• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字麻醉的疗效:两种技术的比较。

Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques.

作者信息

Ahmad Muhammad

机构信息

Department of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Islamabad Private Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

World J Plast Surg. 2017 Sep;6(3):351-355.

PMID:29218285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5714981/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital nerve block is commonly performed by care providers in medical fields. This study compares the blocks in terms of effectiveness of anesthesia and pain.

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups. First group underwent digital block whereas 2 group had transmetacarpal digital block. The subcutaneous ring block was performed by two injections of 3 ml of 2% lignocaine in a 3 ml syringe with a 26G needle at the level of phalangeal/palmer crease. One prick was performed on either side of the finger base extending on dorsal and volar aspects of the digit. The transmetacarpal block received lignocaine identically at dorsal aspect of metacarpo-phalangeal joint. 1.5ml of the solution was injected in dorsal and 1.5ml in palmer side on either side of the finger. When sensation of needle was felt, 1ml of the solution was injected. Then the needle was withdrawn injecting another 1ml and finally the last 1ml was injected close to the dorsal skin. The pain prick was recorded after 30 seconds.

RESULTS

The mean time to complete abolition of sensation was 9.1 minutes in group I and 9.0 minutes in group II. The mean duration of anaesthesia was 202 minutes in group I and 206.8 minutes in group II. The mean pain scale was 5.67 (range=4-7) in group I and 4.2 (range=3-7) in group II.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous ring block and transmetacarpal techniques are good in digital anesthesia and involve the administration of the local anaesthetic through two injections.

摘要

背景

在医学领域,护理人员常进行指神经阻滞。本研究比较了两种阻滞方法在麻醉效果和疼痛方面的差异。

方法

将患者分为两组。第一组接受指阻滞,而第二组接受掌骨间指阻滞。皮下环形阻滞是通过在指骨/掌侧折痕水平,使用26G针头的3ml注射器分两次注射3ml 2%利多卡因进行的。在手指基部两侧各进行一次穿刺,穿刺点向手指的背侧和掌侧延伸。掌骨间阻滞在掌指关节背侧以相同方式给予利多卡因。在手指两侧的背侧注射1.5ml溶液,掌侧注射1.5ml。当感觉到针刺感时,注射1ml溶液。然后拔出针头,再注射1ml,最后在靠近背侧皮肤处注射最后1ml。30秒后记录疼痛穿刺情况。

结果

第一组感觉完全消失的平均时间为9.1分钟,第二组为9.0分钟。第一组的平均麻醉持续时间为202分钟,第二组为206.8分钟。第一组的平均疼痛评分是5.67(范围=4 - 7),第二组为4.2(范围=3 - 7)。

结论

皮下环形阻滞和掌骨间技术在指麻醉方面效果良好,且都涉及通过两次注射给予局部麻醉剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c56/5714981/5e22b27922f6/wjps-6-351-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c56/5714981/14064d9d05b5/wjps-6-351-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c56/5714981/5e22b27922f6/wjps-6-351-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c56/5714981/14064d9d05b5/wjps-6-351-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c56/5714981/5e22b27922f6/wjps-6-351-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques.数字麻醉的疗效:两种技术的比较。
World J Plast Surg. 2017 Sep;6(3):351-355.
2
Comparison of the efficacy of single volar subcutaneous digital block and the dorsal two injections block.掌侧单指皮下阻滞与背侧两点注射阻滞效果的比较。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014 Jan-Mar;26(1):88-91.
3
Regional anaesthesia on the finger: Traditional dorsal digital nerve block versus subcutaneous volar nerve block, a randomized controlled trial.手指区域麻醉:传统背侧指神经阻滞与皮下掌侧神经阻滞的随机对照试验。
Injury. 2021 Apr;52(4):883-888. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Comparison of traditional two injections dorsal digital block with volar block.传统两针指背阻滞与掌侧阻滞的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008 Dec;18(12):768-70.
5
Evaluation of a transthecal digital nerve block in the injured pediatric patient.经鞘膜数字神经阻滞在小儿创伤患者中的评估
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Mar;26(3):177-80. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181d1dfaf.
6
Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia.单注射掌侧皮下阻滞与双注射背侧阻滞用于手指麻醉的随机对照比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Oct;118(5):1195-1200. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237016.00941.96.
7
Reducing patient discomfort during digital blockade: The subcutaneous single injection digital block - A simple, safe and fast procedure.减轻数字阻滞期间患者的不适:皮下单次注射数字阻滞——一种简单、安全且快速的操作。
Can J Plast Surg. 2003 Spring;11(1):33-5. doi: 10.1177/229255030301100108.
8
Double-dorsal versus single-volar digital subcutaneous anaesthetic injection for finger injuries in the emergency department: A randomised controlled trial.急诊科手指损伤采用双背侧与单掌侧数字皮下麻醉注射的随机对照试验
Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Apr;28(2):193-8. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12559. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
9
Single injection digital block: comparison between three techniques.单次注射指神经阻滞:三种技术的比较
Chir Main. 2002 May;21(3):182-7. doi: 10.1016/s1297-3203(02)00107-5.
10
Is it true that injecting palmar finger skin hurts more than dorsal skin? New level 1 evidence.注射手掌手指皮肤比手背皮肤更疼,这是真的吗?新的一级证据。
Hand (N Y). 2011 Mar;6(1):47-9. doi: 10.1007/s11552-010-9288-2. Epub 2010 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital anaesthesia: one injection or two?数字麻醉:一针还是两针?
Emerg Med J. 2010 Jul;27(7):533-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.072850. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
2
Comparison of traditional two injections dorsal digital block with volar block.传统两针指背阻滞与掌侧阻滞的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008 Dec;18(12):768-70.
3
Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia.单注射掌侧皮下阻滞与双注射背侧阻滞用于手指麻醉的随机对照比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Oct;118(5):1195-1200. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237016.00941.96.
4
Digital anaesthesia: comparison of the efficacy and pain associated with three digital nerve block techniques.
J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Dec;30(6):581-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.06.014. Epub 2005 Aug 29.
5
Modified transthecal digital block versus traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger.改良经皮指神经阻滞与传统指神经阻滞用于手指麻醉的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Jan;29(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.09.018.
6
Single injection digital block: comparison between three techniques.单次注射指神经阻滞:三种技术的比较
Chir Main. 2002 May;21(3):182-7. doi: 10.1016/s1297-3203(02)00107-5.
7
Transthecal digital block at the proximal phalanx.经腱鞘在近节指骨处进行数字阻滞。
J Hand Surg Br. 2001 Feb;26(1):69-71. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0519.
8
Comparison of transthecal and subcutaneous single-injection digital block techniques.经皮鞘内和皮下单次注射指神经阻滞技术的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Sep;22(5):901-5. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(97)80088-3.
9
Comparison of digital versus metacarpal blocks for repair of finger injuries.数字阻滞与掌骨阻滞用于手指损伤修复的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Jun;23(6):1296-300. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70355-8.
10
Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger.
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 May;25(5):604-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70171-0.