• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同抗阻训练频率对男性身体成分及肌肉性能适应性的影响

Effects of different resistance training frequencies on body composition and muscular performance adaptations in men.

作者信息

Arazi Hamid, Asadi Abbas, Gentil Paulo, Ramírez-Campillo Rodrigo, Jahangiri Pooria, Ghorbani Adel, Hackney Anthony C, Zouhal Hassane

机构信息

Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Guilan, Iran.

Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Payame Noor University, Rasht, Guilan, Iran.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2021 Apr 21;9:e10537. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10537. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.10537
PMID:33976952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8067909/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 8 weeks resistance training (RT) with two sessions versus four sessions per week under volume load-equated conditions on body composition, maximal strength, and explosive actions performance in recreationally trained men.

METHODS

Thirty-five healthy young men participated in the study and were randomly divided into a two sessions per-week RT (RT2, = 12), four sessions per-week RT (RT4, = 13) or a control group (CG, = 10). All subjects were evaluated for thigh, chest and arm circumference, countermovement jump (CMJ), medicine ball throw (MBT), 1-repetition maximum (1RM) leg press, bench press, arm curl, muscular endurance (i.e., 60% of 1RM to failure) for leg press, and bench press at pre, mid (week 4) and post an 8-week training intervention.

RESULTS

A two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures (3 [group] × 3 [time]) revealed that both training groups increased chest and thigh circumferences, strength and explosive actions performance tests in comparison to CG following 8 weeks of training ( = 0.01 to 0.04). Group × time interactions were also noted in 1RM bench press (effects size [ES] = 1.07 vs. 0.89) and arm curl (ES = 1.15 vs. 0.89), with greater gains for RT4 than RT2 ( = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

RT improved muscle strength, explosive actions performance and markers of muscle size in recreationally trained men; however, four sessions of resistance training per week produced greater gains in muscular strength for the upper body measures (i.e., 1RM bench press and arm curl) when compared to two sessions per week under volume-equated conditions.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较在等量负荷条件下,每周进行两次与四次训练的8周抗阻训练(RT)对有运动习惯的男性身体成分、最大力量和爆发力表现的影响。

方法

35名健康年轻男性参与了本研究,他们被随机分为每周两次抗阻训练组(RT2,n = 12)、每周四次抗阻训练组(RT4,n = 13)或对照组(CG,n = 10)。在为期8周的训练干预前、中期(第4周)和后期,对所有受试者的大腿、胸部和手臂围度、反向纵跳(CMJ)、药球投掷(MBT)、腿部推举1次最大重复量(1RM)、卧推、哑铃弯举、腿部推举和卧推的肌肉耐力(即1RM的60%至力竭)进行评估。

结果

重复测量的双向方差分析(3[组]×3[时间])显示,与对照组相比,两个训练组在8周训练后胸部和大腿围度、力量和爆发力表现测试均有所增加(P = 0.01至0.04)。在卧推1RM(效应量[ES]=1.07对0.89)和哑铃弯举(ES = 1.15对0.89)中也观察到组×时间交互作用,RT4组的增益大于RT2组(P = 0.03)。

结论

抗阻训练改善了有运动习惯男性的肌肉力量、爆发力表现和肌肉大小指标;然而,在等量负荷条件下,与每周两次训练相比,每周四次抗阻训练在上半身测量指标(即卧推1RM和哑铃弯举)的肌肉力量方面产生了更大的增益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/8067909/e2f8c58ec3ab/peerj-09-10537-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/8067909/f7ecab6c06f1/peerj-09-10537-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/8067909/e2f8c58ec3ab/peerj-09-10537-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/8067909/f7ecab6c06f1/peerj-09-10537-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe4/8067909/e2f8c58ec3ab/peerj-09-10537-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of different resistance training frequencies on body composition and muscular performance adaptations in men.不同抗阻训练频率对男性身体成分及肌肉性能适应性的影响
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 21;9:e10537. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10537. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of traditional and accommodating resistance training with chains on muscular adaptations in young men.传统与顺应性抗阻训练加链对青年男性肌肉适应性的比较。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2022 Feb;62(2):258-264. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12049-3. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
The Effects of Multiple-Joint Isokinetic Resistance Training on Maximal Isokinetic and Dynamic Muscle Strength and Local Muscular Endurance.多关节等速阻力训练对最大等速和动态肌肉力量及局部肌肉耐力的影响
J Sports Sci Med. 2016 Feb 23;15(1):34-40. eCollection 2016 Mar.
4
Comparison of two lower-body modes of endurance training on lower-body strength development while concurrently training.两种下肢耐力训练模式对同时进行训练时下肢力量发展的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 May;23(3):979-87. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a0629d.
5
Resistance Training Volume Enhances Muscle Hypertrophy but Not Strength in Trained Men.抗阻训练量增加训练男性的肌肉肥大,但不能增加其力量。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jan;51(1):94-103. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001764.
6
Caffeine ingestion acutely enhances muscular strength and power but not muscular endurance in resistance-trained men.摄入咖啡因能急性增强抗阻训练男性的肌肉力量和爆发力,但不会增强肌肉耐力。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Sep;17(8):1029-1036. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1330362. Epub 2017 May 24.
7
Velocity-Monitored Resistance Training in Older Adults: The Effects of Low-Velocity Loss Threshold on Strength and Functional Capacity.老年人速度监测抗阻训练:低速度损失阈值对力量和功能能力的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Nov 1;36(11):3200-3208. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004036. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Strength and Muscular Adaptations After 6 Weeks of Rest-Pause vs. Traditional Multiple-Sets Resistance Training in Trained Subjects.在训练有素的受试者中,休息-暂停与传统多组抗阻训练 6 周后的力量和肌肉适应性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S113-S121. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001923.
9
Effects of training frequency on muscular strength for trained men under volume matched conditions.在训练量匹配的条件下,训练频率对受过训练的男性肌肉力量的影响。
PeerJ. 2021 Feb 18;9:e10781. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10781. eCollection 2021.
10
Strength testing and training of rowers: a review.赛艇运动员的力量测试和训练:综述。
Sports Med. 2011 May 1;41(5):413-32. doi: 10.2165/11588540-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of 12 Weeks of Resistance Training on Body Composition, Muscle Hypertrophy and Function, Blood Lipid Level, and Hemorheological Properties in Middle-Aged Obese Women.12周抗阻训练对中年肥胖女性身体成分、肌肉肥大与功能、血脂水平及血液流变学特性的影响
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 12;24(7):196. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2407196. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Sex-based differences in the association of resistance training levels with the risk of hypertension.不同性别在抗阻训练水平与高血压风险的关联中的差异。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;12:1401254. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401254. eCollection 2024.
3
Minimalist Training: Is Lower Dosage or Intensity Resistance Training Effective to Improve Physical Fitness? A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Moderate vs high-load resistance training on muscular adaptations in rats.中等强度与大强度抗阻训练对大鼠肌肉适应性的影响。
Life Sci. 2019 Dec 1;238:116964. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116964. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
2
High Resistance-Training Frequency Enhances Muscle Thickness in Resistance-Trained Men.高频率抗阻训练可增加抗阻训练男性的肌肉厚度。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S140-S151. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002643.
3
Evidence of a Ceiling Effect for Training Volume in Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength in Trained Men - Less is More?
极简主义训练:较低剂量或强度的阻力训练对提高身体素质有效吗?一项叙述性综述。
Sports Med. 2024 Feb;54(2):289-302. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01949-3. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
4
Maximal Number of Repetitions at Percentages of the One Repetition Maximum: A Meta-Regression and Moderator Analysis of Sex, Age, Training Status, and Exercise.以一次重复最大值的百分比计算的最大重复次数:性别、年龄、训练状态和运动的元回归及调节因素分析
Sports Med. 2024 Feb;54(2):303-321. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01937-7. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
5
Quantifying the Generality of Strength Adaptation: A Meta-Analysis.量化力量适应的普遍性:一项荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2023 Mar;53(3):637-648. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01790-0. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
The Effect of Whole-Body Traditional and Functional Resistance Training on CAVI and Its Association With Muscular Fitness in Untrained Young Men.全身传统与功能性抗阻训练对未经训练的年轻男性中心动脉硬度指数(CAVI)的影响及其与肌肉适能的关联
Front Physiol. 2022 May 25;13:888048. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.888048. eCollection 2022.
7
Effects of 6-Week Traditional and Functional Resistance Training on Arterial Stiffness and Muscular Strength in Healthy Young Men.为期6周的传统与功能性抗阻训练对健康年轻男性动脉僵硬度和肌肉力量的影响
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 2;13:859402. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.859402. eCollection 2022.
在有训练经验的男性中,肌肉肥大和力量训练的量效关系存在上限效应的证据 - 少即是多?
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 Feb 1;15(2):268-277. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0914. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
4
Exercise-Induced Changes in Muscle Size do not Contribute to Exercise-Induced Changes in Muscle Strength.运动引起的肌肉大小变化对运动引起的肌肉力量变化并无贡献。
Sports Med. 2019 Jul;49(7):987-991. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01106-9.
5
How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize muscle hypertrophy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of resistance training frequency.每周应该训练多少次肌肉才能最大限度地促进肌肉肥大?一项系统回顾和荟萃分析研究了抗阻训练频率的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2019 Jun;37(11):1286-1295. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1555906. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
6
Resistance Training Frequencies of 3 and 6 Times Per Week Produce Similar Muscular Adaptations in Resistance-Trained Men.每周进行 3 次和 6 次的抗阻训练产生相似的肌肉适应性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S122-S129. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002909.
7
Resistance training frequency and skeletal muscle hypertrophy: A review of available evidence.抗阻训练频率与骨骼肌肥大:现有证据综述
J Sci Med Sport. 2019 Mar;22(3):361-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.09.223. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
8
Effects of equal-volume resistance training with different training frequencies in muscle size and strength in trained men.不同训练频率的等容阻力训练对训练有素男性肌肉大小和力量的影响。
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 22;6:e5020. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5020. eCollection 2018.
9
Effect of Resistance Training Frequency on Neuromuscular Performance and Muscle Morphology After 8 Weeks in Trained Men.抗阻训练频率对训练男性 8 周后神经肌肉性能和肌肉形态的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Aug;33(8):2104-2116. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002563.
10
High-Frequency Resistance Training Is Not More Effective Than Low-Frequency Resistance Training in Increasing Muscle Mass and Strength in Well-Trained Men.高频阻力训练并不比低频阻力训练更能有效增加训练有素男性的肌肉质量和力量。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S130-S139. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002559.