.43 mm, p < 0.05), but only the HV-LF group enhanced arm circumference (1.08 ± 1.47 cm, p < 0.05) and elbow flexors thickness (2.21 ± 2.81 mm, P < 0.01) values and decreased their fat mass (-2.41 ± 1.10, P < 0.01). Both groups improved (p < 0.01) the maximal loads lifted in the bench press (LV-HF: +0.14 ± 0.01; HV-LF: +0.14 ± 0.01 kg·body mass) and the squat (LV-HF: +0.14 ± 0.06; HV-LF: 0.17 ± 0.01 kg·body mass) exercises as well as in upper body power (LV-HF: +0.22 ± 0.25; HV-LF: +0.27 ± 0.22 W·body mass) Although both training strategies improved performance and lower body muscle mass, only the HV-LF protocol increased upper body hypertrophy and improved body composition.

摘要

本研究比较了两种每周均衡体积和相对负荷干预对身体成分、力量和功率的影响。根据个体基线最大力量值,18 名有经验的男性进行配对,然后随机分配到以下实验分组之一:低容量、高频率(LV-HF,n = 9)组,每周训练 4 天(周一、周二、周四和周五);或高容量、低频率(HV-LF,n = 9)组,每周训练 2 天(周一和周四)。两组均在 6 周内进行 2 种不同的训练。在干预前后,参与者接受最大力量、上肢力量、去脂体重、肢体围度和肌肉厚度测试。与基线值相比,两组均增加了去脂体重(HV-LF:+1.19 ± 1.94 kg;LV-HF:+1.36 ± 1.06 kg,p < 0.05)和股四头肌内侧厚度(HV-LF:+2.18 ± 1.88,p < 0.01;LV-HF:+1.82 ± 2.43 mm,p < 0.05),但只有 HV-LF 组增加了臂围(1.08 ± 1.47 cm,p < 0.05)和肘屈肌厚度(2.21 ± 2.81 mm,P < 0.01)值,降低了脂肪量(-2.41 ± 1.10,P < 0.01)。两组均改善(p < 0.01)卧推(LV-HF:+0.14 ± 0.01;HV-LF:+0.14 ± 0.01 kg·体重)和深蹲(LV-HF:+0.14 ± 0.06;HV-LF:0.17 ± 0.01 kg·体重)运动的最大负荷,以及上肢力量(LV-HF:+0.22 ± 0.25;HV-LF:+0.27 ± 0.22 W·体重)。尽管两种训练策略都提高了运动表现和下肢肌肉量,但只有 HV-LF 方案增加了上肢肥大并改善了身体成分。

相似文献

1
Comparison of 2 weekly-equalized volume resistance-training routines using different frequencies on body composition and performance in trained males.比较 2 种每周等容量阻力训练方案,在训练有素的男性中使用不同频率对身体成分和性能的影响。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018 May;43(5):475-481. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0575. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
2
Impact of Two High-Volume Set Configuration Workouts on Resistance Training Outcomes in Recreationally Trained Men.两种大重量设定训练方案对业余男性抗阻训练效果的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Feb 1;35(Suppl 1):S136-S143. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003163.
3
Low- and high-volume strength training induces similar neuromuscular improvements in muscle quality in elderly women.低强度和高强度力量训练均可引起老年女性肌肉质量的相似神经肌肉改善。
Exp Gerontol. 2013 Aug;48(8):710-6. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
4
Effects of Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in Well-Trained Men.低负荷与高负荷抗阻训练对训练有素男性肌肉力量和肥大的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Oct;29(10):2954-63. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000958.
5
Resistance Training Volume Enhances Muscle Hypertrophy but Not Strength in Trained Men.抗阻训练量增加训练男性的肌肉肥大,但不能增加其力量。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jan;51(1):94-103. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001764.
6
Eccentric resistance training increases and retains maximal strength, muscle endurance, and hypertrophy in trained men.离心阻力训练可增强并保持受过训练男性的最大力量、肌肉耐力和肌肉肥大。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Nov;41(11):1184-1189. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0321. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
7
High-Frequency Resistance Training Is Not More Effective Than Low-Frequency Resistance Training in Increasing Muscle Mass and Strength in Well-Trained Men.高频阻力训练并不比低频阻力训练更能有效增加训练有素男性的肌肉质量和力量。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S130-S139. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002559.
8
Time course of low- and high-volume strength training on neuromuscular adaptations and muscle quality in older women.老年女性进行低容量和高容量力量训练对神经肌肉适应性和肌肉质量的时间进程
Age (Dordr). 2014 Apr;36(2):881-92. doi: 10.1007/s11357-013-9611-2. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
9
Similarity in adaptations to high-resistance circuit vs. traditional strength training in resistance-trained men.抗阻训练男性对高阻力回路适应与传统力量训练的相似性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Sep;25(9):2519-27. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182023a51.
10
Effect of Lower-Body Resistance Training on Upper-Body Strength Adaptation in Trained Men.下肢抗阻训练对男性运动员上肢力量适应的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jan;32(1):13-18. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001639.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of inspiratory muscle training on 1RM performance and body composition in professional natural bodybuilders.吸气肌训练对职业自然健美运动员1RM表现及身体成分的影响。
Front Physiol. 2025 Apr 7;16:1574439. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1574439. eCollection 2025.
2
Full-body resistance training promotes greater fat mass loss than a split-body routine in well-trained males: A randomized trial.全身抗阻训练比分部位训练更能促进训练有素的男性体脂大量减少:一项随机试验。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2024 Jun;24(6):846-854. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12104. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Effect of different training frequencies on maximal strength performance and muscle hypertrophy in trained individuals-a within-subject design.
不同训练频率对训练个体最大力量表现和肌肉肥大的影响:一项自身对照设计研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0276154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276154. eCollection 2022.
4
Manipulating Resistance Training Variables to Induce Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy: A Brief Narrative Review.通过调整抗阻训练变量来增强肌肉力量和促进肌肉肥大:一篇简要叙述性综述
Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Jul 1;15(4):910-933. doi: 10.70252/VYUB3717. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of different resistance training frequencies on body composition and muscular performance adaptations in men.不同抗阻训练频率对男性身体成分及肌肉性能适应性的影响
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 21;9:e10537. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10537. eCollection 2021.
6
Effects of Variations in Resistance Training Frequency on Strength Development in Well-Trained Populations and Implications for In-Season Athlete Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.抗阻训练频率变化对训练有素人群力量发展的影响及其对赛季中运动员训练的意义:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2021 Sep;51(9):1967-1982. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01460-7. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
7
A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Resistance Training on Whole-Body Muscle Growth in Healthy Adult Males.一项系统评价和荟萃分析:抗阻训练对健康成年男性全身肌肉增长的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1285. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041285.
8
Similar Muscular Adaptations in Resistance Training Performed Two Versus Three Days Per Week.每周进行两天与三天抗阻训练时相似的肌肉适应性变化
J Hum Kinet. 2019 Aug 21;68:135-143. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0062. eCollection 2019 Aug.
9
Effects of photobiomodulation on muscle strength in post-menopausal women submitted to a resistance training program.光生物调节对接受抗阻训练方案的绝经后妇女肌肉力量的影响。
Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Mar;35(2):355-363. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02822-4. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
Weekly Training Frequency Effects on Strength Gain: A Meta-Analysis.每周训练频率对力量增长的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Sports Med Open. 2018 Aug 3;4(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40798-018-0149-9.