Suppr超能文献

Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger.

作者信息

Hill R G, Patterson J W, Parker J C, Bauer J, Wright E, Heller M B

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, St Luke's Hospital, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1995 May;25(5):604-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70171-0.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the newly described transthecal (TT) and traditional (TD) methods of digital block anesthesia with regard to length of time to achieve anesthesia and pain during infiltration.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded study.

PARTICIPANTS

Healthy adult paid volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS

Each subject received a TT block on one hand and a TD block on the opposite hand. All blocks were performed by the same investigator and were rated by an evaluator who was blinded to the technique that was used. Time to loss of pin-prick sensation was measured, and the pain of the procedure was recorded by the subject on a 10-cm visual-analog scale.

RESULTS

A total of 162 blocks (81 TT and 81 TD) were performed in 31 different subjects. All blocks were successful. Mean time to anesthesia for TT block was 188 seconds compared with 152 seconds for the TD block (P < .01). Mean analog pain score was slightly higher for TT block than for TD block (1.7 versus 1.4, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

TT block is clinically equal to the TD method in terms of time to anesthesia and visual-analog pain score.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验