• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger.

作者信息

Hill R G, Patterson J W, Parker J C, Bauer J, Wright E, Heller M B

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, St Luke's Hospital, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1995 May;25(5):604-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70171-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70171-0
PMID:7741335
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the newly described transthecal (TT) and traditional (TD) methods of digital block anesthesia with regard to length of time to achieve anesthesia and pain during infiltration.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded study.

PARTICIPANTS

Healthy adult paid volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS

Each subject received a TT block on one hand and a TD block on the opposite hand. All blocks were performed by the same investigator and were rated by an evaluator who was blinded to the technique that was used. Time to loss of pin-prick sensation was measured, and the pain of the procedure was recorded by the subject on a 10-cm visual-analog scale.

RESULTS

A total of 162 blocks (81 TT and 81 TD) were performed in 31 different subjects. All blocks were successful. Mean time to anesthesia for TT block was 188 seconds compared with 152 seconds for the TD block (P < .01). Mean analog pain score was slightly higher for TT block than for TD block (1.7 versus 1.4, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

TT block is clinically equal to the TD method in terms of time to anesthesia and visual-analog pain score.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger.
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 May;25(5):604-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70171-0.
2
Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger.经鞘数字阻滞与传统数字阻滞用于手指麻醉的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Oct;114(5):1131-4; discussion 1135-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000135848.60764.ae.
3
Modified transthecal digital block versus traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger.改良经皮指神经阻滞与传统指神经阻滞用于手指麻醉的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Jan;29(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.09.018.
4
Evaluation of a transthecal digital nerve block in the injured pediatric patient.经鞘膜数字神经阻滞在小儿创伤患者中的评估
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Mar;26(3):177-80. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181d1dfaf.
5
Dose effectiveness of transthecal digital block.经皮数字阻滞的剂量有效性。
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Mar;34(3):458-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.11.024.
6
Comparison of digital versus metacarpal blocks for repair of finger injuries.数字阻滞与掌骨阻滞用于手指损伤修复的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Jun;23(6):1296-300. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70355-8.
7
Comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine/bupivacaine for local anesthesia/digital nerve block.布比卡因与利多卡因/布比卡因用于局部麻醉/指神经阻滞的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):490-2. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70239-1.
8
Comparison of transthecal and subcutaneous single-injection digital block techniques.经皮鞘内和皮下单次注射指神经阻滞技术的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Sep;22(5):901-5. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(97)80088-3.
9
Digital anaesthesia: comparison of the efficacy and pain associated with three digital nerve block techniques.
J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Dec;30(6):581-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.06.014. Epub 2005 Aug 29.
10
Single injection digital block: comparison between three techniques.单次注射指神经阻滞:三种技术的比较
Chir Main. 2002 May;21(3):182-7. doi: 10.1016/s1297-3203(02)00107-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital nerve blocks: A systematic review and meta-analysis.指神经阻滞:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jul 1;3(4):e12753. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12753. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques.数字麻醉的疗效:两种技术的比较。
World J Plast Surg. 2017 Sep;6(3):351-355.