Lau Annie Ys, Piper Kalman, Bokor Desmond, Martin Paige, Lau Victor Sl, Coiera Enrico
Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 Dec 7;4(4):e31. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.8096.
Translating research into practice, especially the implementation of digital health technologies in routine care, is increasingly important. Yet, there are few studies examining the challenges of implementing patient-facing digital technologies in health care settings.
The aim of this study was to report challenges experienced when implementing mobile apps for patients to support their postsurgical rehabilitation in an orthopedic setting.
A mobile app was tailored to the needs of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. A 30-min usability session and a 12-week feasibility study were conducted with patients to evaluate the app in routine care. Implementation records (observation reports, issues log, and email correspondence) explored factors that hindered or facilitated patient acceptance. Interviews with clinicians explored factors that influenced app integration in routine care.
Participant completion was low (47%, 9/19). Factors that affected patient acceptance included digital literacy, health status, information technology (IT) infrastructure at home, privacy concerns, time limitations, the role of a caregiver, inconsistencies in instruction received from clinicians and the app, and app advice not reflective of patient progress over time. Factors that negatively influenced app integration in routine care included competing demands among clinicians, IT infrastructure in health care settings, identifying the right time to introduce the app to patients, user interface complexity for older patients, lack of coordination among multidisciplinary clinicians, and technical issues with app installation.
Three insights were identified for mobile app implementation in routine care: (1) apps for patients need to reflect their journey over time and in particular, postoperative apps ought to be introduced as part of preoperative care with opportunities for patients to learn and adopt the app during their postoperative journey; (2) strategies to address digital literacy issues among patients and clinicians are essential; and (3) impact of the app on patient outcomes and clinician workflow needs to be communicated, monitored, and reviewed. Lastly, digital health interventions should supplement but not replace patient interaction with clinicians.
将研究成果转化为实际应用,尤其是在日常护理中实施数字健康技术,变得越来越重要。然而,很少有研究探讨在医疗环境中实施面向患者的数字技术所面临的挑战。
本研究旨在报告在骨科环境中为患者实施移动应用程序以支持其术后康复时所遇到的挑战。
根据肩袖修复患者的需求定制了一款移动应用程序。对患者进行了30分钟的可用性测试和为期12周的可行性研究,以评估该应用程序在日常护理中的效果。实施记录(观察报告、问题日志和电子邮件通信)探讨了阻碍或促进患者接受的因素。对临床医生的访谈探讨了影响应用程序在日常护理中整合的因素。
参与者完成率较低(47%,9/19)。影响患者接受度的因素包括数字素养、健康状况、家中的信息技术(IT)基础设施、隐私问题、时间限制、护理人员的作用、临床医生和应用程序提供的指导不一致,以及应用程序建议未反映患者随时间的进展情况。对日常护理中应用程序整合产生负面影响的因素包括临床医生之间相互竞争的需求、医疗环境中的IT基础设施、确定向患者介绍应用程序的合适时间、老年患者的用户界面复杂性、多学科临床医生之间缺乏协调以及应用程序安装的技术问题。
确定了在日常护理中实施移动应用程序的三点见解:(1)面向患者的应用程序需要反映他们随时间的康复过程,特别是术后应用程序应作为术前护理的一部分引入,以便患者在术后康复过程中有机会学习和使用该应用程序;(2)解决患者和临床医生数字素养问题的策略至关重要;(3)需要对应用程序对患者预后和临床医生工作流程的影响进行沟通、监测和审查。最后,数字健康干预应补充而不是取代患者与临床医生的互动。