• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发促进急诊护理路径的健康信息系统:一项参与式设计研究。

Development of a health information system to promote emergency care pathways: A participatory design study.

作者信息

Østervang Christina, Lassen Annmarie, Schmidt Thomas, Coyne Elisabeth, Dieperink Karin Brochstedt, Jensen Charlotte Myhre

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2022 Dec 26;8:20552076221145856. doi: 10.1177/20552076221145856. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076221145856
PMID:36601282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9806496/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The successful development and implementation of sustainable healthcare technologies require an understanding of the clinical setting and its potential challenges from a user perspective. Previous studies have uncovered a gap between what emergency departments deliver and the needs and preferences of patients and family members. This study investigated whether a user-driven approach and participatory design could provide a technical solution to bridge the identified gap.

METHODS

We conducted four workshops, and five one-to-one workshops with patients, family members, healthcare professionals, and information technology specialists to codesign a prototype. Revisions of the prototype were made until an acceptable solution was agreed upon and tested by the participants. The data were analyzed following iterative processes (plan → act → observe → reflect).

RESULTS

The participants emphasized the importance of a person-centered approach focusing on improved information. An already implemented system for clinicians' use only was redesigned into a unique patient module that provides a process line displaying continually updated informative features, including (1) person-centered activities, (2) general information videos, (3) a notepad, (4) estimated waiting time, and (5) the nurse and physician responsible for care and treatment.

CONCLUSION

Participatory design is a usable approach to designing an information system for use in the emergency department. The process yielded insight into the complexity of translating ideas into technologies that can actually be implemented in clinical practice, and the user perspectives revealed the key to identifying these complex aspects. The iterations with the participants enabled us to redesign an existing technology.

摘要

目的

可持续医疗技术的成功开发与实施需要从用户角度理解临床环境及其潜在挑战。以往研究发现急诊科提供的服务与患者及其家属的需求和偏好之间存在差距。本研究调查了以用户为驱动的方法和参与式设计是否能提供一种技术解决方案来弥合已识别的差距。

方法

我们与患者、家属、医护人员和信息技术专家举办了四场研讨会以及五场一对一研讨会,共同设计一个原型。对原型进行修订,直到参与者达成可接受的解决方案并进行测试。按照迭代过程(计划→行动→观察→反思)对数据进行分析。

结果

参与者强调了以患者为中心、注重改善信息的方法的重要性。一个已实施的仅供临床医生使用的系统被重新设计成一个独特的患者模块,该模块提供一条流程线,展示不断更新的信息功能,包括(1)以患者为中心的活动,(2)一般信息视频,(3)一个记事本,(4)预计等待时间,以及(5)负责护理和治疗的护士和医生。

结论

参与式设计是一种可用于设计急诊科信息系统的方法。该过程深入了解了将想法转化为可在临床实践中实际实施的技术的复杂性,而用户视角揭示了识别这些复杂方面的关键。与参与者的反复交流使我们能够重新设计现有技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/4228c8dbae11/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/dc613dbe1b82/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/b5583dc43a63/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/8eee93167202/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/1325f74f12c8/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/c13ea93e39a0/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/4228c8dbae11/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/dc613dbe1b82/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/b5583dc43a63/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/8eee93167202/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/1325f74f12c8/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/c13ea93e39a0/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8672/9806496/4228c8dbae11/10.1177_20552076221145856-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a health information system to promote emergency care pathways: A participatory design study.开发促进急诊护理路径的健康信息系统:一项参与式设计研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Dec 26;8:20552076221145856. doi: 10.1177/20552076221145856. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
Bridging the gap: A user-driven study on new ways to support self-care and empowerment for patients with hip fracture.弥合差距:一项关于支持髋部骨折患者自我护理和赋权新方法的用户驱动研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2018 Sep 7;6:2050312118799121. doi: 10.1177/2050312118799121. eCollection 2018.
3
Development of an mHealth App for Patients With Psoriasis Undergoing Biological Treatment: Participatory Design Study.开发一款用于接受生物治疗的银屑病患者的移动医疗应用:参与式设计研究。
JMIR Dermatol. 2021 May 10;4(1):e26673. doi: 10.2196/26673.
4
Codesign of health technology interventions to support best-practice perioperative care and surgical waitlist management.健康技术干预措施的协同设计,以支持最佳实践围手术期护理和手术等候名单管理。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Mar 12;31(1):e100928. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100928.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
7
Technology-Enabled Reform in a Nontraditional Mental Health Service for Eating Disorders: Participatory Design Study.技术支持的非传统进食障碍精神健康服务改革:参与式设计研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 16;23(2):e19532. doi: 10.2196/19532.
8
What are the needs and preferences of patients and family members discharged from the emergency department within 24 hours? A qualitative study towards a family-centred approach.在急诊部门出院的患者及其家属在 24 小时内的需求和偏好是什么?一种以家庭为中心的方法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e050694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050694.
9
Patient-Centered Decision Support: Formative Usability Evaluation of Integrated Clinical Decision Support With a Patient Decision Aid for Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department.以患者为中心的决策支持:急诊科针对轻度头部损伤将综合临床决策支持与患者决策辅助工具进行整合的形成性可用性评估
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 19;19(5):e174. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7846.
10
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.确定照护模式以改善有紧急照护需求的老年人的结局:一种开发系统动力学模型的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved Mental Health Support for Patients With Self-Harm Injuries in the Emergency Department: Design and Development of a Future Patient Care Pathway.急诊科对自残伤患者心理健康支持的改善:未来患者护理路径的设计与开发
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70067. doi: 10.1111/inm.70067.
2
Effectiveness, usability, and patient satisfaction of an mHealth application with an integrated ePRO system following lumbar degenerative spinal surgery: A quasi-experimental study.腰椎退行性脊柱手术后,一款集成电子患者报告结局(ePRO)系统的移动健康(mHealth)应用程序的有效性、可用性及患者满意度:一项准实验研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 20;11:20552076251324687. doi: 10.1177/20552076251324687. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an mHealth App for Patients With Psoriasis Undergoing Biological Treatment: Participatory Design Study.开发一款用于接受生物治疗的银屑病患者的移动医疗应用:参与式设计研究。
JMIR Dermatol. 2021 May 10;4(1):e26673. doi: 10.2196/26673.
2
In-hospital interventions to promote relational practice with families in acute care settings: A scoping review.在急性护理环境中促进与家庭建立关系性实践的院内干预措施:一项范围综述。
Health SA. 2022 Feb 14;27:1694. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1694. eCollection 2022.
3
Health professionals' perspectives of patients' and family members' needs in emergency departments and patient pathway improvement: a qualitative study in Denmark.
Examining Challenges to Co-Design Digital Health Interventions With End Users: Systematic Review.
审视与终端用户共同设计数字健康干预措施所面临的挑战:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 14;27:e50178. doi: 10.2196/50178.
4
Designing Patient-Centered Interventions for Emergency Care: Participatory Design Study.为急诊护理设计以患者为中心的干预措施:参与式设计研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 12;9:e63610. doi: 10.2196/63610.
5
Development of an eHealth Intervention Including Self-Management for Reducing Sedentary Time in the Transition to Retirement: Participatory Design Study.一项包括自我管理在内的电子健康干预措施的开发,旨在减少退休过渡阶段的久坐时间:参与式设计研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 20;9:e63567. doi: 10.2196/63567.
6
Implementation facilitators and barriers of person and family-centred emergency care.以患者和家庭为中心的急诊护理的实施促进因素和障碍
Health SA. 2024 Nov 6;29:2789. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2789. eCollection 2024.
7
A Smart Glass Telemedicine Application for Prehospital Communication: User-Centered Design Study.一种用于院前通信的智能眼镜远程医疗应用:以用户为中心的设计研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 29;26:e53157. doi: 10.2196/53157.
8
Identifying Interventions to Improve Diagnostic Safety in Emergency Departments: Protocol for a Participatory Design Study.确定提高急诊科诊断安全性的干预措施:参与式设计研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 21;13:e55357. doi: 10.2196/55357.
9
Epistemological aspects of participatory design studies conducted in the field of health science.健康科学领域中参与式设计研究的认识论方面。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Aug;81(8):5151-5162. doi: 10.1111/jan.16293. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
10
Usability and Evaluation of a Health Information System in the Emergency Department: Mixed Methods Study.在急诊室中使用和评估健康信息系统的实用性:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Feb 21;11:e48445. doi: 10.2196/48445.
健康专业人员对急诊科患者和家属需求及患者流程改进的观点:丹麦的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 28;12(2):e057937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057937.
4
What are the needs and preferences of patients and family members discharged from the emergency department within 24 hours? A qualitative study towards a family-centred approach.在急诊部门出院的患者及其家属在 24 小时内的需求和偏好是什么?一种以家庭为中心的方法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e050694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050694.
5
Interventions to Improve Communication at Hospital Discharge and Rates of Readmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.干预措施以改善出院时的沟通和再入院率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119346. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19346.
6
How to improve emergency care to adults discharged within 24 hours? Acute Care planning in Emergency departments (The ACE study): a protocol of a participatory design study.如何提高在 24 小时内出院的成年患者的急救护理水平?急诊科急性护理计划(ACE 研究):一项参与式设计研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 22;10(12):e041743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041743.
7
Technology-Assisted Self-Monitoring of Lifestyle Behaviors and Health Indicators in Diabetes: Qualitative Study.糖尿病患者生活方式行为与健康指标的技术辅助自我监测:定性研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2020 Aug 28;5(3):e21183. doi: 10.2196/21183.
8
Connected Personas: Translating the Complexity of Older Adult Personal Health Information Management for Designers of Health Information Technologies.关联角色:为健康信息技术设计师解读老年人个人健康信息管理的复杂性
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:1177-1186. eCollection 2019.
9
A Patient-Centered Information System (myED) for Emergency Care Journeys: Design, Development, and Initial Adoption.一种用于急诊护理流程的以患者为中心的信息系统(myED):设计、开发与初步应用。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Feb 25;4(2):e16410. doi: 10.2196/16410.
10
Staff strategies for dealing with care situations at an emergency department.应对急诊科护理情况的员工策略。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Dec;34(4):1038-1044. doi: 10.1111/scs.12812. Epub 2019 Dec 21.